Skip to main content

An Analysis of UX Based on Users’ Emotional Intention and Values, Both Expressed Through Twitter Posts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1081))

Abstract

Texts written by users are often used in investigations of their experiences using a system. When users write about texts based on their own decisions, the texts are a rich context for User eXperience (UX) evaluation of such systems due to the users’ spontaneity. Usually, UX goals are evaluated in users’ texts, including their perception about the usability of the system. An UX analysis from the perspective of the user’s emotional intent and the expression of their personal or social values in the posts has not yet been performed. In this chapter, we analyzed the UX reported on users’ Twitter posts relating to these two perspectives. We identified significant correlations calculated from posts that express a particular level of emotional intention of the user and a certain social or personal value. All levels of emotion had a significant relationship with at least 2 of the 12 values analyzed. Results showed that these relationships from texts written by users are useful to analyze the UX of the posts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baker, L.R.: Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Baranauskas, C., Souza, C., Pereira, R.: GranDIHC-BR, pp. 27–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baremblitt, G.F.: Progressos e retrocessos em psiquiatria e psicanálise. Global, Rio de Janeiro (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bargas-Avila, J., Hornbæk, K.: Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In: CHI 2011, pp. 2689–2698. The ACM Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maia, C.L.B., Furtado, E.S.: An approach to analyze user’s emotion in HCI experiments using psychophysiological measures. IEEE Access 7, 36471–36480 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardoso, C.: A cidade-estado antiga. Ática, São Paulo (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cristescu, I.: Emotions in human-computer interaction: the role of non-verbal behavior in interactive systems. Revista Informatica Economica 2, 110–116 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desmet, O.: Measuring emotion: development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In: Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 3, pp. 111–123. Springer, Dordrecht (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Donath, J.: Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: Kollock, P., Smith, M. (eds.) Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dron, J.: Designing the undesignable: social software and control. Educ. Technol. Soc. 10(3), 60–71 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ekman, P.: An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6, 169–200 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Faden, R., Beauchamp, T.: A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford University Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frankena, W.: Value and valuation. In: Edwards, P. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7–8, pp. 409–410. Macmillan, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman B., Peter, H., Kahn J., Boring, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, pp. 348–372 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman, B.: Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3, 16–23 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., Görtz, A.: Needs, affect, and interactive products. J. Interact. Comput. 22(5), 353–362 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience -a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hedegaard, S., Simonsen, J.: Extracting usability and user experience information from online user reviews. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013), pp. 2089–2098 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hogg, M., Abrams, D.: Social Identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. Routledge, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holanda, A.B.: Dicionário Aurélio da Língua Portuguesa, 5° edição (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hornbæk, K., Hertzum, M.: Technology acceptance and user experience: a review of the experiential component in HCI. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 24(5) (2017). Article no. 33

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnston, C.: What is Social Value? A Discussion Paper. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ketola, P., Roto, V.: Exploring user experience measurement needs. In: 5th COST294-MAUSE Open Workshop on Valid Useful User Experience Measurement (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kleinberg J.: Challenges in mining social network data: processes, privacy and paradoxes. In: Em KDD/USA, pp. 4–5 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Korhgen, H., Arrasvuori, J., Väänänen, V.: Let users tell the story. In Proceedings of AMC CHI 2010 Extended Abstracts, Atlanta, pp. 4051–4056. The ACM Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mendes, M.S., Furtado, E., Furtado, V., de Castro, M.F.: How do users express their emotions regarding the social system in use? A classification of their postings by using the emotional analysis of norman. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) SCSM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8531, pp. 229–241. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07632-4_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Mendes, M.: MALTU - Um modelo para avaliação da interação em sistemas sociais a partir da linguagem textual do usuário. Tese (doutorado). Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Computação, Fortaleza (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mendes, M., Furtado, E.S.: UUX-Posts: a tool for extracting and classifying postings related to the use of a system. In: Proceedings of the 8th Latin American Conference on HCI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moser, C., Fuchsberger, V., Tscheligi, M.: A value-based UX evaluation. In: CHI 2012, pp. 5–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Norman, D.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Oliveira, D.C., Furtado, E.S., Mendes, M.S.: Uma Investigação da Relação entre Valores Humanos e a Intenção Emocional do Usuário em suas postagens no Twitter. In: WAIHCWS, 8 2017, 1. Anais do VIII Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador para a Web Social, Porto Alegre, pp. 58–69, December 2017. ISSN 2596-0296

    Google Scholar 

  32. Oliveira, D.C.: MASSVA: Modelo de Avaliação de Sistemas Sociais sob a ótica dos Valores humanos a partir das postagens dos usuários. Tese doutorado. Unifor (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Olsson, T., Salo, M.: Narratives of satisfying and unsatisfying experiences of current mobile augmented reality applications. In: Proceedings of AMC CHI 2012 Extended Abstracts, pp. 2779–2788 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ortony, A., Norman, D., Revelle, W.: Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In: Fellous, J.M., Arbib, M.A. (eds.) Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot, pp. 173–202. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Partala, T., Kallinen, A.: Understanding the most satisfying and unsatisfying user experiences: emotions, psychological needs, and context. Interact. Comput. 24, 25–34 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pereira, R., Baranauskas, C.: Softwares sociais: uma visão orientada a valores. In: IHC, pp. 149–158 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pereira, R., de Miranda, L.C., Baranauskas, C., Piccolo, L.S.G., Almeida, L.D.A., Dos Reis, J.C.: Interaction design of social software: clarifying requirements through a culturally aware artifact. In: Information Society (i-Society), pp. 293–298 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Preece, J., Rogers, Y.: Design de interação: além da interação homem-computador. Bookman (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Riediger, M.: Experience Sampling. RatSWD Working Paper, no. 62. http://library.mpibberlin.mpg.de/ft/mr/MR_Experience_2009.pdf

  40. Rokeach, M.: The Nature of Human Values. Free Press, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Roto, V., Rantavuo, H., Vaananen-Vainio-Mattila, K.: Evaluating user experience of early product concepts. In: International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, pp. 199–208 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Santos, R.M., de Oliveira, K.M., Andrade, R.M.C., Santos, I.S., Lima, E.R.: A quality model for human-computer interaction evaluation in ubiquitous systems. In: Collazos, C., Liborio, A., Rusu, C. (eds.) CLIHC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8278, pp. 63–70. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03068-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Schachter, S., Singer, J.E.: Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychol. Rev. 69, 379–399 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schoeman, F.: Privacy and Social Freedom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Schwartz, S.H.: Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J. Soc. Issues 50(4), 19–45 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J., Lee, F.: Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy 35, 994–1017 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research 1978. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tuch, A., Trusell, R., Hornbæk, K.: Analyzing users’ narratives to understand experience with interactive products. In: Proceedings of AMC CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts, pp. 2079–2088. The ACM Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xavier, R.: Uma abordagem híbrida para a avaliação da experiência emocional de usuários. 161 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência da Computação), São Carlos-SP, Brasil (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ying, Y., Ziran Z.: Contemporary social design principles in HCI design. In: Control, Automation and Systems Engineering (CASE), pp. 1–4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth S. Furtado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Furtado, E.S., Mendes, M.S., Oliveira, D.C., Lima, L. (2020). An Analysis of UX Based on Users’ Emotional Intention and Values, Both Expressed Through Twitter Posts. In: Santos, R., Maciel, C., Viterbo, J. (eds) Software Ecosystems, Sustainability and Human Values in the Social Web. WAIHCWS WAIHCWS 2017 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1081. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46130-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46130-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46129-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46130-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics