Skip to main content

Remote Testing of Usability in Medical Apps

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare (MobiHealth 2019)

Abstract

Usability tests play an important role in any kind of software, as they limit errors and misunderstandings. Especially in the growing market of medical applications it is indispensable, but time-consuming and expensive. In order to improve the quality of medical applications and remove obstacles for developers, a method has been developed that simplifies testing the usability of mobile medical applications and provides additional data on compliance and effectiveness. Because this test method is remote-controlled and asynchronous, finding examiners is simplified. It also allows more subjects to be found and more data to be collected. This increases user experience and achieves more natural results as study participants act in their natural environment. In order to decide whether the app developed is suitable for this remote testing method, a questionnaire was developed to assist in the decision-making process. The described method will be tested in a study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Research 2 Guidance mHealth App Economics 2017/2018

    Google Scholar 

  2. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Promoting Usability in Healthcare Organizations: Initial Steps and Progress Towards a Healthcare Usability Maturity Model

    Google Scholar 

  3. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Usability Evaluation Guide for Clinicians Practice: https://www.himss.org/himss-emr-usability-evaluation-guide-clinicians-practices-9-essential-principles-software-usability. Accessed 14 May 2019

  4. IOS Design Principles. https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/ios/overview/themes/. Accessed 14 May 2019

  5. Android Design Principles. https://www.designprinciplesftw.com/collections/android-design-principles. Accessed 14 May 2019

  6. Stoyan, S.R., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D.J., Zelenko, O., Tjondronegoro, D., Mani, M.: Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015 Jan-Mar, 3(1), E 27, p. 1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ben Sheiderman’s Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design https://faculty.washington.edu/jtenenbg/courses/360/f04/sessions/schneidermanGoldenRules.html. Accessed 14 May 2019

  8. UX Planet: Mobile UX Design: Key Principles https://uxplanet.org/mobile-ux-design-key-principles-dee1a632f9e6. Accessed 14 May 2019

  9. The Startup, Mobile App Design Principles: 13 Rules for Creating Apps that Stick https://medium.com/swlh/infographics-mobile-app-design-principles-13-rules-for-creating-apps-that-stick-f607959692be. Accessed 14 May 2019

  10. Lienhard, K.R., Legner C.: Principles in Design of Mobile Medical Apps: Guidance for Those who Care. University of Lausanne, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  11. MLSDev: Healthcare Mobile App Development: Types, Trends, & Features https://mlsdev.com/blog/healthcare-mobile-app-development. Accessed 14 May 2019

  12. Albrecht, U.V.: Chances and Risks of Mobile Health (Chancen und Risiken von Gesundheits-Apps) (2016) Hannover, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Brooke, J.: SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale. United Kingdom (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sauer, J., Muenzberg, A., Hein, A., Roesch, N.: Simplify testing of mobile medical applications by using timestamps for remote, automated evaluation. In: 2019 15th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WI Mob) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laugwirtz, B., Held, T., Schrepp, M.: Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: HCI Usability Education, Work, pp. 63–76 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brush, B.A.J., Ames, M., Davis, J.: A comparison of remote and local usability studies for an expert interface. In: CHI Vienna, Austria, pp. 1179–1182 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson, K.E., Rozanski, E.P., Haake, A.R.: Here, there, anywhere: remote usability-testing that works. In: SIGITE 2004, pp. 132–137. ACM, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hartson, H.R., Castillo, J.C., Kelson, J., Neale, W.C.: Remote evaluations: the network as an extension of the usability laboratory. In: CHI 1996, pp. 228–235 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tullis, T., Fleischman, S., McNulity, M., Cinanchette, C., Bergel, M.: An empirical comparison of lab and remote usability-testing on web sites. In: Usability Professionals Association Conference (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dumas, J.C.: Usability evaluation from your desktop. In: Association for Information Systems (AIS) SIGCHI Newsletter, November 2003, pp. 6–8 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elfert, P., Eichelberg, M., Tröger, J., Britz, J., Alexandersson, J., et al.: DiDiER digitized services in dietry counselling for people with increased health risk related to malnutrition and food allergies. In: IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), pp. 100–104. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Muenzberg, A., Sauer, J., Hein, A., Roesch, N.: The use of ETL and data profiling to integrate data and improve quality in food databases. In: 2018 14th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WI Mob), pp. 231–238 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/wimob.2018.8589081

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was done within the framework of the DiDiER project, which is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant 02K14A150). Different institutes are working together on this joint project. Particularly the German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB) as application partner and executor of the study and EUROKEY GmbH Saarbrücken, which took over many parts of the development of the app, are to be mentioned here.

The cooperation between the University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern and Carl von Ossietzky University was extremely positive and beneficial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janina Sauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

figure a
figure b
figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sauer, J., Muenzberg, A., Siewert, L., Hein, A., Roesch, N. (2020). Remote Testing of Usability in Medical Apps. In: O'Hare, G., O'Grady, M., O’Donoghue, J., Henn, P. (eds) Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare. MobiHealth 2019. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49289-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49289-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49288-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49289-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics