Skip to main content

Classification of Web Applications Using AiFlow Features

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications (WAINA 2020)

Abstract

With the increasing of complexity and volume of network traffic, more advanced methods of traffic analysis are required to continue producing useful results. Conventional methods of solving this problem include lexicographical pattern analysis, where a signature is created manually and then compared with incoming traffic in the hopes of detecting a matching signature. The main issue of such methods is its inability to adapt to even minor changes in the signature of the target application architecture. In this paper we introduce a new flow format AiFlow, designed specifically to assist in the association of traffic with application based on a wider set of criteria. This flow format coupled with a sufficient artificial intelligence (AI), could be capable of identifying both the dynamic and static elements that define the behavior of a network-enabled application. Further, the system would be equipped to adapt to the inevitable variations in application behavior over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moore, D., Keys, K., Koga, R., Lagache, E., Claffy, K.C.: CoralReef software suite as a tool for system and network administrators. In: Proceedings of the LISA 2001 15th Systems Administration Conference, San Diego, California, pp. 133–144 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Characterization of the traffic between SLAC and the internet. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/net/slacnetflow/html/SLAC-netflow.html

  3. IANA port numbers. http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers

  4. Gummadi, K.P., Dunn, R.J., Saroiu, S., Gribble, S.D., Levy, H.M., Zahorjan, J.: Measurement, modeling, and analysis of a peer-to-peer file sharing workload. In: ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, pp. 314–329 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sen, S., Wang, J.: Analyzing peer-to-peer traffic across large networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, Marseilles, France (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sen, S., Spatscheck, O., Wang, D.: Accurate, scalable in network identification of P2P traffic using application signatures. In: Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference, NY, USA, pp. 512–521 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ehlert, S., Petgang, S.: Analysis and signature of Skype VoIP session traffic, Franunhofer FOKUS Technical Report NGNISKYPE-06b, Berlin, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernaille, L., Teixeira, R.: Early recognition of encrypted applications. In: Proceedings of Passive and Active Measurement Conference (PAM 2007), Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium, pp. 165–175 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Park, C., Won, Y., Kim, M., Hong, J.: Towards automated application signature generation for traffic identification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS 2008), Salvador, Brazil, pp. 160–167 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dewes, C., Wichmann, A., Feldmann, A.: An analysis of internet chat systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pp. 51–64 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haffner, P., Sen, S., Spatscheck, O., Wang, D.M.: ACAS: automated construction of application signatures. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Mining Network Data, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 197–202 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karagiannis, T., Broido, A., Brownlee, N., Claffy, K.C., Faloutsos, M.: Is p2p dying or just hiding. Proc. IEEE Glob. Telecommun. Conf. 3, 1532–1538 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salgarelli, L., Gringoli, F., Karagiannis, T.: Comparing traffic classifiers. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 37(3), 65–68 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wireshark. https://www.wireshark.org/

  15. Paxson, V.: Empirically derived analytic models of wide-area TCP connections. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 2(4), 316–336 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paxson, V., Floyd, S.: Wide area traffic: the failure of Poisson modeling. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 3(3), 226–244 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported in part by funding from a Keene State College Faculty Development Grant and an undergraduate research grant from The School of Sciences, Sustainability and Health, Keene State College.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mercaldo, N., Lu, W. (2020). Classification of Web Applications Using AiFlow Features. In: Barolli, L., Amato, F., Moscato, F., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M. (eds) Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications. WAINA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1150. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics