Skip to main content

Innovation Workshop Documentation for Following Software Engineering Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12045))

  • 1529 Accesses

Abstract

[Context & motivation] Requirements engineering (RE) can be seen as creative problem solving (CPS), overlapping with user experience (UX) and design activities. Creative processes, such as innovation workshops (IWs), are often facilitated group activities. They provide an understanding of challenges and user needs, leading to increased software quality. A large number of results from IWs needs to be documented in a suitable manner for later use, as not all results can be followed up upon immediately. [Question/problem] With current means of IW documentation, it is hard to extract the required information (e.g., photo minutes), or they are inefficient to produce or digest (e.g., audio and video recordings, textual documentation). Documentation of only the results leads to the loss of any discussions, decisions, reasons, and discarded alternatives, as these are usually not written down during an IW. The interpretation of the documentation depends on the viewer’s memory and understanding of the IW and the results, which is prone to misinterpretation and errors unless enriched with context information from the IW planning. [Principal ideas/results] We explored the limitations of IW documentation during a workshop with 29 experts from the usability and UX domain. Problems with using the results in later software engineering (SE), RE, and UX activities arise from misalignment between IW result documentation and activity requirements. The experts created a set of initial solution ideas, but no concrete solutions. [Contributions] We address the need for reasonable methods for documenting the results of IWs so that they can be used efficiently in later activities. The design and preliminary results of the expert workshop are presented. Furthermore, we discuss a research roadmap towards making targeted improvements to IW documentation by understanding subsequent activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adam, S., Trapp, M.: Success factors for creativity workshops in RE. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1342, pp. 54–61 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrios, P.C., Monticolo, D., Sidhom, S., Gabriel, A.: An organizational model to understand the creativity workshop. In: 2017 13th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology Internet-Based System, pp. 496–502. IEEE, December 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2017.87. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8334793/

  3. Brem, A., Spoedt, H.: Same same but different: perspectives on creativity workshops by design and business. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 45(1), 27–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2017.2667143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerkow, D., Adam, S., Riegel, N., Ünalan, Ö.: A creativity method for business information systems. In: 16th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, Proceedings of the Workshop CreaRE, PLREQ, RePriCo RESC, pp. 8–20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haigh, T.: Hey Google, what’s a moonshot? How Silicon Valley mocks Apollo. Commun. ACM 62(1), 24–30 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Inayat, I., Salim, S.S., Marczak, S., Daneva, M., Shamshirband, S.: A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 915–929 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karras, O.: Software professionals’ attitudes towards video as a medium in requirements engineering. In: Kuhrmann, M., et al. (eds.) PROFES 2018. LNCS, vol. 11271, pp. 150–158. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03673-7_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Karras, O., Kiesling, S., Schneider, K.: Supporting requirements elicitation by tool-supported video analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2016, pp. 146–155 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2016.10

  9. Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., Kowitz, B.: Sprint: how to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days. Simon and Schuster (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maiden, N., Jones, S., Karlsen, K., Neill, R., Zachos, K., Milne, A.: Requirements engineering as creative problem solving: a research agenda for idea finding. In: Proceedings of the 2010 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2010, pp. 57–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2010.16

  11. Maiden, N., Manning, S., Robertson, S., Greenwood, J.: Integrating creativity workshops into structured requirements processes. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS 2004, p. 113. ACM Press, New York (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013132. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1013115.1013132

  12. Maiden, N., Ncube, C., Robertson, S.: Can Requirements Be Creative? Experiences with an Enhanced Air Space Management System Centre for HCI Design, City University, London, UK Atlantic Systems Guild, London, UK Abstract (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mennig, P., Trapp, M.: Designing flexible creative spaces. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2376 (2019). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2376/CreaRE_paper2.pdf

  14. Plain, C.: Build an affinity for KJ method. Qual. Prog. 40(3), 88 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Parts of this work have been funded by the “EnStadt: Pfaff” project (grants no. 03SBE112D and 03SBE112G) of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Mennig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mennig, P., Nass, C. (2020). Innovation Workshop Documentation for Following Software Engineering Activities. In: Madhavji, N., Pasquale, L., Ferrari, A., Gnesi, S. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12045. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44428-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44429-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics