Skip to main content

Alpha and Beta EEG Desynchronizations Anticipate Steering Actions in a Driving Simulation Experiment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1131))

Abstract

Car accidents are considered to be one of the major cause of death all around the world. In order to design electronic devices to improve car safety in the future, we aimed to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) activities to disentangle left from right steering actions in car driving simulation. For this purpose, we performed 128-channels EEG recordings during the driving of a car simulator. EEG scalp topographies resulting from and Independent Component Analysis were clustered across subjects. The corresponding time-frequency patterns of power activity were compared, revealing two distinct EEG clusters reacting with a coupled alpha and beta desynchronization in the preparation of the left and right steering onset, respectively. Topographic maps and dipole localization showed that these EEG components are originated from motor regions of the two hemispheres. Overall, these results illustrate that alpha and beta EEG rhythms could be exploited to predict the driver’s intention in steering actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Calhoun, V.D., Pearlson, G.D.: A selective review of simulated driving studies: combining naturalistic and hybrid paradigms, analysis approaches, and future directions. NeuroImage 59, 25–35 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borghini, G., Astolfi, L., Vecchiato, G., Mattia, D., Babiloni, F.: Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 44, 58–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biasiucci, A., Franceschiello, B., Murray, M.M.: Electroencephalography. Curr. Biol. 29, R80–R85 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delorme, A., Palmer, J., Onton, J., Oostenveld, R., Makeig, S.: Independent EEG sources are dipolar. PLoS ONE 7, e30135 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Debnath, R., Salo, V.C., Buzzell, G.A., Yoo, K.H., Fox, N.A.: Mu rhythm desynchronization is specific to action execution and observation: evidence from time-frequency and connectivity analysis. NeuroImage 184, 496–507 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vecchiato, G., Vecchio, M.D., Ascari, L., Antopolskiy, S., Deon, F., Kubin, L., Ambeck-Madsen, J., Rizzolatti, G., Avanzini, P.: Electroencephalographic time-frequency patterns of braking and acceleration movement preparation in car driving simulation. Brain Res. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience (2019). sccn/labstreaminglayer

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bigdely-Shamlo, N., Mullen, T., Kothe, C., Su, K.-M., Robbins, K.A.: The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis. Front Neuroinform. 9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2015.00016

  9. Palmer, J., Kreutz-Delgado, K., Makeig, S.: AMICA: an adaptive mixture of independent component analyzers with shared components (2011). https://sccn.ucsd.edu/~jason/amica_a.pdf

  10. Chaumon, M., Bishop, D.V.M., Busch, N.A.: A practical guide to the selection of independent components of the electroencephalogram for artifact correction. J. Neurosci. Methods 250, 47–63 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Makeig, S., Debener, S., Onton, J., Delorme, A.: Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 204–210 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Avanzini, P., Fabbri-Destro, M., Volta, R.D., Daprati, E., Rizzolatti, G., Cantalupo, G.: The dynamics of sensorimotor cortical oscillations during the observation of hand movements: an EEG study. PLoS ONE 7, e37534 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, H., Chavarriaga, R., Khaliliardali, Z., Gheorghe, L., Iturrate, I., Millán, Jd.R.: EEG-based decoding of error-related brain activity in a real-world driving task. J. Neural Eng. 12, 066028 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066028

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a CAMLIN Limited and Toyota Motor Europe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Vecchiato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vecchiato, G. et al. (2020). Alpha and Beta EEG Desynchronizations Anticipate Steering Actions in a Driving Simulation Experiment. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Vergnano, A., Leali, F., Taiar, R. (eds) Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2020. IHSI 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics