Abstract
In the so-called ‘post-truth’ era the need for skills that allow (digital) information to be critically evaluated has garnered considerable attention and discussion. In the library and LIS domains, researchers, librarians, and libraries have recurrently and strongly argued to play important roles in the effort to solve the many challenges offered by increasingly mundane-ified, invisible, and powerful online information infrastructures. Little is known, however, about the proliferation of such arguments in broader societal debate and dialogue. The empirical basis if this paper is an analysis of 100 news articles published by major Swedish and Norwegian media outlets mentioning the term “source criticism”. The analysis focused on (1) what is being talked about in conjunction with the notion of source criticism; and (2) who is talking with authority on the topic of source criticism. Of particular interest was the extent to which libraries, librarians, and LIS are ascribed important and authoritative positions in the discussions. The findings showed that although libraries are referenced in some of the articles, neither the library sector as such nor LIS research has any sort of meaningful presence in public discourse on misinformation, disinformation, and other negative information trends. The stark difference between how the positions and possible contributions of libraries, library professionals, and LIS research are rendered in public and professional and academic library discourses is a significant hindrance for the library research and practice domains to realize their manifold productive potential of in the larger context of present-day information machineries, politics, and culture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
As mentioned above there are a few librarians figuring as professional experts in the material, but these do not represent LIS or any neighboring academic fields.
References
Andersen, J.: Archiving, ordering, and searching: search engines, algorithms, databases, and deep mediatization. Media Cult. Soc. 40(8), 1135–1150 (2018)
Andersson, C.: “Google is not fun”: an investigation of how Swedish teenagers frame online searching. J. Doc. 73(6), 1244–1260 (2017)
Charmaz, K.: The grounded theory method: an explication and interpretation. In: Contemporary Field Research, pp. 109–126. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights (1983)
Chen, X., Sin, S.-C.J., Theng, Y.-L., Lee, C.S.: Why students share misinformation on social media: motivation, gender, and study-level differences. J. Acad. Librariansh. 41(5), 583–592 (2015)
Chen, Y., Conroy, N.J., Rubin, V.L.: News in an online world: the need for an “automatic crap detector”. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(1), 1–4 (2015)
Cooke, N.A.: Posttruth, truthiness, and alternative facts: information behavior and critical Information consumption for a new age. Libr. Q. 87(3), 211–221 (2017)
Drobnicki, J.A., Asaro, R.: Historical fabrications on the Internet. Ref. Libr. 35(74), 121–164 (2001)
Fallis, D.: What is disinformation? Libr. Trends 63(3), 401–426 (2015)
Fichtelius, E., Persson, C., Enarson, E.: Demokratins skattkammare: Förslag till en nationell biblioteksstrategi. Kungliga biblioteket, Stockholm (2019)
Fitzgerald, M.: Misinformation on the internet: applying evaluation skills to online information. Emerg. Libr. 24, 9–14 (1997)
Floridi, L.: Brave.Net.World: the internet as a disinformation super-highway? Electron. Libr. 14(6), 509–514 (1996)
Haider, J., Sundin, O.: Invisible Search and Online Search Engines: The Ubiquity of Search in Everyday Life. Routledge, Abingdon (2019)
Harvard: Fake news, misinformation, and propaganda (2017). https://guides.library.harvard.edu/fakeadu/fake. Accessed 16 Sept 2019
Huvila, I.: Affective capitalism of knowing and the society of search engine. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 68(5), 566–588 (2016)
Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2004)
Lenker, M.: Motivated reasoning, political information, and information literacy education. Portal: Libr. Acad. 16(3), 511–528 (2016)
Lewandowski, D.: Search engine user behaviour: how can users be guided to quality content? Inf. Serv. Use 28(3–4), 261–268 (2008)
Lewandowski, D.: Web Search Engine Research. Emerald, Bingley (2012)
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K.H., Cook, J.: Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 6(4), 353–369 (2017)
Rieh, S.Y.: On the web at home: information seeking and web searching in the home environment. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55(8), 743–753 (2004)
Sullivan, M.C.: Why librarians can’t fight fake news. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. 51(4), 1146–1156 (2018)
Sundin, O.: The search-ification of everyday life and the mundane-ification of search. J. Doc. 73(2), 224–243 (2017)
Walsh, J.: Librarians and controlling disinformation: is multi-literacy instruction the answer? Libr. Rev. 59(7), 498–511 (2010)
IFLA: How to spot fake news (2019). https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11174. Accessed 16 Sept 2019
Ministry of culture: Rom for demokrati og dannelse Nasjonal bibliotekstrategi 2020–2023. Kulturdepartementet, Oslo (2019)
Norwegian Library Association: Oppdag falske nyheter: How to spot fake news (2017). https://norskbibliotekforening.no/2017/03/oppdag-falske-nyheter-how-to-spot-fake-news. Accessed 16 Sept 2019
Steensen, S.: Journalism’s epistemic crisis and its solution: disinformation, datafication and source criticism. Journalism 20(1), 185–189 (2018). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1464884918809271
Sundin, O., Haider, J.: Källkritik, självkritik och källtillit. In: Carlsson, U. (ed.) Medie- och informationskunnighet i den digitala tidsåldern - en demokratifråga: Kartläggning, analyser, reflektioner, pp. 59–61. Nordicom, Göteborg (2018)
Wikipedia Contributors: Källkritik (2019). https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A4llkritik. Accessed 16 Sept 2019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tallerås, K., Sköld, O. (2020). What They Talk About When They Talk About the Need for Critical Evaluation of Information Sources: An Analysis of Norwegian and Swedish News Articles Mentioning ‘Source Criticism’. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43686-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43687-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)