Abstract
Increasing attention is being paid to the usability of public administration websites. Websites of this kind should offer appropriate functionality as well as being accessible to their users. This, among other things, is due to the many regulations introduced by countries’ governments. The aim of this paper is to present the most common usability errors identified on the websites of public administration units and the preliminary results of the assessment of the usability of Polish twenty largest cities’ Public Information Bulletin websites with the use of the heuristic evaluation. The study was conducted according to the heuristics method proposed by J. Nielsen. The main groups of errors affecting the usability of such websites were identified. Each of the error groups was assessed by an expert in terms of its importance for the overall assessment of the website’s usefulness. On this basis, the categories were assigned ranks from 1 to 5. This enabled indicating errors on the websites under study, as well as performing a comparison of the websites of the Public Information Bulletin of selected cities. The contribution of the article consists in the proposal of fourteen categories of heuristics for testing the usability and accessibility of public administration websites. The article presents a survey of public administration websites (on the example of the Public Information Bulletin in Poland) using the proposed heuristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: Introduction to Usability (2012). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
Introduction to Web Accessibility – Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) – W3C. https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro. Accessed 14 Dec 2019
Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion – Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) – W3C. https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion. Accessed 14 Dec 2019
Streich, S.: Accessibility is NOT just for people with disabilities (2019). https://vimm.com/website-accessibility. Accessed 1 May 2019
Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April (1997). http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19970780483. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
Act on Access to Public Information (2001). http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20011121198&type=3. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
Searchmetrics, Website Definition (2019). https://www.searchmetrics.com/glossary/website. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
Gąsiorkiewicz, A.: Main factors for web traffic level in B2C E-commerce websites and their impact on conversion ratio. In: Łongiewska-Wijas, E. (ed.) E-gospodarka w Polsce Stan obecny i perspektywy rozwoju, vol. 597, pp. 637–645. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin (2010)
Waddell, C., et al.: Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Apress Publishing House, New York (2003)
Khalid, H., Hedge, A., Ahram, T.: Advances in Ergonomics Modeling and Usability Evaluation. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)
ISO 9241-210:2019(en) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2019). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-2:v1:en. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
ISO/IEC 25010:2011(en) Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models (2011). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:25010:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
Quiñones, D., Rusu, C.: How to develop usability heuristics: a systematic literature review. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 53, 89–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.03.009
Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Rusu, V., Collazos, C.A.: Developing SMASH: a set of smartphone’s usability heuristics. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 43, 40–52 (2016)
Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability evaluation methods for the web: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(8), 789–817 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007
Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)
Paz, F., Pow-Sang, J.A.: A systematic mapping review of usability evaluation methods for software development process. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 10(1), 165–178 (2016)
Scholtz, J.: Usability evaluation (2004). http://notification.etisalat.com.eg/etisalat/templates.backup.16082011/582/Usability%2520Evaluation_rev1%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2018
Philips, M.: Elevate Your UX with a Heuristic Analysis – How to Run a Usability Evaluation (2017). https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/elevate-your-ux-heuristic-analysis-how-run-miklos-philips. Accessed 15 Sept 2018
Gerhardt-Powals, J.: Cognitive engineering principles for enhancing human-computer performance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 8(2), 189–211 (1996)
Weinschenk, S., Barker, D.T.: Designing Effective Speech Interfaces. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)
Shneiderman, B.: The Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design. Designing the User Interface, 6th edn. Pearson, London (2006). Section 3.3.4
Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Jimenez, C., Rusu, V.: Usability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices. IEEE Xplore (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2012.134
Tognazzini, B.: First Principles of Interaction Design (Revised & Expanded). askTog (2014). https://asktog.com/atc/principles-of-interaction-design. Accessed 9 May 2019
Douglas, S.: 7 Usability Heuristics That All UI Designers Should Know. Usability Geek (2017). https://usabilitygeek.com/usability-heuristics-ui-designers-know. Accessed 19 Jan 2019
Jimenez, C., Lozada, P., Rosas, P.: Usability heuristics: a systematic review. In: 11th Colombian Computing Conference, Popayan, Colombia, 27–30 September 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ColumbianCC.2016.7750805
Dourado, M.A.D., Canedo E.D.: Usability heuristics for mobile applications – a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS’ 2018), vol. 2, pp. 483–494 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006781404830494
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. – 29 U.S.C. § 798. Section 508 – Electronic and Information Technology. https://www.fcc.gov/general/section-508-rehabilitation-act. Accessed 20 Feb 2019
Barrierefreie Informationstechnik-Verordnung – BITV 2.0. https://www.barrierefreies-webdesign.de/bitv/bitv-2.0.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2019
Accessibilità siti web. AgID promuove l’accessibilità dei siti web in relazione alla normativa vigente. https://www.agid.gov.it/it/design-servizi/accessibilita-siti-web. Accessed 20 Feb 2019
Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 12 April 2012, on the National Interoperability Framework. http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20120000526. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
Information for PIB editors. https://www.bip.gov.pl/articles/view/43. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
Central Statistical Office of 31 December 2015. https://stat.gov.pl/statystyka-regionalna/rankingi-statystyczne/miasta-najwieksze-pod-wzgledem-liczby-ludnosci. Accessed 20 Sept 2018
Krawiec, Ł., Dudycz, H.: Identification of heuristics for assessing the usability of websites of public administration units. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2019 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Leipzig, 1–4 September 2019, pp. 651–657 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15439/2019F307
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krawiec, Ł., Dudycz, H. (2020). Using Heuristics for Assessing the Usability of the Public Information Bulletins in Poland. In: Ziemba, E. (eds) Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions. AITM ISM 2019 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 380. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43352-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43353-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)