Skip to main content

Predicting Probability of Default Under IFRS 9 Through Data Mining Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1150))

Abstract

Data mining techniques were employed to automatise decision-making processes in several domains. In the banking context, the introduction of IFRS 9 on Financial Instruments has impacted not only on the area of accounting and financial reporting, but also on banks’ credit risk measurement and management processes, promoting effective and efficient data mining applications. In detail, banking management can benefit from these techniques by extracting knowledge from data to support more advanced models, in particular for the assessment of credits deriving from lending activity, in accordance with the Expected Loss Approach provided by the new standard. In this study, we exploit data mining techniques to measure the probability of default of credits with specific features at the reporting date. We consider supervised machine learning to build predictive models and association rules to infer a set of rules by a real-world data-set, reaching interesting results in terms of accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://sorry.vse.cz/~berka/challenge/.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R., et al.: Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, vol. 1215, pp. 487–499 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, D., Powell, R.: Credit risk measurement methodologies, Edith Cowan University, research online (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altman, E., Resti, A., Sironi, A.: Default recovery rates in credit risk modelling: a review of the literature and empirical evidence. Econ. Notes 33(2), 183–208 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Altman, E.I.: Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J. Finance 23(4), 589–609 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amato, F., Mazzeo, A., Moscato, V., Picariello, A.: Semantic management of multimedia documents for e-government activity, pp. 1193–1198 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2009.195

  6. Amato, F., Moscato, F., Moscato, V., Colace, F.: Improving security in cloud by formal modeling of iaas resources. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 87, 754–764 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amato, F., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., Piccialli, F.: SOS: a multimedia recommender system for online social networks. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 93, 914–923 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.04.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amato, F., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., Sperli, G.: Multimedia social network modeling: a proposal, pp. 448–453. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2016.20

  9. Angelini, E., di Tollo, G., Roli, A.: A neural network approach for credit risk evaluation. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 48(4), 733–755 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbuti, R., De Francesco, N., Santone, A., Vaglini, G.: Reduced models for efficient CCS verification. Form. Methods Syst. Des. 26(3), 319–350 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bay, S.D.: Multivariate discretization of continuous variables for set mining. In: Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, vol. 20, pp. 315–319 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. BCBS: Guidance on credit risk and accounting for expected credit losses. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d350.htm (2015)

  13. Brunese, L., Mercaldo, F., Reginelli, A., Santone, A.: An ensemble learning approach for brain cancer detection exploiting radiomic features. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 185, 105134 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruno, E., Iacoviello, G., Lazzini, A.: On the possible tools for the prevention of non-performing loans, a case study of an Italian bank. Corp. Ownersh. Control 5(1), 7–19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bushman, R.M., Williams, C.D.: Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning, and discipline of banks’ risk-taking. J. Account. Econ. 54(1), 1–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Canfora, G., Martinelli, F., Mercaldo, F., Nardone, V., Santone, A., Visaggio, C.A.: LEILA: formal tool for identifying mobile malicious behaviour. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 45, 1230–1252 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ceccarelli, M., Cerulo, L., Santone, A.: De novo reconstruction of gene regulatory networks from time series data, an approach based on formal methods. Methods 69(3), 298–305 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chitra, K., Subashini, B.: Data mining techniques and its applications in banking sector. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 3(8), 219–226 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. EBA: Eba/gi/2017/06, guidelines on credit institutions’ credit risk management practices and accounting (or expected credit losses) (2017). https://www.eba.europa.eu/-/eba-publishes-final-guidelines-on-credit-institutions-credit-risk-managementpractices-and

  20. Francesco, N.D., Lettieri, G., Santone, A., Vaglini, G.: GreASE: a tool for efficient “nonequivalence” checking. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 23(3), 24 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frawley, W.J., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Matheus, C.J.: Knowledge discovery in databases: an overview. AI Mag. 13(3), 57–70 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. FSB: Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services (2017). http://www.fsb.org/2017/11/artificialintelligence-and-machine-learning-in-financialservice

  23. FSF: Report of the financial stability forum on addressing procyclicality in the financial system (2009). https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/r_0904a.pdf

  24. Giovannoni, E., Quarchioni, S., Riccaboni, A.: The role of roles in risk management change: the case of an Italian bank. Eur. Acc. Rev. 25(1), 109–129 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gradara, S., Santone, A., Villani, M.L.: Using heuristic search for finding deadlocks in concurrent systems. Inf. Comput. 202(2), 191–226 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. IASB: IFRS 9: Financial instruments (2014). https://www.iasplus.com/en-usfstandards/internationalfifrs-en-us/lfrs9

  27. Laghi, E., Di Marcantonio, M., D’Amico, E.: Estimating credit default swap spreads using accounting data, market quotes and credit ratings: the European banks case. Financ. Report. 2014(2–3–4), 59–81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, I., Shin, Y.J.: Fintech: ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Bus. Horiz. 61(1), 35–46 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Seow, H.V., Thomas, L.C.: Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: an update of research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 247(1), 124–136 (2015)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Mackinnon, M.J., Glick, N.: Applications: data mining and knowledge discovery in databases-an overview. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 41(3), 255–275 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Marton, J., Runesson, E.: The predictive ability of loan loss provisions in banks-effects of accounting standards, enforcement and incentives. Br. Acc. Rev. 49(2), 162–180 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mercaldo, F., Canfora, G., Visaggio, C.A.: Identification of anomalies in processes of database alteration. In: 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation, pp. 513–514. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mercaldo, F., Nardone, V., Santone, A.: Diabetes mellitus affected patients classification and diagnosis through machine learning techniques. Procedia Comput. Sci. 112, 2519–2528 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine learning and data mining. Commun. ACM 42(11), 30–36 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Novotny-Farkas, Z.: The interaction of the IFRS 9 expected loss approach with supervisory rules and implications for financial stability. Acc. Europe 13(2), 197–227 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Onay, C., Öztürk, E.: A review of credit scoring research in the age of big data. J. Financ. Regul. Complian. 26(3), 382–405 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Poddighe, F., Madonna, S.: (a cura di) I modelli di previsione delle crisi aziendali: possibilità e limiti, vol. 72. Giuffrè Editore, Torino (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Santone, A.: Automatic verification of concurrent systems using a formula-based compositional approach. Acta Informatica 38(8), 531–564 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Santone, A.: Clone detection through process algebras and Java Bytecode. In: IWSC, pp. 73–74. Citeseer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Saunders, A., Allen, L.: Credit Risk Management In and Out of the Financial Crisis: New Approaches to Value at Risk and Other Paradigms, vol. 528. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by MIUR - SecureOpenNets and EU SPARTA and CyberSANE projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Mercaldo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martinelli, F., Mercaldo, F., Raucci, D., Santone, A. (2020). Predicting Probability of Default Under IFRS 9 Through Data Mining Techniques. In: Barolli, L., Amato, F., Moscato, F., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M. (eds) Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications. WAINA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1150. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_87

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics