Skip to main content

Gender Difference in Preference for Apple Watch Dial Interface

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Interface and the Management of Information. Designing Information (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12184))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1481 Accesses

Abstract

This study uses the dial interface of Apple Watch Series 5 as a research sample to explore the preferences of different genders for the visual style of the Apple Watch dial interface, and analyze the gender differences in consumer visual perception of the Apple Watch interface. In order to summarize the aesthetic emotions of the visual style of the Apple Watch dial interface by different genders. A total of 114 observers participated in this experiment, and analyzed the experimental data collected from 58 males and 56 females. The single-sample t-test and independent sample t-test results show that the visual style of the Apple Watch dial interface is favored by consumers. In terms of visual aesthetics, compared with females, males have a higher preference for the visual interface of Apple Watch. In addition, it is also speculated that males are more receptive to visually complex interfaces than females. According to the results of regression analysis, male groups tend to be more rational and regular, and prefer technological visual interface; while female groups tend to be more active and sensitive. The simple interface, simple style and diversified functions make female consumers have great fun and practicability, and they pay more attention to intelligent life. This study can help to understand the aesthetic preferences of different gender consumers for the visual interface style of products, and provide design strategies for the interface design of consumer electronic products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wang, T., Shan, F.: Research on discussion of gender difference in preference for smart watches based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10272, pp. 263–275. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58077-7_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., Choi, M.: User acceptance of wearable devices: an extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics Inform. 33(2), 256–269 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giang, W.C., Shanti, I., Chen, H.-Y.W., Zhou, A., Donmez, B.: Smartwatches vs. smartphones: a preliminary report of driver behavior and perceived risk while responding to notifications. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp 154–161. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gentile, C., Spiller, N., Noci, G.: How to sustain the customer experience: an overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. Eur. Manag. J. 25(5), 395–410 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bezruczko, N., Schroeder, D.H.: The development of visual preferences in art-trained and non-art-trained schoolchildren. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 122(2), 179–196 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dehghani, M.: Exploring the motivational factors on continuous usage intention of smartwatches among actual users. Behav. Inf. Technol. 37(2), 145–158 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Jung, Y., Kim, S., Choi, B.: Consumer valuation of the wearables: the case of smartwatches. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 899–905 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cyr, D., Head, M., Ivanov, A.: Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Inf. Manag. 43(8), 950–963 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nanda, P., Bos, J., Kramer, K.-L., Hay, C., Ignacz, J.: Effect of smartphone aesthetic design on users’ emotional reaction: an empirical study. TQM J. 20(4), 348–355 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsiao, K.-L., Chen, C.-C.: What drives smartwatch purchase intention? Perspectives from hardware, software, design, and value. Telematics Inform. 35(1), 103–113 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsiao, K.-L.: Android smartphone adoption and intention to pay for mobile Internet: perspectives from software, hardware, design, and value. Libr. Hi Tech 31(2), 216–235 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins, D.W., Kimura, D.: A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behav. Neurosci. 111(4), 845 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herlitz, A., Nilsson, L.-G., Bäckman, L.: Gender differences in episodic memory. Mem. Cogn. 25(6), 801–811 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng, J., Spence, I., Pratt, J.: Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychol. Sci. 18(10), 850–855 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Notarnicola, A., Maccagnano, G., Pesce, V., Tafuri, S., Novielli, G., Moretti, B.: Visual-spatial capacity: gender and sport differences in young Volleyball and Tennis athletes and non-athletes. BMC Res. Notes 7(1), 57 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanan, C., Tong, M.H., Zhang, L., Cottrell, G.W.: SUN: top-down saliency using natural statistics. Vis. Cogn. 17(6–7), 979–1003 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, K.J.: Shape and size matter for smartwatches: effects of screen shape, screen size, and presentation mode in wearable communication. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 22(3), 124–140 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E.: What is beautiful is good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 24(3), 285 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sundar, S.S.: The MAIN model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J. (eds.) Digital media, Youth, and Credibility, pp. 72–100. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Choi, J., Kim, S.: Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 777–786 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong, J.-C., Lin, P.-H., Hsieh, P.-C.: The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Comput. Hum. Behav. 67, 264–272 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu, J.-C., Chang, S.-C.: The study of design watch-shape by using Kansei engineering. J. Comm. Modern. 7(1), 49–69 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miniukovich, A., Sulpizio, S., De Angeli, A.: Visual complexity of graphical user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, p. 20. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Berlyne, D.E.: Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Hemisphere (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moshagen, M., Thielsch, M.T.: Facets of visual aesthetics. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68(10), 689–709 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chuah, S.H.-W., Rauschnabel, P.A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., Lade, S.: Wearable technologies: the role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 276–284 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, J., Hsu, Y. (2020). Gender Difference in Preference for Apple Watch Dial Interface. In: Yamamoto, S., Mori, H. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information. Designing Information. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50020-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50020-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50019-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50020-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics