Skip to main content

Attitudinal and Behavioral Differences Between Older and Younger Adults Using Mobile Devices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technologies, Design and User Experience (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12207))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Research has shown that older adults take more time to perform tasks and have higher satisfaction than younger adults for a variety of activities. Through a series of controlled experiments at the U.S. Census Bureau, we confirm that older adults do take longer to complete surveys on smartphones, but the increase in satisfaction compared to younger adults is only marginally significant. In these experiments, we also found that the age effects do not vary by the smartphone survey designs tested, suggesting that designers could focus on improving designs for older adults and younger adults would benefit from those changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Craik, F.I.M., Salthouse, T.A.: The Handbook of Aging and Cognition, 3rd edn. Psychology Press, NewYork (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hofer, S.M., Alwin, D.F.: Handbook of Cognitive Aging: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2008). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976589

  3. Karlamangla, A.S., Miller-Martinez, D., Aneshensel, C.S., Seeman, T.E., Wight, R.G., Chodosh, J.: Trajectories of cognitive function in late life in the United States: demographic and socioeconomic predictors. Am. J. Epidemiol. 170, 331–342 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bashore, T.R., Osman, A., Heffley III, E.F.: Mental slowing in elderly persons: a cognitive psychophysiological analysis. Psychol. Aging 4(2), 235–244 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.4.2.235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salthouse, T.: When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiol. Aging 30(4), 507–514 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hultsch, D.F., Hertzog, C., Dixon, R.A.: Ability correlates of memory performance in adulthood and aging. Psychol. Aging 5(3), 356–368 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kester, J.D., Benjamin, A.S., Castel, A.D., Craik, F.I.M.: Memory in elderly people. In: Baddely, A.D., Kopelman, M.D., Wilson, B.A. (eds.) The Handbook of Memory Disorders, pp. 543–568. Wiley (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, H., Eppes, A., Diaz, M.T.: Task difficulty modulates age-related differences in the behavioral and neural bases of language production. Neuropsychologia 124, 254–273 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Head, D., Isom, M.: Age effects on wayfinding and route learning skills. Behav. Brain Res. 209(1), 49–58 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tun, P.A., Lachman, M.E.: Age differences in reaction time and attention in a national telephone sample of adults: education, sex, and task complexity matter. Dev. Psychol. 44(5), 1421–1429 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murata, A., Iwase, M.: Usability of touch-panel interfaces for older adults. Hum. Fact. 47(4), 767–776 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sultana, A., Moffatt, K.: Effects of aging on small target selection with touch input. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 12(1), 1–35 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Findlater, L., Froehlich, J.E., Fattal, K., Wobbrock, J.O., Tanya Dastyar, T.: Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013), pp. 343–346. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Rushing, A., Bechtel, L., Gilbert, J.: Use of computer input devices by older adults. J. Appl. Gerontol. 24(5), 419–438 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jin, Z.X., Plocher, T., Kiff, L.: Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: button size and spacing. In: UAHCI 2007 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction: Coping with Diversity, pp. 933–941 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loos, E.F., Romano Bergstrom, J.: Older adults. In: Romano Bergstrom, J., Schall, A.J. (eds.) Eye Tracking in User Experience Design, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 313–329 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Showarah, S., AL-Jawad, N., Sellahewa, H.: Effects of user age on smartphone and tablet use, measured with an eye-tracker via fixation duration, scan-path duration, and saccades proportion. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8514, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Grewal, S., Sahni, R.K.: Effect of smartphone addiction on reaction time in geriatric population. J. Novel Physiotherapy Phys. Rehabil. 6(1), 005–009 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xiong, J., Muraki, S.: Thumb performance of elderly users on smartphone touchscreen. SpringerPlus 5(1), 1218 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy, Q., Mather, M., Carstensen, L.L.: The role of motivation in the age-related positivety effect in autobiographical memory. Psychol. Sci. 15, 208–214 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carstensen, L.L.: Integrating cognitive and emotion paradigms to address the paradox of aging. Cogn. Emot. 33(1), 119–125 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reed, A.E., Chan, L., Mikels, J.A.: Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychol. Aging 29(1), 1–15 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sasse, L.K., Gamer, M., Büchel, C., Brassen, S.: Selective control of attention supports the positivity effect in aging. PLoS One 9(8) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mikels, J.A., Larkin, G.R., Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Carstensen, L.L.: Divergent trajectories in the aging mind: changes in working memory for affective versus visual information with age. Psychol. Aging 20(4), 542–553 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mammarella, N., Di Domenico, A., Palumbo, R., Fairfield, B.: When green is positive and red is negative: aging and the influence of color on emotional memories. Psychol. Aging 31(8), 914–926 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schryer, E., Ross, M.: Does the age-related positivity effect in autobiographical recall reflect differences in appraisal or memory? J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 69(4), 548–556 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nichols, E., Olmsted-Hawala, E., Wang, L.: Optimal designs of text input fields in mobile web surveys for older adults. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11592, pp. 463–481. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22012-9_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Olmsted-Hawala, E., Nichols, E., Falcone, B., Figueroa, I.J., Antoun, C., Wang, L.: Optimal data entry designs in mobile web surveys for older adults. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2018. LNCS, vol. 10926, pp. 335–354. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, L., et al.: Experimentation for developing evidence-based UI standards of mobile survey questionnaires. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2998–3004, Colorado. ACM Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hughes, M., Agrigoroaei, S., Jeon, M., Bruzzese, M., Lachman, M.: Change in cognitive performance from midlife into old age: findings from the midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study – erratum. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 24(8), 891 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the U.S. Census Bureau’s Innovation and Operational Efficiency Program. We thank Russell Sanders, Christopher Antoun, Brian Falcone, Ivonne Figueroa, Alda Rivas, Joanna Lineback, Sabin Lakhe, Kevin Younes, and the MetroStar team. We also thank Eugene Loos, Jenny Childs, Thomas Mathew, Shaun Genter, Paul Beatty, and Joanne Pascale for reviews of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elizabeth Nichols , Erica Olmsted-Hawala , Andrew Raim or Lin Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nichols, E., Olmsted-Hawala, E., Raim, A., Wang, L. (2020). Attitudinal and Behavioral Differences Between Older and Younger Adults Using Mobile Devices. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technologies, Design and User Experience. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12207. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50251-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50252-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics