Abstract
One of the focuses of interest for conflict research is crisis forecasting. While the approach often favored by the media and public approaches this challenge qualitatively with the help of pundits illustrating effects in a narrative form, quantitative models based on empirical data have been shown to be able to also provide valuable insights into multidimensional observations.
For these quantitative models, Bayes networks perform well on this kind of data. Both approaches arguably fail to meaningfully include all relevant aspects as
-
expert knowledge is difficult to formalize over a complex multidimensional space and often limited to few variables (e.g. more A will lead to less B)
-
empirical data can only tell us about things that are easily measurable and can only show correlations (in contrast to causalities that would be important for forecasting)
In this paper we will develop a method for combining empirical time series data with expert knowledge about causalities and “hidden variables” (nodes that belong to variables that are not directly observable), thereby bridging the gap between model design and fitting.
We build a toolset to use operationalized knowledge to build and extend a Bayes network for conflict prediction and, model unobservable probability distributions. Based on expert input from political scientists and military analysts and empirical data from the UN, Worldbank and other openly available and established sources we use our toolset to build an early-warning-system combining data and expert beliefs and evaluate its predictive performance against recordings of past conflicts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We have experimented with various syntaxes for various purposes; this is one designed for interfacing to a graphical front end. We can easily change this as appropriate.
- 2.
In an experimental extension!
References
Borghoff, U.M., Dietrich, J.-H.: Intelligence and security studies. In: Bode, A., Broy, M., Bungartz, H.-J., Matthes, F. (eds.) 50 Jahre Universitäts-Informatik in München, pp. 113–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54712-0_9
Chadefaux, T.: Conflict forecasting and its limits. Data Sci. 1, 7–17 (2017)
Corvaja, A.S., Jeraj, B., Borghoff, U.M.: The rise of intelligence studies: a model for Germany? Connect. Q. J. 15(1), 79–106 (2016). https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.15.1.06
Huang, L., Cai, G., Yuan, H., Chen, J.: A hybrid approach for identifying the structure of a Bayesian network model. Expert Syst. Appl. 131, 308–320 (2019)
Johansen, I.: Scenario modelling with morphological analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 126, 116–125 (2018)
Kim, H.: Patterns of economic development in the world. J. Glob. Econ. 2(113), 1–8 (2014)
Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)
Mahoney, S., Comstock, E., de Blois, B., Darcy, S.: Aggregating forecasts using a learned Bayesian network. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pp. 626–631 (2011)
Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)
Raleigh, C., Linke, A., Hegre, H., Karlsen, J.: Introducing ACLED-armed conflict location and event data. J. Peace Res. 47(5), 651–660 (2010)
Salmeron, A., Rumi, R., Langseth, H., Madsen, A.L., Nielsen, T.D.: A review of inference algorithms for hybrid Bayesian networks. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 62, 799–828 (2018)
Tetlock, P.E.: Expert Political Judgment. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)
Tetlock, P.E., Gardner, D.: Superforecasting. The Art and Science of Prediction. Random House, New York (2016)
Acknowledgement
We thank the anonymous reviewers for greatly improving the paper. Likewise, we thank Jonas Andrulis and Samuel Weinbach for influential discussions on the topic and their contributions to an earlier version of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Borghoff, U.M., Matthews, S., Prüßing, H., Schäfer, C.T., Stuke, O. (2020). A Latent Variable Model in Conflict Research. In: Moreno-Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada-Arencibia, A. (eds) Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2019. EUROCAST 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12013. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45093-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45093-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45092-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45093-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)