Abstract
The use of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and car-sharing is one way to reduce local and (potentially) global transport emissions. In order to increase the use of electric vehicles in car-sharing, this work attempts to examine the effect of framing on car selection within the booking process users encounter in car-sharing. An online questionnaire (N = 83) with five different framing conditions (positive and negative goal framing, local or global focus of consequences) was used. For each of the different conditions, the individual, subjective utility of the BEV compared to a combustion vehicle was determined in a total of 80 trials. For this purpose, the participants were asked to make decisions either for the combustion engine vehicle (CV) or the BEV, whereby the prices and their relationship to each other were systematically varied. This study is based on behavioral economic paradigms. Ecological awareness was also assessed. It became clear that positive goal framing has an influence on decisions favoring BEVs in car-sharing. No significant effects could be found regarding the local vs global framing. The results show a main effect of the framing condition as well as for the ecological awareness. However, the interaction between framing (all conditions) and ecological awareness was not significant. The study also showed that the positive framing condition led to a higher subjective utility of the electric vehicle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. 59, 251–278 (1986)
Pfister, H.R., Jungermann, H., Fischer, K.: Entscheiden unter Unsicherheit. In: Die Psychologie der Entscheidung, pp. 169–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53038-2_6
Stocke, V.: Framing und Rationalität: Die Bedeutung der Informationsdarstellung für das Entscheidungsverhalten. De Gruyter (2014)
Scheufele, B.: Framing-Effekte auf dem Prüfstand. Eine theoretische, methodische und empirische Auseinandersetzung mit der Wirkungsperspektive des Framing-Ansatzes. Medien Kommun. 52, 30–55 (2004). https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2004-1-30
Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L., Gaeth, G.J.: All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 76, 149–188 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., Blair, E.: Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 85, 382–399 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2962
Kagerbauer, M., Heilig, M., Mallig, N., Vortisch, P.: Carsharing - ein neues Verkehrssystem! In: Proff, H., Fojcik, T.M. (eds.) Nationale und internationale Trends in der Mobilität: Technische und betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte, pp. 385–402. Springer, Wiesbaden (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14563-7_24
Riegler, S., et al.: CarSharing 2025 – Nische oder Mainstream? 66 (2025
Genikomsakis, K.N., Angulo Gutierrez, I., Thomas, D., Ioakimidis, C.S.: Simulation and design of fast charging infrastructure for a university-based e-carsharing system. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19, 2923–2932 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2767779
Wappelhorst, S., Sauer, M., Hinkeldein, D., Bocherding, A., Glaß, T.: Potential of electric carsharing in urban and rural areas. Transp. Res. Procedia. 4, 374–386 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.028
Scherf, C., Steiner, J., Wolter, F.: E-Carsharing: Erfahrungen, Nutzerakzeptanz und Kundenwünsche. Int. Verkehrswesen. 65, 42–44 (2013)
Ölander, F., Thøgersen, J.: Informing versus nudging in environmental policy. J. Consum. Policy. 37, 341–356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9256-2
Bazerman, M.H.: The relevance of Kahneman and Tversky’s concept of framing to organizational behavior. J. Manag. 10, 333–343 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638401000307
Ruth, J.A., York, A.: Framing information to enhance corporate reputation. J. Bus. Res. 57, 14–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00270-9
Barkan, R., Busemeyer, J.R.: Modeling dynamic inconsistency with a changing reference point. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 16, 235–255 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.444
Chong, D., Druckman, J.N.: Framing Theory. Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10, 103–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
Piñon, A., Gambara, H.: A meta-analytic review of framing effect: risky, attribute and goal framing 7 (2005)
Chandran, S., Menon, G.: When a day means more than a year: effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. J. Consum. Res. 31, 375–389 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1086/422116
Scannell, L., Gifford, R.: Personally relevant climate change: the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environ. Behav. 45(1), 60–85 (2013)
Lee, A.Y., Aaker, J.L.: Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 205–218 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
Avineri, E., Waygood, E.O.D.: Applying valence framing to enhance the effect of information on transport-related carbon dioxide emissions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 48, 31–38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.003
Davis, J.J.: The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism Mass Commun. Q. 72(2), 285–299 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200203
Leiserowitz, A.: Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In: Moser, S.C., Dilling, L. (eds.) Creating a Climate for Change, pp. 44–63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871.005
Updegraff, J.A., Brick, C., Emanuel, A.S., Mintzer, R.E., Sherman, D.K.: Message framing for health: Moderation by perceived susceptibility and motivational orientation in a diverse sample of Americans. Health Psychol. 34, 20–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000101
Kim, N.-Y.: The influence of message framing and issue involvement on promoting abandoned animals adoption behaviors. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 82, 338–341 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.271
Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C., Slothuus, R.: Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Commun. Res. 36, 400–425 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333028
Schlüter, J., Weyer, J.: Car sharing as a means to raise acceptance of electric vehicles: an empirical study on regime change in automobility. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 60, 185–201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.005
Luhmann, C.C., Chun, M.M., Yi, D.-J., Lee, D., Wang, X.-J.: Neural dissociation of delay and uncertainty in intertemporal choice. J. Neurosci. 28, 14459–14466 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5058-08.2008
Smith, C.L., Hantula, D.A.: Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: a comparison of tasks and modes. Behav. Res. Methods. 40, 940–953 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.940
Graham-Rowe, E., et al.: Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: a qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 46, 140–153 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.008
Glass, G.V., Peckham, P.D., Sanders, J.R.: Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Rev. Educ. Res. 42, 237–288 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543042003237
Greenhouse, S.W., Geisser, S.: On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24, 95–112 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289823
Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1988)
Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979)
Maheswaran, D., Meyers-Levy, J.: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. J. Mark. Res. 27, 361–367 (1990)
Updegraff, J.A., Rothman, A.J.: Health message framing: moderators, mediators, and mysteries: health message framing. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass. 7, 668–679 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12056
Chorus, C.G., Molin, E.J.: Travel information as an instrument to change car- drivers’ travel choices: a literature review. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 31 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schrills, T., Zoubir, M., Stahl, J., Drozniak, K., Franke, T. (2020). Good Boy Here or Bad Boy Far Away?. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Cognition and Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49182-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49183-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)