Abstract
Participatory archive initiatives are an emerging phenomenon in the archives field. These initiatives are defined by the participation of the individuals that archival materials are created by or about. This often includes the description of materials by their creators. However, participatory archival description brings forth several questions: What knowledge and insights can be gained about items in a digital collection when they are described by their record creators and contributors? And what risks are there when the data values for are not created in a standardized format? To answer these questions, this paper examined the outcome of participatory archival description – i.e., free-text description metadata field created by participatory archives’ contributors. Using the Boston Harbor Islands Mass. Memories Collection Dublin Core-based description metadata records, contributor-created Description field length and attributes were analyzed through a combination of quantitative and qualitative content analysis methods. Study results show that data value of contributor-created description metadata was dominated by utterances that provide contextual information regarding archival objects, particularly about the individuals and physical environment that contributors associate with the items, while item content itself can be under-described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
References
Huvila, I.: The unbearable lightness of participating? Revisiting the discourses of “participation” in archival literature. J. Doc. 71(2), 358–386 (2015)
Shilton, K., Srinivasan, R.: Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections. Archivaria 63, 87–101 (2007)
Yakel, E.: Balancing archival authority with encouraging authentic voices to engage with records. In: Theimer, K. (ed.) A Different Kind of Web: New Connections Between Archives and Our Users, pp. 75–101. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2011)
Theimer, K.: Exploring the participatory archives. Presentation at the 2011 Society of American Archivists Annual Meeting (2011). http://www.slideshare.net/ktheimer/theimer-participatory-archives-saa2011
Caswell, M., Mallick, S.: Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Arch. Manuscripts 42(1), 73–86 (2014)
Eveleigh, A.: Welcoming the world: an exploration of participatory archives. In: International Council on Archives (ICA) Conference (ICA 2012), August 2012
Roeschley, A., Kim, J.: “Something that feels like a community”: the role of personal stories in building community-based participatory archives. Arch. Sci. 19(1), 27–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09302-2
Rolan, G.: Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping. Arch. Sci. 17(3), 195–225 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7
Wick, A.: We’re all vegans here: the twenty-first century archival ecosystem. J. Arch. Organ. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2018
Barber, S.T.: The ZOONIVERSE is expanding: crowdsourced solutions to the hidden collections problem and the rise of the revolutionary cataloging interface. J. Libr. Metadata 18(2), 85–111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2018.1489449
Chen, A.T., Carriere, R.M., Kaplan, S.J.: The user knows what to call it: incorporating patient voice through user-contributed tags on a participatory platform about health management. J. Med. Internet Res. 19(9), e292–e292 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7673
Varin, J.: iTunes metadata and classical music: issues and solutions for crowdsourced metadata in iTunes. Ser. Libr. 69(1), 70–76 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1036196
Liew, C.L.: Social metadata and public-contributed contents in memory institutions: “crowd voice” versus “authenticated heritage”? Preserv. Digit. Technol. Cult. 45(3), 122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2016-0017
Benoit, E.: MPLP part 2: replacing item-level metadata with user-generated social tags. Am. Archivist 81(1), 38–64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-81.1.38
Surles, E.: Sharing notes: a qualitative analysis of description of archival music materials. Music Ref. Serv. Q. 22(3), 111–130 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10588167.2019.1570739
Gracy, K.F., Lambert, F.: Who’s ready to surf the next wave? A study of perceived challenges to implementing new and revised standards for archival description. Am. Archivist 77(1), 96–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.77.1.b241071w5r252612
Baca, M., et al.: Cataloging Cultural Objects: A Guide to Describing Cultural Works and Their Images. American Library Association, Chicago (2006)
Baca, M., Harpring, P. (eds.): Categories for the Description of Works of Art (CDWA). Getty Research Institute, Santa Monica (2009)
National Union Catalog of Manuscript Collections: Online data sheet for participating institutions (2011). http://www.loc.gov/coll/nucmc/lcforms.html
OLAC Cataloging Policy Committee, Summary/Abstracts Task Force: Summary notes for catalog records (2002). http://www.olacinc.org/drupal/?q=node/21
Encoded Archival Description: EAD3 (2015). http://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/TagLibrary-VersionEAD3.pdf
Bearman, D.A.: Documenting documentation. Archivaria J. Assoc. Can. Archivists 34(Summer), 33–49 (1992)
Miller, P.: Collected wisdom: some cross-domain issues of collection level description. D-Lib Mag. 6(9) (2000)
Zavalina, O.L., Palmer, C.L., Jackson, A.S., Han, M.J.: Evaluating descriptive richness in collection-level metadata. J. Libr. Metadata 8(4), 263–292 (2009)
Northeastern University Libraries: Our Marathon (n.d.). https://marathon.library.northeastern.edu/
The Mass. Memories Road Show. The Mass. Memories Road Show project handbook: A planning guide for local communities. University of Massachusetts Boston, Joseph P. Healey Library, Boston (2016)
Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory: the discovery of grounded theory. Sociol. J. Br. Sociol. Assoc. 12(1), 27–49 (1967)
Tarver, H., Zavalina, O.L., Phillips, M.: An exploratory study of a Description field in the Digital Public Library of America. In: Proceedings of the International Conference and Workshop on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Copenhagen, Denmark, 13–16 October 2016 (2016)
Stewart, K.: Ordinary Affects. Duke University Press, Durham (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roeschley, A., Kim, J., Zavalina, O.L. (2020). An Exploration of Contributor-Created Description Field in Participatory Archives. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_54
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_54
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43686-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43687-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)