Skip to main content

A Quantitative and Comparative Analysis of Edge Detectors for Biomedical Image Identification Within Dynamical Noise Effect

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2020)

Abstract

Image processing plays a key role in many medical imaging applications, by automation and making delineation of regions of interest more simple. The paper describes image processing such as image properties, noise generators and edge detectors. The work deals with methods of edge detection in biomedical images using real data sets. The aim of this work are experiments providing information about the detector noise resistance. Another aim is own implementation of selected edge detection operators and an application on different types of data created by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Theoretical and experimental comparisons of edge detectors are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aslam, A., Khan, E., Beg, M.S.: Improved edge detection algorithm for brain tumor segmentation. Proced. Comput. Sci. 58, 430–437 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berezsky, O., Pitsun, O., Verbovyy, S., Datsko, T., Bodnar, A.: Computer diagnostic tools based on biomedical image analysis. In: 2017 14th International Conference The Experience of Designing and Application of CAD Systems in Microelectronics (CADSM), pp. 388–391. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyat, A.K., Joshi, B.K.: A review paper: noise models in digital image processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.03489 (2015)

  4. Canny, J.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6, 679–698 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaple, G.N., Daruwala, R.D., Gofane, M.S.: Comparisions of robert, prewitt, sobel operator based edge detection methods for real time uses on FPGA. In: 2015 International Conference on Technologies for Sustainable Development (ICTSD), pp. 1–4. IEEE, Mumbai, February 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTSD.2015.7095920

  6. Farooque, M.A., Rohankar, J.S.: Survey on various noises and techniques for denoising the color image. Int. J. Appl. Innov. Eng. Manage. (IJAIEM) 2(11), 217–221 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jain, P., Tyagi, V.: A survey of edge-preserving image denoising methods. Inform. Syst. Front. 18(1), 159–170 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9527-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kovalevsky, V.: Edge detection. In: Modern Algorithms for Image Processing, pp. 87–99. Apress, Berkeley (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kubicek, J., Penhaker, M., Augustynek, M., Cerny, M., Oczka, D.: Segmentation of articular cartilage and early osteoarthritis based on the fuzzy soft thresholding approach driven by modified evolutionary abc optimization and local statistical aggregation. Symmetry 11(7), 861 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kubicek, J., Tomanec, F., Cerny, M., Vilimek, D., Kalova, M., Oczka, D.: Recent trends, technical concepts and components of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery systems: a comprehensive review. Sensors 19(23), 5199 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kubicek, J., et al.: Prediction model of alcohol intoxication from facial temperature dynamics based on k-means clustering driven by evolutionary computing. Symmetry 11(8), 995 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lakhani, K., Minocha, B., Gugnani, N.: Analyzing edge detection techniques for feature extraction in dental radiographs. Perspect. Sci. 8, 395–398 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maini, R., Aggarwal, H.: Study and comparison of various image edge detection techniques. Int. J. Image Process. (IJIP) 3(1), 1–11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marr, D., Hildreth, E.: Theory of edge detection. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 207(1167), 187–217 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Naam, J., Harlan, J., Madenda, S., Wibowo, E.P.: The algorithm of image edge detection on panoramic dental X-Ray using multiple morphological gradient (MMG) method. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inform. Technol. 6(6), 1012–1018 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolic, M., Tuba, E., Tuba, M.: Edge detection in medical ultrasound images using adjusted Canny edge detection algorithm. In: 2016 24th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), pp. 1–4. IEEE, Belgrade, November 2016

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pham, D.L., Xu, C., Prince, J.L.: Current Methods in Medical Image Segmentation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2(1), 315–337 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rangayyan, R.M.: Biomedical Image Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Saini, P.K., Singh, M.: Brain tumor detection in medical imaging using MATLAB. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2(02), 191–196 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shrivakshan, G.T., Chandrasekar, C.: A comparison of various edge detection techniques used in image processing. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues (IJCSI) 9(5), 269 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sonka, M., Hlavac, V., Boyle, R.: Image processing, analysis, and machine vision, 3rd edn. Thompson Learning, Toronto (2008). oCLC: ocn123776599

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spontón, H., Cardelino, J.: A review of classic edge detectors. Image Process. Line 5, 90–123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5201/ipol.2015.35

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work and the contributions were supported by the project SV450994/2101Biomedical Engineering Systems XV’. This study was also supported by the research project The Czech Science Foundation (GACR) 2017 No. 17-03037S Investment evaluation of medical device development run at the Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. This study was supported by the research project The Czech Science Foundation (TACR) ETA No. TL01000302 Medical Devices development as an effective investment for public and private entities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Vilimek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vilimek, D. et al. (2020). A Quantitative and Comparative Analysis of Edge Detectors for Biomedical Image Identification Within Dynamical Noise Effect. In: Nguyen, N., Jearanaitanakij, K., Selamat, A., Trawiński, B., Chittayasothorn, S. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42058-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42058-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42057-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42058-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics