Skip to main content

Good Boy Here or Bad Boy Far Away?

Effects of Digital Nudging on Booking Decisions in Car Sharing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12187))

Abstract

The use of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and car-sharing is one way to reduce local and (potentially) global transport emissions. In order to increase the use of electric vehicles in car-sharing, this work attempts to examine the effect of framing on car selection within the booking process users encounter in car-sharing. An online questionnaire (N = 83) with five different framing conditions (positive and negative goal framing, local or global focus of consequences) was used. For each of the different conditions, the individual, subjective utility of the BEV compared to a combustion vehicle was determined in a total of 80 trials. For this purpose, the participants were asked to make decisions either for the combustion engine vehicle (CV) or the BEV, whereby the prices and their relationship to each other were systematically varied. This study is based on behavioral economic paradigms. Ecological awareness was also assessed. It became clear that positive goal framing has an influence on decisions favoring BEVs in car-sharing. No significant effects could be found regarding the local vs global framing. The results show a main effect of the framing condition as well as for the ecological awareness. However, the interaction between framing (all conditions) and ecological awareness was not significant. The study also showed that the positive framing condition led to a higher subjective utility of the electric vehicle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. 59, 251–278 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfister, H.R., Jungermann, H., Fischer, K.: Entscheiden unter Unsicherheit. In: Die Psychologie der Entscheidung, pp. 169–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53038-2_6

  3. Stocke, V.: Framing und Rationalität: Die Bedeutung der Informationsdarstellung für das Entscheidungsverhalten. De Gruyter (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scheufele, B.: Framing-Effekte auf dem Prüfstand. Eine theoretische, methodische und empirische Auseinandersetzung mit der Wirkungsperspektive des Framing-Ansatzes. Medien Kommun. 52, 30–55 (2004). https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2004-1-30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L., Gaeth, G.J.: All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 76, 149–188 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., Blair, E.: Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 85, 382–399 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kagerbauer, M., Heilig, M., Mallig, N., Vortisch, P.: Carsharing - ein neues Verkehrssystem! In: Proff, H., Fojcik, T.M. (eds.) Nationale und internationale Trends in der Mobilität: Technische und betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte, pp. 385–402. Springer, Wiesbaden (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14563-7_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Riegler, S., et al.: CarSharing 2025 – Nische oder Mainstream? 66 (2025

    Google Scholar 

  9. Genikomsakis, K.N., Angulo Gutierrez, I., Thomas, D., Ioakimidis, C.S.: Simulation and design of fast charging infrastructure for a university-based e-carsharing system. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19, 2923–2932 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2767779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wappelhorst, S., Sauer, M., Hinkeldein, D., Bocherding, A., Glaß, T.: Potential of electric carsharing in urban and rural areas. Transp. Res. Procedia. 4, 374–386 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scherf, C., Steiner, J., Wolter, F.: E-Carsharing: Erfahrungen, Nutzerakzeptanz und Kundenwünsche. Int. Verkehrswesen. 65, 42–44 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ölander, F., Thøgersen, J.: Informing versus nudging in environmental policy. J. Consum. Policy. 37, 341–356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9256-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bazerman, M.H.: The relevance of Kahneman and Tversky’s concept of framing to organizational behavior. J. Manag. 10, 333–343 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638401000307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruth, J.A., York, A.: Framing information to enhance corporate reputation. J. Bus. Res. 57, 14–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00270-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barkan, R., Busemeyer, J.R.: Modeling dynamic inconsistency with a changing reference point. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 16, 235–255 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chong, D., Druckman, J.N.: Framing Theory. Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10, 103–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Piñon, A., Gambara, H.: A meta-analytic review of framing effect: risky, attribute and goal framing 7 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chandran, S., Menon, G.: When a day means more than a year: effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. J. Consum. Res. 31, 375–389 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1086/422116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scannell, L., Gifford, R.: Personally relevant climate change: the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environ. Behav. 45(1), 60–85 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, A.Y., Aaker, J.L.: Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 205–218 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Avineri, E., Waygood, E.O.D.: Applying valence framing to enhance the effect of information on transport-related carbon dioxide emissions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 48, 31–38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, J.J.: The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism Mass Commun. Q. 72(2), 285–299 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leiserowitz, A.: Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In: Moser, S.C., Dilling, L. (eds.) Creating a Climate for Change, pp. 44–63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871.005

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Updegraff, J.A., Brick, C., Emanuel, A.S., Mintzer, R.E., Sherman, D.K.: Message framing for health: Moderation by perceived susceptibility and motivational orientation in a diverse sample of Americans. Health Psychol. 34, 20–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, N.-Y.: The influence of message framing and issue involvement on promoting abandoned animals adoption behaviors. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 82, 338–341 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C., Slothuus, R.: Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Commun. Res. 36, 400–425 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schlüter, J., Weyer, J.: Car sharing as a means to raise acceptance of electric vehicles: an empirical study on regime change in automobility. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 60, 185–201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luhmann, C.C., Chun, M.M., Yi, D.-J., Lee, D., Wang, X.-J.: Neural dissociation of delay and uncertainty in intertemporal choice. J. Neurosci. 28, 14459–14466 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5058-08.2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, C.L., Hantula, D.A.: Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: a comparison of tasks and modes. Behav. Res. Methods. 40, 940–953 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Graham-Rowe, E., et al.: Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: a qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 46, 140–153 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Glass, G.V., Peckham, P.D., Sanders, J.R.: Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Rev. Educ. Res. 42, 237–288 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543042003237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Greenhouse, S.W., Geisser, S.: On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24, 95–112 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289823

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Maheswaran, D., Meyers-Levy, J.: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. J. Mark. Res. 27, 361–367 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Updegraff, J.A., Rothman, A.J.: Health message framing: moderators, mediators, and mysteries: health message framing. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass. 7, 668–679 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chorus, C.G., Molin, E.J.: Travel information as an instrument to change car- drivers’ travel choices: a literature review. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 31 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Schrills .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schrills, T., Zoubir, M., Stahl, J., Drozniak, K., Franke, T. (2020). Good Boy Here or Bad Boy Far Away?. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Cognition and Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49182-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49183-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics