Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Records-Making During Crisis Management – Rule Based or Discretion Driven?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Digital Communities (iConference 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12051))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

During large crises, e.g. forest fires, flooding, terrorist attacks, or aircraft crashes, temporal organizations are set up to manage the crisis and minimize negative impacts on society. These temporal organizations are often called situation rooms. The purpose of this paper is to study what regulates the record-making practice in a police situation room. Qualitative research methods were used. Data was sourced from five different case studies in the Swedish police service. The tension between discretion and rule-based regulation has been used as the theoretical lens in this paper. Through the application of this theoretical lens of regulation, whereby the two extremes found were discretionary creation on the one hand and rule-based creation on the other, one can identify a real challenge in record-making practice. Much of the record-making was regulated discretionary, i.e. each regulated and motivated by a police officer’s own judgment. This kind of record-making is difficult to predict and consequently the created records may also be difficult to capture, simply because no-one knows that they exist. In non-temporal organizations’ recordkeeping practice, entire work processes can be identified, the records created in the processes can be identified in advance and the process can be supported by various information systems. But in the temporal organization, proactivity is more difficult to achieve and thus records created based upon discretion will probably not be proactively identified as being part of an activity in a process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discretion.

References

  1. Bohn, M.K.: Nerve Center: Inside the White House Situation Room. Brassey’s, Washington, D.C. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap: Ansvar, samverkan, handling: åtgärder för stärkt krisberedskap utifrån erfarenheterna från skogsbranden i Västmanland 2014. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap, Stockholm (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Skogsbrandsutredningen: Rapport från Skogsbrandsutredningen. In: Regeringskansliet (ed.). Regeringen (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Landgren, J.: “Glöm inte dokumentera!” Hantering av dokumentation vid krishantering. vol. MSB 315. MSB (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borglund, E.A.M., Öberg, L.-M.: How are records used by organizations? Inf. Res. 13 (2008). Paper 341 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borglund, E.A.M.: Electronic records use changes through temporal rhythms. Arch. Soc. Stud.: J. Interdisc. Res. 2, 103–134 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sundqvist, A.: The use of records – a literature review. Arch. Soc. Stud.: J. Interdisc. Res. 1, 623–653 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Valtonen, M.R.: Documentation in pre-trial investigation: a study of using the records continuum model as a record management tool. Rec. Manag. J. 17, 179–185 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kostiainen, E., Valtonen, M.R., Vakkari, P.: Information seeking in pre-trial investigation with particular reference to records management. Arch. Sci. 3, 157–176 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schellenberg, T.R.: Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. SAA (Original work published 1956), Chicago (1956/1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foscarini, F.: Organizational records as genres: an analysis of the “Documentary Reality” of organizations from the perspectives of diplomatics, records management, and rhetorical genre studies. In: Theory in Information Studies, pp. 115–132 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foscarini, F.: Diplomatics and genre theory as complementary approaches. Arch. Sci. 12, 389–409 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9173-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foscarini, F.: Understanding the context of records creation and use: ‘Hard’ versus ‘soft’ approaches to records management. Arch. Sci. 10, 389–407 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9132-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahlén, T.: Informationsförvaltning i offentlig och privat sektor. Näringslivets arkivråd, Stockholm (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sahlén, T.: Kaos eller struktur - om modern dokumenthantering. In: Sundqvist, A. (ed.) Dokumentstyrning i processorienterade organisationer, pp. 7–56. Folkrörelsernas arkivförbund & Näringslivets arkivråd, Stockholm (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Upward, F.: The records continuum. In: McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Barbara, R., Upward, F. (eds.) Archives: Recordkeeping in Society, pp. 197–222. Charles Sturt University, Centre for Information Studies, Wagga Wagga (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Upward, F.: Modeling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond - a personal reflection. Rec. Manag. J. 10, 115–139 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Borglund, E.A.M.: Design for recordkeeping: areas of improvement. Department of Information Technology and Media, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borglund, E.: A first step towards general quality requirements for e-records. In: Nilsson, A.G., Gustas, R., Wojtkowski, W.G., Wojtkowski, W., Wrycza, S., Zupancic, J. (eds.) Advances in Information Systems Development: Bridging the Gap Between Academia & Industry, pp. 745–756. Springer, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36402-5_64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Borglund, E.: Operational use of electronic records in police work. Inf. Res. 10 (2005). Paper 236

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pettersson, M., Randall, D., Helgeson, B.: Ambiguities, awareness and economy: a study of emergency service work. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work 13, 125–154 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COSU.0000045707.37815.d1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heath, C., Luff, P.: Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work 1, 69–94 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Filippi, G., Theureau, J.: Analyzing cooperative work in an urban traffic control room for the design of a coordination support system. In: de Michelis, G., Simone, C., Schmidt, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 13–17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ECSCW 1993, pp. 171–186. Springer, Dordrecht (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2094-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Luff, P., Heath, C.: The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. Int. J. Hum.-Comput Stud. 52, 669–699 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Department of Defense: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. In: Department of Defense (ed.) Department of Defense (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. FEMA - Emergency Management Institute: National Incident Management System (NIMS) Student Manual IS-700.A. Communication and Information Management. In: Institute, F.-E.M. (ed.), vol. IS-700.A National Incident Management System, An Introduction, I-700.A (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nylén, L.: Operativ ledning: bedömande och beslutsfattande: lednings- och fältstaber vid särskild händelse: en handledning. Rikspolisstyrelsen. CRISMART, Försvarshögskolan, Stockholm (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Svensson, S.: Staber och stabsarbete vid kriser, risker och olyckor. Studentlitteratur, Lund (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Borglund, E., Landgren, J., Lintzen, M.: Lägesbilder: Att skapa och analysera lägesbilder vid samhällsstörning. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap, Stockholm (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap: Gemensamma grunder för samverkan och ledning vid samhällsstörningar. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap (MSB) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap: Aktörsgemensamma former för inriktning och samordning vid samhällsstörningar: Vägledning för aktörer på lokal och regional nivå med utgångspunkt i geografiskt områdesansvar. In: Enheten för samverkan och ledning (ed.) Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schmitdt, K.: Cooperative Work and Coordinative Practices: Contributions to the Conceptual Foundations of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Springer, London (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-068-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidt, K., Simonee, C.: Coordination mechanisms: towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work (CSCW) 5, 155–200 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmidt, K., Bannon, L.: Taking CSCW Seriously. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work 1, 7–40 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Maanen, J.: Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Puddephatt, A.J., Shaffir, W., Kleinknecht, S.W.: Ethnographies Revisited: Constructing Theory in the Field. Routledge, London; New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Button, G., Harper, R.: The relevance of ‘work-practice’ for design Comput. Supp. Coop. Work (CSCW) 4, 263–280 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R.: Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. Wiley, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kvale, S.: Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Studentlitteratur, Lund (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Blomberg, J., Karasti, H.: Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work (CSCW) 22, 373–423 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9183-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmidt, K., Bannon, L.: Constructing CSCW: the first quarter century. Supp. Coop. Work (CSCW) 22, 345–372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-013-9193-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dourish, P.: Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing for User eXperiences, pp. 2–16. ACM, Chicago (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dourish, P.: Implications for design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 541–550. ACM, Montreal (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Carrington, P.J., Schulenberg, J.L.: Structuring police discretion: the effect on referrals to youth court. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 19, 349–367 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fukuyama, F.: What is governance? Governance 26, 347–368 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Upward, F.: The records continuum and the concept of an end product. Arch. Manuscr. 32, 40–62 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Polismyndigheten: Polismyndighetens riktlinjer för operativ ledning vid särskilda händelser. In: Polisen (ed.) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  48. McKemmish, S.: Placing records continuum theory and practice. Arch. Sci. 1, 333–359 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Benson, D.: The police and information technology. In: Button, G. (ed.) Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology, pp. 81–97. Routledge, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pekkola, S.: Designed for unanticipated use: common artefacts as design principle for CSCW applications. In: GROUP 2003: Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Berlage, T., Sohlenkamp, M.: Visualizing common artefacts to support awareness in computer-mediated cooperation. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work 8, 207–238 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008608425504

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mid Sweden University, 85170, Sundsvall, Sweden

    Erik A. M. Borglund

Authors
  1. Erik A. M. Borglund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik A. M. Borglund .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

    Anneli Sundqvist

  2. OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

    Gerd Berget

  3. University of Boras, Boras, Sweden

    Jan Nolin

  4. OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

    Kjell Ivar Skjerdingstad

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Borglund, E.A.M. (2020). Records-Making During Crisis Management – Rule Based or Discretion Driven?. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43686-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43687-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation