Skip to main content

CAD-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Safe Scheduling of HRC Operations for Parts Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2020 (IHSI 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1131))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4577 Accesses

Abstract

The presented paper suggests a design method which seeks to identify the best scheduling of human robot collaborative (HRC) operations with respect to a required safety level. The human behavior along manufacturing scenarios is effectively forecasted through dedicated computer-aided tools. Consequently, this method stresses the usage of virtual environment to replicate both human postures and robot encumbrances over the manufacturing operations. Moreover, it proposes a safety index formulation for HRC systems based on the minimum distance between human and robot (H-R). As results, the approach returns the safety index for every possible combination of H-R operations. Subsequently, a scheduling algorithm suggests the operations sequence depending on the expected value of the safety index, providing an evaluation of the time needed to complete the process. The method is validated on surface control phase involved in post-processing of parts produced by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) Additive Manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ISO 10218-1:2011 Robots and robotic devices - Safety requirements for industrial robots - Part 1: Robots

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISO 10218-2:2011 Robots and robotic devices - Safety requirements for industrial robots - Part 2: Robot systems and integration

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hu, J.-J., Huang C.-N., Wang H.-W., Shieh P.-H., Hu J.-S.: Safety-based human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing: a case study of power protector assembly. In: Proceedings of the ARIS, Tainan, TW, pp. 28–31 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen, R., Johansen, K.: Assembly cell concept for human and robot in cooperation. In: 22nd ICPR, Parana, BR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tan, J.T.C., Duan, F., Zhang, Y., Watanabe, K., Kato, R., Arai, T.: Human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing: design and development. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ ICIRS, St. Louis, MO, USA, pp. 29–34 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zanchettin, A.M., Ceriani, N.M., Rocco, P., Ding, H., Matthias, B.: Safety in human-robot collaborative manufacturing environments: metrics and control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 13(2), 882–893 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cordero, C.A., Carbone, G., Ceccarelli, M., Echávarri, J., Muñoz, J.L.: Experimental tests in human–robot collision evaluation and characterization of a new safety index for robot operation. Mech. Mach. Theory 80, 184–199 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsai, C.-S., Hu, J.-S., Tomizuka M.: Ensuring safety in human-robot coexistence environment. In: IEEE ICIRS, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 4191–4196 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Najmaei, N., Lele, S., Kermani, M.R., Sobot, R.: Human factors for robot safety assessment. In: Proceedings of AIM, Montreal, QC, CA, pp. 539–544 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou, D., Chen, J., Lv, C., Cao, Q.: A method for integrating ergonomics analysis into maintainability design in a virtual environment. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 54, 154–163 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., D’Oria, C.: Proposal of a new quantitative method for postural comfort evaluation. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 48, 25–35 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalpadulo, E., Pini, F., Leali, F.: Assessment of design for additive manufacturing based on CAD platforms. In: Rizzi, C., Andrisano, A.O., Leali, F., Gherardini, F., Pini, F., Vergnano, A. (eds.) Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering. LNME, pp. 970–981. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Pini, F., Leali, F., Ansaloni, M.: A systematic approach to the engineering design of a HRC workcell for bio-medical product assembly. In: Proceedings of the ETFA, Luxembourg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pini, F., Ansaloni, M., Leali, F.: Evaluation of operator relief for an effective design of HRC workcells. In: Proceedings of the ETFA, Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Pini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pini, F., Dalpadulo, E., Leali, F. (2020). CAD-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Safe Scheduling of HRC Operations for Parts Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Vergnano, A., Leali, F., Taiar, R. (eds) Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2020. IHSI 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_120

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics