Skip to main content

Linking Human Factors to Assess Human Reliability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics ((SPAR,volume 12))

Abstract

This study proposes a methodological review and an illustrative example for the Human Reliability Analysis. The paper deals with work-related stress and It discusses about the role of humans into manufacturing systems over automation control. A causal loop methodology is used to report the dynamic responses over time of humans at work. The Causal Loop is arranged inside a main framework which includes multi criteria decisions about main and subsidiaries concepts that influence the work-stress and the operations management. We chose the mapping method using expert, seniors and workers judgments and we demonstrated its utility in supporting decision for strategic operational goals. Factors and variables from the Human, Team, Work, Environment behavior are considered and declined in constant, measurable and depended elements with their inter and intra level connections. Contextualization in a safety based approach is reported. Findings are discussed with regard to a manufacturing set in terms of reliability management. We identified and modelled critical influencing factors for human reliability at work while discussing about human robotic interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J.D.: Understanding and Managing Stress: A Book of Readings. Universities Associates, San Diego (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Apolloni, S., Fera, M., Macchiaroli, R.: Proposal of a model for chemical risk. SAFE. WIT Transactions, Malta (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschoff, J.: Circadian rhythms in man. Science 148, 1427–1432 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basra, G., Kirwan, B.: Collection of offshore human error probability data. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 61, 77–93 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, H.S., Gertman, D.I., Boring, R.L.: Human error quantification using performance shaping factors in the SPAR-H method. In: 52nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, G.: Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 16, 55–58 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Tucker, P., Rapport, F., Hutchings, H., Dahlgren, A., Davies, G., Ebden, P.: The impact of shift patterns on junior doctors’ perceptions of fatigue, training, worklife balance and role of social. Qual. Saf. Health Care 19(6), 1–4 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciabue, P.C.: Human factors impact on risk analysis of complex system. J. Hazard. Mater. 71, 101–116 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombini, D., Occhipinti, E.: Results of risk and impairment assessment in groups of workers exposed to repetitive strain and movement of upper limbs in various sectors of industry. Med. Lavoro 95, 233–246 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Covey, S.R.: The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People. Franklin Covey Co. (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Czeisler, C.A., Gooley, J.J.: Sleep and circadian rhythms in humans. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 72, 579–597 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D., Reid, K.: Fatigue, alcohol and performance impairment. Nature 338, 235 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W.E.: Out of the Crisis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Giulio, A., Trucco, P., Invernizzi, F., Citterio, S.: Affidabilità cognitiva dell.operatore umano e sicurezza d.impianto: prospettive di integrazione nei metodi d’analisi. ANIMP (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Pasquale, V., Miranda, S., Iannone, R., Riemma, S.: A simulator for human error probability analysis (SHERPA). Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 139, 17–32 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Pasquale, V., Fruggiero, F., Iannone, R., Miranda, S.: A model for break scheduling assessment in manufacturing systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 111, 563–580 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, E.: Human errors of commission revisited: an evaluation of ATHEANA approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 60, 71–82 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, E.: Is human failure a stochastic process? Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 58, 209–215 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ahrache, K., Imbeau, D., Farbos, B.: Percentile values for determining maximum endurance times for static muscular work. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 36(2), 99–108 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fera, M., Macchiaroli, R.: Appraisal of a new risk assessment model for SME. Saf. Sci. 48, 1361–1368 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fera, M., Macchiaroli, R., Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, L.: Risks prioritization in decision making for wind energy investments using analytic network process (ANP). Appl. Eng. Res. 12, 2567–2574 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruggiero, F., Fera, M., Iannone, R., Lambiase, A.: Work control in balanced DRC systems supported by negotiation procedures between autonomous agents. IFAC-Papers Online 48(3), 733–740 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruggiero, F., Riemma, S., Ouazene, Y., Macchiaroli, R., Guglielmi, V.: Incorporating the human factor within the manufacturing dynamics. IFAC PapersOnline 49(12), 1691–1696 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruggiero, F., Fera, M., Lambiase, A., Miranda, S.: What humans act in robotic surgery. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuhama, Y., Furuta, K., Kondo, S.: Identification of causes of human errors in support of the development of computer-assisted instruction systems for the plant operator training. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 47, 75–84 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., Heberger, J.R.: Examining the interaction of force and repetition on musculoskeletal disorder risk: a systematic literature review. Hum. Factors 55(1), 108–124 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertman, D.I., Blackman, H.S.: Human Reliability & Safety Analysis Data Handbook. Wiley, New York (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guyton, A.C.: Human Physiology and Mechanisms of Disease, 5th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J.R., Vidmar, N.: Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. In: Marlowe, L. (ed.) Basic Topics in Social Psuchology. Holbrook Press, Boston (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallbert, B.P., Gertmann, D.I.: Using information from operating experience to inform human reliability analysis. In: International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, S.: Dependencies, human interactions and uncertainties. Final report of NKS/RAS-470 project, ABB Atom (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E.: Reliability analysis and operator modelling. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 52, 327–337 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E.: Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method: CREAM. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E.: Looking for errors of omission and commission or The Hunting of the Snark revisited. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 68, 135–145 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, J., Hukki, K., Norros, L., Pulkkinen, U., Pyy, P.: An integrated approach to human reliability—decision analytic dynamic reliability model. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 65, 239–250 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannone, R., Miranda, S., Riemma, S.: Proposta di un modello per la determinazione automatica delle pause di lavoro in attività manifatturiere a prevalente contenuto manuale. In: Proceedings of ANIMP – Treviso, pp. 46–60 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, P.C., Hu, K., Hilton, M.F., Shea, S.A., Stanley, H.E.: Endogenous circadian rhythm in human motor activity uncoupled from circadian influences on cardiac dynamic. PNAS 104(52), 20702–20707 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.: Why human error modeling has failed to help systems development. Interact. Comput. 11, 517–524 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, B.W.: Group Size: Its Effects on Group Performance and on Individual Acquisition of Knowledge. Eastern Psychological convention, Washington, D.C. (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, W.D., Yoon, W.C., Kim, J.W.: Structured information analysis for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks in nuclear power plants. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(1), 21–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, I.S.: Human reliability analysis in the man-machine interface design review. Ann. Nucl. Energy 28(11), 1069–1081 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B.: Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 1: overview of approaches. Appl. Ergon. 23(5), 299–318 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B.: The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques — THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part 1 — technique descriptions and validation issues. Appl. Ergon. 27(6), 359–373 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B.: Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high risk system. Part 1: review and evaluation of techniques. Appl. Ergon. 29(3), 157–177 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, B., Gibson, H., Kennedy, R., Edmunds, J., Cooksley, G., Umbers, I.: Nuclear action reliability assessment (NARA): a data-based HRA tool. In: Spitzer, C., Schmocker, U., Dang, V.N. (eds.) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, pp. 1206–1211. Springer, London (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knisley, J.: Improve employee productivity with custom lighting. Electr. Constr. Maintenance 104, 34–40 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolus, A., Wells, R., Neumann, W.P.: Production quality and human factors engineering: a systematic review and theoretical framework. Appl. Ergon. 73, 55–89 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konz, S., Johnson, S.: Work Design-Occupational Ergonomics, 6th edn. Holcomb Hathaway, Scottsdale (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E.K., Hedge, A., Pavlovic-Vaselinovic, S.: Cognitive ergonomics, socio-technical systems, and the impact of the healthcare information technologies. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 41(4), 336–344 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savery, L., Luks, J.: The relationship between empowerment, job satisfaction and reported stress levels: some Australian evidence. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 22(3), 97–104 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S.: Stress, Appraisal and Coping. Springer, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S.E., Flower, D.J., Gerson, B., Hursh, S.R.: Fatigue risk management in the workplace. JOEM 54(2), 231–258 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, D.A., Folkard, S., Willetts, J.L., Smith, G.S.: Daily sleep, weekly working hours, and risk of work-related injury: US National Health Interview Survey (2004–2008). Chronobiol. Int. 27(5), 1013–1030 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P., Hollnagel, E.: Human interaction with technology: the accidental user. Acta Psychologica 91(3), 345–358 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, M.T., Ivancevich, J.M.: Controlling Work Stress: Effective Human Resource and Management Strategies. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24(2), 91–99 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: Rapid upper limb assessment (RULA). In: Stanton, N., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, 7–11. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsneron-Dupin, F., Reer, B., Heslinga, G., Strater, O., Gerdes, V., Saliu, G., Ullwer, W.: Human-centered modelling in human reliability analysis: some trends based on case studies. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 58(3), 249–274 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N.: Identifying mental models of complex human-machine systems. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 22, 293–297 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard, D.A., Osothsilp, N.: Task complexity effects on between-individual learning/forgetting variability. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 29(5), 297–306 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, W.P., Dul, J.: Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Appl. Ergon. 40(4), 745–752 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, W.P., Dul, J.: Human factors: spanning the gap between OM and HRM. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 30(9), 923–950 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebel, B.W., Freivalds, A.: Methods Standards and Work Design, 11th edn. McGraw Hill, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordin, M., Andersson, G.: Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Work Place: Principle and Practice, 2nd edn. Mosby-Year Book Inc., New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, K.S.: Human Reliability Analysis: Analysis, Prediction and Prevention of Human Errors. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami, S.N., Agarwal, S., Bhargava, M.: Work alienation of marketing employees: influence of task, supervisory, and organizational structure factors. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 21(3), 179–183 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J.: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27(2–3), 183–213 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau, R.: Psychophysiological assessment of human reliability in a simulated complex system. Biol. Psychol. 42(3), 287–300 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richei, A., Hauptmanns, U., Unger, H.: The human error rate assessment and optimizing system HEROS—a new procedure for evaluating and optimizing the man-machine interface in PSA. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 72(2), 153–164 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, M.L., Knight, P.A.: The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational and beliefs and attitudes: a causal model. J. Appl. Psychol. 79(5), 755–766 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohmert, W.: Problems in determining rest allowances, Part 2: determining rest allowances in different tasks. Appl. Ergon. 4(3), 158–162 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L., Hu, G.: Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Appl. Math. Lett. 11(4), 121–125 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L.: Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy proces. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–97 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammarco, M., Fruggiero, F., Neumann, W.P., Lambiase, A.: Agent-based modeling of movement rules in DRC systems for volume flexibility: human factors and technical performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(3), 633–650 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherkenbach, W.: The Deming Route to Quality and Productivity: Road Maps and Roadblocks. CEEP Press, George Washington University, Washington DC (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrock, S.T., Kirwan, B.: Development and application of a human error identification tool for air traffic control. Appl. Ergon. 33, 319–336 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, C.R., Szewczak, E.J.: Human Factors Information System. IGI Global, Hershey (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snook, S., Ciriello, V.: The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 34(9), 1197–1213 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, N.A., Hedge, A., Brookhuis, K., Salas, E., Hendrick, H.: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. CRC Press, London (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I.D.: Group Process and Productivity. Academic Press, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J.D.: Business Dynamics - Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strater, O., Bubb, H.: Assessment of human reliability based on evaluation of plant experience: requirements and implementation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 63, 199–219 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sträter, O., Dang, V., Kaufer, B., Daniels, A.: On the way to assess errors of commission. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83(2), 129–138 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dieen, J.H., Oude Vrielink, H.H.E.: The use of relation between relative force and endurance time. Ergonomics 37(2), 231–243 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen, F.: A non-probabilistic prospective and retrospective human reliability analysis method - application to railway system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(1), 1–13 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Village, J., Greig, M., Salustri, F.A., Neumann, W.P.: Linking human factors to corporate strategy with cognitive mapping techniques. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 43(4), 304–313 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., Fine, L.: Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7), 749–776 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D.M.: Stress and mental control. In: Reason, S., Fisher, J. (eds.) Handbook of Life, Stress, Cognition and Health, pp. 685–699. Wiley, Hoboken (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.C.: A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance. In: IEEE Conference on Human Factors in Power Plants, Monterey, California, 5–9 June, pp. 436–450 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.R., Corlett, E.N.: Evaluation of Human Work. Taylor & Francis, London (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wittingham, R.B.: The Blame Machine: Why Human Error Causes Accidents. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Burlington (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T.J.: Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 3(4), 22–128 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, F., Bingquan, Z., Shengyao, J.: Cognitive model research of nuclear power plant operators. Nucl. Eng. Des. 215(3), 251–256 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeow, J., Ng, P.K., Sin Tan, K., Chin, T., Yin Lim, W.: Effects of stress, repetition, fatigue and work environment on human error in manufacturing industries. J. Appl. Sci. 14, 3464–3471 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Fruggiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

We used questionnaires to collect information from the field. Workers, from the assembly division, were invited to select the appropriate response according to their own sensation at work. Managers were asked for choosing the importance of a particular factor in order to test the variable under investigation. Physician selected the appropriate role among concepts. The answers were elaborated according to the ANP approach with consistency verification. Here is reported a sample of how worker replied. The module is attached in order to guarantee repeatability in the interested analysis. Numerical points are included for illustration - those can be chosen from a list of guided responses.

figure a
figure b

Main List of Acronyms -

Distinguished in categories and, inside those, arranged in alphabetic order

  • Fundamentals of main methodology

  • Tools for Human Reliability Assessment

  • Variables for main functions

FUNDAMENTALs

ANP

Analytic Network Process

CLD

Causal Loop Diagram

DoE

Design of Experiment

HF

Human Factor

HFM

Human Factor Management

HRA

Human Reliability Assessment

MALBP

Mixed model Approach for Line Balancing Problem

OM

Operations Management

PSF

Principal Shaping Factor

SD

System Dynamics

MAIN VARIABLEs

a

allowance rate

C

Comparison Matrix

D

Decision vector

j kil

judgment of decision K compared with I as per expert L

L max

Fatigue max

MET

Maximum Endurance Time

MVC

Maximum Load Contraction

N

Negative influence in CLD

P

Positive influence in CLD

P/N

Positive AND Negative influence in CLD

p i

priority of decision factor i

R

Reliability %

RA

Rest Allowance

λ

failure rate

TOOLs

ACIH

Analysis of Consequences of Human Unreliability

(translated from French acronyms)

ATHENA

A Technique for Human Error aNAlysis

CoCoM

Contextual Control Model

CREAM

Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method

DUA

Decision on Unrequired Action

HEART

Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique

HEP

Human Error Probability

JHEDI

Justified Human Error Data Information

NARA

Nuclear Action Reliability Assessment

OOP

Operations Optimization Problem

OSHA

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

PRA

Probabilistic Risk Analysis

PSA

Probabilistic Safety Assessment

RULA

Rapid Upper Limb Analysis

RWL

Recommended Weight Limit

S&C

Snook and Ciriello (S&C)

SCEBRA

SCEnario Based Risk Assessment

SIA

Structured Information Analysis

SLIM-Mud

Success Likelihood Index Methodology, Multi-attribute

utility decomposition

SOR

Stimulus, Organism, Response

SPAR-H

Standardized Plant Analysis Risk–Human reliability analysis

THERP

Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fruggiero, F., Fera, M., Lambiase, A., Di Pasquale, V. (2020). Linking Human Factors to Assess Human Reliability. In: Ferraguti, F., Villani, V., Sabattini, L., Bonfè, M. (eds) Human-Friendly Robotics 2019. HFR 2019. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42026-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics