Skip to main content

A Baseline for Predicting Glioblastoma Patient Survival Time with Classical Statistical Models and Primitive Features Ignoring Image Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries (BrainLes 2019)

Abstract

Gliomas are the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumors in adults. Until now an accurate and reliable method to predict patient survival time based on medical imaging and meta-information has not been developed [3]. Therefore, the survival time prediction task was introduced to the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) to facilitate research in survival time prediction.

Here we present our submissions to the BraTS survival challenge based on classical statistical models to which we feed the provided metadata as features. We intentionally ignore the available image information to explore how patient survival can be predicted purely by metadata. We achieve our best accuracy on the validation set using a simple median regression model taking only patient age into account. We suggest using our model as a baseline to benchmark the added predictive value of sophisticated features for survival time prediction.

B. Wiestler and B.H. Menze—Contributed equally as senior authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bakas, S., et al.: Segmentation labels and radiomic features for the pre-operative scans of the TCGA-GBM collection. Cancer Imaging Arch. 286 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bakas, S., et al.: Advancing the Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Sci. Data 4, 170117 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakas, S., et al.: Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02629 (2018)

  4. Christakis, N.A., Smith, J.L., Parkes, C.M., Lamont, E.B.: Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort studycommentary: why do doctors overestimate? commentary: prognoses should be based on proved indices not intuition. BMJ 320(7233), 469–473 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Everitt, B.: Book reviews: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ eds 1992: Statistical models in S. California: Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole. ISBN 0 534 16765-9. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1(2), 220–221 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029200100208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glare, P., et al.: A systematic review of physicians’ survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ 327(7408), 195 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Han, C., et al.: GAN-based synthetic brain MR image generation. In: 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), pp. 734–738. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henderson, R., Keiding, N.: Individual survival time prediction using statistical models. J. Med. Ethics 31(12), 703–706 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.012427, https://jme.bmj.com/content/31/12/703

  9. Kennedy, W.J., Gentle, J.E.: Statistical Computing. Routledge, Abingdon (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, D.W., Lee, S., Kwon, S., Nam, W., Cha, I.H., Kim, H.J.: Deep learning-based survival prediction of oral cancer patients. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 6994 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koenker, R., Bassett Jr, G.: Regression quantiles. Econ.: J. Econ. Soc. 46, 33–50 (1978). https://www.jstor.org/stable/1913643?seq=1

  12. Koenker, R., Machado, J.A.F.: Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94(448), 1296–1310 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10473882

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lao, J., et al.: A deep learning-based radiomics model for prediction of survival in glioblastoma multiforme. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 10353 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, H., et al.: DiamondGAN: unified multi-modal generative adversarial networks for MRI sequences synthesis. In: Shen, D., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2019. LNCS, vol. 11767, pp. 795–803. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32251-9_87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Menze, B.H., et al.: The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34(10), 1993–2024 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohgaki, H., Kleihues, P.: Population-based studies on incidence, survival rates, and genetic alterations in astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 64(6), 479–489 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parkes, C.M.: Commentary: prognoses should be based on proved indices not intuition. Br. Med. J. 320, 473–473 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinhauser, K.E., Clipp, E.C., McNeilly, M., Christakis, N.A., McIntyre, L.M., Tulsky, J.A.: In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann. Intern. Med. 132(10), 825–832 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weninger, L., Haarburger, C., Merhof, D.: Robustness of radiomics for survival prediction of brain tumor patients depending on resection status. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 13, 73 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weninger, L., Rippel, O., Koppers, S., Merhof, D.: Segmentation of brain tumors and patient survival prediction: methods for the BraTS 2018 challenge. In: Crimi, A., Bakas, S., Kuijf, H., Keyvan, F., Reyes, M., van Walsum, T. (eds.) BrainLes 2018. LNCS, vol. 11384, pp. 3–12. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11726-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, K., Nath, S., Koziarz, A., Badhiwala, J.H., Ghayur, H., Sourour, M., Catana, D., Nassiri, F., Alotaibi, M.B., Kameda-Smith, M., et al.: Biopsy versus subtotal versus gross total resection in patients with low-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 120, e762–e775 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Youngner, S.J., Arnold, R.M.: The Oxford Handbook of Ethics at the End of Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Bjoern Menze, Benedikt Wiestler and Florian Kofler are supported through the SFB 824, subproject B12.

Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through TUM International Graduate School of Science and Engineering (IGSSE), GSC 81.

With the support of the Technical University of Munich – Institute for Advanced Study, funded by the German Excellence Initiative.

Johannes C. Paetzold is supported by the Graduate School of Bioengineering, Technical University of Munich.

Daniel Krahulec is supported by MR R&D Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Florian Kofler or Johannes C. Paetzold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kofler, F. et al. (2020). A Baseline for Predicting Glioblastoma Patient Survival Time with Classical Statistical Models and Primitive Features Ignoring Image Information. In: Crimi, A., Bakas, S. (eds) Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries. BrainLes 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11992. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46640-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46640-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46639-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46640-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics