Skip to main content

A Generative Adversarial Network Based Ensemble Technique for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Synthesized Speech

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Recognition (ACPR 2019)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a method to automatically compute a speech evaluation metric, Virtual Mean Opinion Score (vMOS) for the speech generated by Text-to-Speech (TTS) models to analyse its human-ness. In contrast to the currently used manual speech evaluation techniques, the proposed method uses an end-to-end neural network to calculate vMOS which is qualitatively similar to manually obtained Mean Opinion Score (MOS). The Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and a binary classifier have been trained on real natural speech with known MOS. Further, the vMOS has been calculated by averaging the scores obtained by the two networks. In this work, the input to GAN’s discriminator is conditioned with the speech generated by off-the-shelf TTS models so as to get closer to the natural speech. It has been shown that the proposed model can be trained with a minimum amount of data as its objective is to generate only the evaluation score and not speech. The proposed method has been tested to evaluate the speech synthesized by state-of-the-art TTS models and it has reported the vMOS of 0.6675, 0.4945 and 0.4890 for Wavenet2, Tacotron and Deepvoice3 respectively while the vMOS for natural speech is 0.6682 on a scale from 0 to 1. These vMOS scores correspond to and are qualitatively explained by their manually calculated MOS scores.

J. Jaiswal and A. Chaubey—Denotes equal contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://pytorch.org/.

References

  1. Arik, S.Ö., et al.: Deep voice: real-time neural text-to-speech. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 70, pp. 195–204. JMLR.org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, Y., et al.: Tacotron: towards end-to-end speech synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10135 (2017)

  3. Ping, W.: Deep voice 3: scaling text-to-speech with convolutional sequence learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.07654 (2017)

  4. van den Oord, A., et al.: Wavenet: a generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499 (2016)

  5. Salza, P.L., Foti, E., Nebbia, L., Oreglia, M.: MOS and pair comparison combined methods for quality evaluation of text-to-speech systems. Acta Acust. United Acust. 82(4), 650–656 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghate, P., Shirbahadurkar, S.D.: A survey on methods of TTS and various test for evaluating the quality of synthesized speech. Int. J. Dev. Res. 07, 15236–15239 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ito, K.: The LJ speech dataset (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Veaux, C., Yamagishi, J., MacDonald, K., et al.: CSTR VCTK corpus: English multi-speaker corpus for CSTR voice cloning toolkit. University of Edinburgh, The Centre for Speech Technology Research (CSTR) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Livingstone, S.R., Russo, F.A.: The Ryerson audio-visual database of emotional speech and song (RAVDESS): a dynamic, multimodal set of facial and vocal expressions in North American English. PloS One 13(5), e0196391 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Busso, C., et al.: IEMOCAP: interactive emotional dyadic motion capture database. Lang. Resour. Eval. 42(4), 335 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dwivedi, R.C., et al.: Acoustic parameters of speech: lack of correlation with perceptual and questionnaire-based speech evaluation in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated with primary surgery. Head Neck 38(5), 670–676 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sebastian, R.J., Ryan, E.B.: Speech cues and social evaluation: markers of ethnicity, social class, and age. In: Recent Advances in Language, Communication, and Social Psychology, pp. 112–143. Routledge (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tyagi, V., Ganapathiraju, A., Wyss, F.I.: Method and system for selectively biased linear discriminant analysis in automatic speech recognition systems. US Patent 9,679,556, 13 June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chorowski, J.K., Bahdanau, D., Serdyuk, D., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: Attention-based models for speech recognition. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 577–585 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gajic, B., Narayanan, S.S., Parthasarathy, S., Rose, R.C., Rosenberg, A.E.: System and method of performing user-specific automatic speech recognition. US Patent 9,058,810, 16 June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  16. Renals, S.: Automatic Speech Recognition-ASR Lecture: Multilingual Speech Recognition (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Russell, M., Cook, A.: Experimental evaluation of duration modelling techniques for automatic speech recognition. In: ICASSP 1987, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 12, pp. 2376–2379. IEEE (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, A.H., Parada, P.P., Naylor, P.A.: Speech enhancement for robust automatic speech recognition: evaluation using a baseline system and instrumental measures. Comput. Speech Lang. 46, 574–584 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Otani, T., Togawa, T., Nakayama, S.: Speech evaluation apparatus and speech evaluation method. US Patent App. 15/703,249, 29 March 2018

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sailor, H.B., Patil, H.A.: Fusion of magnitude and phase-based features for objective evaluation of TTS voice. In: The 9th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing, pp. 521–525. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goodfellow, I., et al.: Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2672–2680 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mirza, M., Osindero, S.: Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784 (2014)

  23. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization (2014). arxiv:1412.6980. Comment: Published as a Conference Paper at the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego (2015)

  24. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. CoRR, abs/1512.03385 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. An, S., Ling, Z., Dai, L.: Emotional statistical parametric speech synthesis using LSTM-RNNs. In: 2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), pp. 1613–1616. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaynil Jaiswal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 133 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jaiswal, J. et al. (2020). A Generative Adversarial Network Based Ensemble Technique for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Synthesized Speech. In: Palaiahnakote, S., Sanniti di Baja, G., Wang, L., Yan, W. (eds) Pattern Recognition. ACPR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12047. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41299-9_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41299-9_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41298-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41299-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics