Skip to main content

Using Heuristics for Assessing the Usability of the Public Information Bulletins in Poland

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 564 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 380))

Abstract

Increasing attention is being paid to the usability of public administration websites. Websites of this kind should offer appropriate functionality as well as being accessible to their users. This, among other things, is due to the many regulations introduced by countries’ governments. The aim of this paper is to present the most common usability errors identified on the websites of public administration units and the preliminary results of the assessment of the usability of Polish twenty largest cities’ Public Information Bulletin websites with the use of the heuristic evaluation. The study was conducted according to the heuristics method proposed by J. Nielsen. The main groups of errors affecting the usability of such websites were identified. Each of the error groups was assessed by an expert in terms of its importance for the overall assessment of the website’s usefulness. On this basis, the categories were assigned ranks from 1 to 5. This enabled indicating errors on the websites under study, as well as performing a comparison of the websites of the Public Information Bulletin of selected cities. The contribution of the article consists in the proposal of fourteen categories of heuristics for testing the usability and accessibility of public administration websites. The article presents a survey of public administration websites (on the example of the Public Information Bulletin in Poland) using the proposed heuristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: Introduction to Usability (2012). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  2. Introduction to Web Accessibility – Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) – W3C. https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro. Accessed 14 Dec 2019

  3. Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion – Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) – W3C. https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion. Accessed 14 Dec 2019

  4. Streich, S.: Accessibility is NOT just for people with disabilities (2019). https://vimm.com/website-accessibility. Accessed 1 May 2019

  5. Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April (1997). http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19970780483. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  6. Act on Access to Public Information (2001). http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20011121198&type=3. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  7. Searchmetrics, Website Definition (2019). https://www.searchmetrics.com/glossary/website. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  8. Gąsiorkiewicz, A.: Main factors for web traffic level in B2C E-commerce websites and their impact on conversion ratio. In: Łongiewska-Wijas, E. (ed.) E-gospodarka w Polsce Stan obecny i perspektywy rozwoju, vol. 597, pp. 637–645. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Waddell, C., et al.: Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Apress Publishing House, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khalid, H., Hedge, A., Ahram, T.: Advances in Ergonomics Modeling and Usability Evaluation. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO 9241-210:2019(en) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2019). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-2:v1:en. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  12. ISO/IEC 25010:2011(en) Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models (2011). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:25010:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  13. Quiñones, D., Rusu, C.: How to develop usability heuristics: a systematic literature review. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 53, 89–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Rusu, V., Collazos, C.A.: Developing SMASH: a set of smartphone’s usability heuristics. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 43, 40–52 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability evaluation methods for the web: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(8), 789–817 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paz, F., Pow-Sang, J.A.: A systematic mapping review of usability evaluation methods for software development process. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 10(1), 165–178 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scholtz, J.: Usability evaluation (2004). http://notification.etisalat.com.eg/etisalat/templates.backup.16082011/582/Usability%2520Evaluation_rev1%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2018

  19. Philips, M.: Elevate Your UX with a Heuristic Analysis – How to Run a Usability Evaluation (2017). https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/elevate-your-ux-heuristic-analysis-how-run-miklos-philips. Accessed 15 Sept 2018

  20. Gerhardt-Powals, J.: Cognitive engineering principles for enhancing human-computer performance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 8(2), 189–211 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinschenk, S., Barker, D.T.: Designing Effective Speech Interfaces. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shneiderman, B.: The Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design. Designing the User Interface, 6th edn. Pearson, London (2006). Section 3.3.4

    Google Scholar 

  23. Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Jimenez, C., Rusu, V.: Usability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices. IEEE Xplore (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2012.134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tognazzini, B.: First Principles of Interaction Design (Revised & Expanded). askTog (2014). https://asktog.com/atc/principles-of-interaction-design. Accessed 9 May 2019

  25. Douglas, S.: 7 Usability Heuristics That All UI Designers Should Know. Usability Geek (2017). https://usabilitygeek.com/usability-heuristics-ui-designers-know. Accessed 19 Jan 2019

  26. Jimenez, C., Lozada, P., Rosas, P.: Usability heuristics: a systematic review. In: 11th Colombian Computing Conference, Popayan, Colombia, 27–30 September 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ColumbianCC.2016.7750805

  27. Dourado, M.A.D., Canedo E.D.: Usability heuristics for mobile applications – a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS’ 2018), vol. 2, pp. 483–494 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006781404830494

  28. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. – 29 U.S.C. § 798. Section 508 – Electronic and Information Technology. https://www.fcc.gov/general/section-508-rehabilitation-act. Accessed 20 Feb 2019

  29. Barrierefreie Informationstechnik-Verordnung – BITV 2.0. https://www.barrierefreies-webdesign.de/bitv/bitv-2.0.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2019

  30. Accessibilità siti web. AgID promuove l’accessibilità dei siti web in relazione alla normativa vigente. https://www.agid.gov.it/it/design-servizi/accessibilita-siti-web. Accessed 20 Feb 2019

  31. Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 12 April 2012, on the National Interoperability Framework. http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20120000526. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  32. Information for PIB editors. https://www.bip.gov.pl/articles/view/43. Accessed 1 Dec 2019

  33. Central Statistical Office of 31 December 2015. https://stat.gov.pl/statystyka-regionalna/rankingi-statystyczne/miasta-najwieksze-pod-wzgledem-liczby-ludnosci. Accessed 20 Sept 2018

  34. Krawiec, Ł., Dudycz, H.: Identification of heuristics for assessing the usability of websites of public administration units. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2019 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Leipzig, 1–4 September 2019, pp. 651–657 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15439/2019F307

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Łukasz Krawiec .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Krawiec, Ł., Dudycz, H. (2020). Using Heuristics for Assessing the Usability of the Public Information Bulletins in Poland. In: Ziemba, E. (eds) Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions. AITM ISM 2019 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 380. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43352-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43353-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics