Skip to main content

Shilling Attacks Detection in Collaborative Recommender System: Challenges and Promise

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1150))

Abstract

The reliability of the recommender system is highly essential for the continuity of any system. Fake and malicious users may be spoiling system predictions reliability by inserting and injecting fake profiles called “shilling attacks” into the target recommender system. Thus, the detection of these attacks is necessary for any recommender system. Therefore, several shilling attacks detection approaches have proposed. In this work, we propose a survey for the recent detection methods, which pick up famous shilling attack models against the collaborative filtering recommender systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jiang, L., Cheng, Y., Yang, L., Li, J., Yan, H., Wang, X.: A trust-based collaborative filtering algorithm for e-commerce recommendation system. J. Ambient. Intel. Hum. Comput. 10, 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang, L., Cheng, Y., Yang, L., et al.: A trust-based collaborative filtering algorithm for E-commerce recommendation system. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 10, 3023–3034 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunes, I., Kaleli, C., Bilge, A., Polat, H.: Shilling attacks against recommender systems: a comprehensive survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 42(4), 767–799 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dou, T., Yu, J., Xiong, Q., Gao, M., Song, Y., Fang, Q.: Collaborative shilling detection bridging factorization and user embedding. In: Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing. Guangzhou, China (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hao, Y., Zhang, P., Zhang, F.: Multiview ensemble method for detecting shilling attacks in collaborative recommender systems. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2018, 1–33 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8174603. Article ID 8174603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hao, Y., Zhang, F., Wang, J., Zhao, Q., Cao, J.: Detecting shilling attacks with automatic features from multiple views. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2019, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6523183. Article ID 6523183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Si, M., Li, Q.: Shilling attacks against collaborative recommender systems: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 53, 291–319 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9655-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhaumik, R., et al.: Securing collaborative filtering against malicious attacks through anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization (ITWP’06), vol. 6. Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mobasher, B.: Toward trustworthy recommender systems: an analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 7(4), 23-es (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alonso, S., et al.: Robust model-based reliability approach to tackle shilling attacks in collaborative filtering recommender systems. IEEE Access 7, 41782–41798 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke, R., et al.: Classification features for attack detection in collaborative recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mobasher, B., Burke, R., Bhaumik, R., Sandvig, J.J.: Attacks and remedies in collaborative recommendation. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(3), 56–63 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, K., et al.: Shilling attack based on item popularity and rated item correlation against collaborative filtering. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 10(7), 1833–1845 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Batmaz, Z., Yilmazel, B., Kaleli, C.: Shilling attack detection in binary data: a classification approach. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01321-2

  15. Gao, M., et al.: Detection of abnormal item based on time intervals for recommender systems. Sci. World J. 2014, 1–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/845897. Article ID 845897

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xia, H., Fang, B., Gao, M., Ma, H., Tang, Y., Wen, J.: A novel item anomaly detection approach against shilling attacks in collaborative recommendation systems using the dynamic time interval segmentation technique. Inf. Sci. 306, 150–165 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Batmaz, Z.: Shilling attack design and detection on masked binary data. MS thesis, Anadolu Üniversitesi (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, X., et al.: a novel kalman filter based shilling attack detection algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.06968 (2019)

  19. Karthikeyan, P., Selvi, S.T., Neeraja, G., Deepika, R., Vincent, A., Abinaya, V.: Prevention of shilling attack in recommender systems using discrete wavelet transform and support vector machine. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Computing (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shen, H., et al.: Discovering social spammers from multiple views. Neurocomputing 225, 49–57 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, W., et al.: Shilling attack detection for recommender systems based on credibility of group users and rating time series. PLoS ONE 13(5), e0196533 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forestier, G., Wemmert, C.: Semi-supervised learning using multiple clusterings with limited labeled data. Inf. Sci. 361, 48–65 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Mahony, M., et al.: Collaborative recommendation: A robustness analysis. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 4(4), 344–377 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kapoor, S., Kapoor, V., Kumar, R.: A review of attacks and its detection attributes on collaborative recommender systems. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. 8(7), 1188–1193 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mehta, B., Nejdl, W.: Unsupervised strategies for shilling detection and robust collaborative filtering. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 19(1–2), 65–97 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, M., Xu, C., et al.: Fast SVM trained by divide-and-conquer anchors. In: IJCAI’17 Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2322–2328 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou, W., et al.: Shilling attack detection for recommender systems based on credibility of group users and rating time series. PLoS ONE 13(5) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou, W., et al.: SVM-TIA a shilling attack detection method based on SVM and target item analysis in recommender systems. Neurocomputing 210, 197–205 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lamiaa F. Ibrahim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zayed, R.A., Ibrahim, L.F., Hefny, H.A., Salman, H.A. (2020). Shilling Attacks Detection in Collaborative Recommender System: Challenges and Promise. In: Barolli, L., Amato, F., Moscato, F., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M. (eds) Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications. WAINA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1150. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics