Abstract
Maps and diagrams have long been used by science and education. The results and achievements of geography, astronomy, biology, economics have always been presented in the form of maps. Modern methods and tools of network science allow to deeper understand collaboration because relations between agents of activity are represented as a map. For many collaborative educational systems maps of relations between agents and activity products are built automatically. However, these diagrams are not used in educational practice as tools for better learning. The paper provides examples of how the diagrams were used in educational practice in order to support a group reflection of collaborative activities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Luke, D.A.: A User’s Guide to Network Analysis in R. UR. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23883-8
DeChurch, L.A., Mesmer-Magnus, J.R.: Measuring shared team mental models: a meta-analysis. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 14, 1–14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017455
Gama, J., Passos, P., Davids, K., et al.: Network analysis and intra-team activity in attacking phases of professional football. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 14, 692–708 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868752
Kröckel, P., Piazza, A., Neuhofer, K.: Dynamic network analysis of the Euro2016 final: preliminary results. In: 2017 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW), pp. 114–119 (2017)
Huerta-Quintanilla, R., Canto-Lugo, E., Viga-de Alva, D.: Modeling social network topologies in elementary schools. PLoS ONE 8, e55371 (2013)
Barabási, A.-L.: Network Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016). Committee on Network Science for Future Army Applications, National Research Council: Network Science. The National Academies Press (2005)
Mehra, A., Borgatti, A., Soltis, S., et al.: Imaginary worlds: using visual network scales to capture perceptions of social networks. In: Borgatti, S., Brass, D., Halgin, D., Labianca, G., Mehra, A. (eds.) Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks, pp. 315–336. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2014)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Schwartz, D.L.: The productive agency that drives collaborative learning. In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 197–218. Elsevier Science/Permagon (1999)
Schwartz, D.L., Lin, X.: Computers, productive agency, and the effort after shared meaning. J. Comput. High Educ. 12, 3–33 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940954
Börner, K., Palmer, F., Davis, J.M., et al.: Teaching children the structure of science. In: IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, p. 724307. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2009)
Fontana, M., Terna, P.: From Agent-based models to network analysis (and return): the policy-making perspective. University of Turin (2015)
Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R.: Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, USA (1996)
Epstein, J.M.: Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)
Epstein, J.M.: Agent_Zero: Toward Neurocognitive Foundations for Generative Social Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014)
Resnick, M.: Turtles, Termites, and Traffic Jams: Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
Patarakin, E.D.: Wikigrams-based social inquiry. In: Levin, I., Tsybulsky, D. (eds.) Digital Tools and Solutions for Inquiry-Based STEM Learning, pp. 112–138. IGI Global, Hershey (2017)
Burov, V., Patarakin, E., Yarmakhov, B.: A crowdsourcing model for public consultations on draft laws. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 450–451. ACM, New York (2012)
Wickham, H., Grolemund, G.: R for Data Science: Import, Tidy, Transform, Visualize, and Model Data. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2016)
Tyner, S., Briatte, F., Hofmann, H.: Network visualization with ggplot2. R J. 9, 27 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Patarakin, E., Burov, V. (2020). Using of Automatically and Semi-automatically Generated Diagrams in Educational Practice. In: Chugunov, A., Khodachek, I., Misnikov, Y., Trutnev, D. (eds) Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39295-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39296-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)