Abstract
In order to provide evaluation methods for the interface by AI design at the user experience side. First, this paper analyzes the human-computer interaction model, the display characteristics of the interface, and summarizes the influence factors of the interface on the user experience. Then studied the existing methods of building evaluation system. After that, using rough set theory and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, the evaluation index system of user experience based interface design is established. According to the evaluation system, we can provide a meaningful optimization strategy for improving the user experience of the interface, in order to provide a better experience for the user in the process of using the AI design interface.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Vocke, C., Constantinescu, C., Popescu, D.: Application potentials of artificial intelligence for the design of innovation processes. Procedia CIRP 84, 810–813 (2019)
Adobe Sensei Homepage. Https://www.adobe.com/cn/sensei.html. Accessed 02 Jan 2020
PRISMA Homepage. Http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Accessed 02 Jan 2020
Wix Homepage. https://www.wix.com/release/notes/wix-adi. Accessed 02 Jan 2020
China Internet Network Information Center Homepage. Http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-08/30/c_.htm. Accessed 02 Jan 2020
Yu, N., Kong, J.: User experience with web browsing on small screens: experimental investigations of mobile-page interface design and homepage design for news websites. Inf. Sci. 330(10), 427–443 (2016)
Amershi, S.: Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In: 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, vol. 5, no. 2 (2019)
Thacker, P., Tullis, T.S., Babu, A.J.G.: Application of Tullis visual search model to highlighted and non-highlighted tabular displays. In: Human Factors Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction: Selections from Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetings, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 115–119 (1995)
Streveler, D.J., Wasserman, A.I.: Quantitative measures of the spatial properties of screen designs. In: INTERACT Conference Proceedings, North Holland, Amsterdam (1984)
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognit. Sci. 12(2), 257–285 (1988)
Van Gerven, P.W.M., Paas, F.G.W.C., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Schmidt, H.G.: Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency. Learn. Instr. 12(1), 87–105 (2002)
Chen, Z., et al.: Assessing affective experience of in-situ environmental walk via wearable biosensors for evidence-based design. Cognit. Syst. Res. 52, 970–977 (2018)
Bonnes, M., Carrus, G.: Environmental Psychology, Overview. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Bio Behavioral Psychology (2017)
Zhang, Q., Xie, Q., Wang, G.: A survey on rough set theory and its applications. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 1(4), 323–333 (2016)
Diker, M.: Textures and fuzzy unit operations in rough set theory: an approach to fuzzy rough set models. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 336(1), 27–53 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, Q., Wang, H. (2020). Research on Evaluation Index System of Artificial Intelligence Design Based on User Experience. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12181. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49059-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49059-1_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49058-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49059-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)