Skip to main content

OBDEX – Open Block Data Exchange System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1967 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12090))

Abstract

Biobanks have become central structures for the provision of data. Raw data such as whole slide images (WSI) are stored in separate systems (PACS) or in biobank information systems. If segmentation or comparable information is to be exchanged in the context of the compilation of cases for the application of AI systems, the limits of proprietary systems are quickly reached. In order to provide these valuable (meta-) data for the description of biological tissue samples, WSI and analysis results, common standards for data exchange are required. Such standards are not currently available. Ongoing standardization developments, in particular the establishment of DICOM for digital pathology in the field of virtual microscopy, will help to provide some of the missing standards. DICOM alone, however, cannot close the gap due to some of the peculiarities of WSIs and corresponding analysis results. We propose a flexible, modular and expandable storage system - OBDEX (Open Block Data Exchange System), which allows the exchange of meta- and analysis data about tissue blocks, glass slides, WSI and analysis results. OBDEX is based on the FAIR data principles and uses only freely available protocols, standards and software libraries. This facilitates data exchange between institutions and working groups. It supports them in identifying suitable cases and samples for virtual studies and in exchanging relevant metadata. At the same time, OBDEX will offer the possibility to store deep learning models for exchange. A publication of source code, interface descriptions and documentation under a free software license is planned.

The work presented here was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the “BB-IT-Boost” research project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    David Clunie is a member of the DICOM committee.

References

  1. Geert, L., et al.: A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42, 60–88 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song, Y., et al.: A deep learning based framework for accurate segmentation of cervical cytoplasm and nuclei. In: 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 2903–2906, IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henning, H., et al.: Deep learning nuclei detection: a simple approach can deliver state-of-the-art results. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 70, 43–52 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Klauschen, F., et al.: Scoring of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes: from visual estimation to machine learning. Semin. Cancer Biol. 52(2), 151–157 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma, H., et al.: Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic classification of gastric carcinoma using whole slide images in digital histopathology. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 61, 2–13 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hufnagl, P., et al.: Virtual microscopy in modern tissue-biobanks - the ZeBanC example. In: 27th European Congress of Pathology, Extended Abstracts, pp. 41–45. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weinstein, R.S., et al.: Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Human Pathol. 40(8), 1057–1069 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kairos - Biobanking 3.0. https://www.kairos.de/referenzen/konsortium/biobanking-3-0. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  9. Jodogne, S.: The orthanc ecosystem for medical imaging. J. Digit. Imaging 31(3), 341–352 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clunie, D., et al.: Digital imaging and communications in medicine whole slide imaging connectathon at digital pathology association pathology visions 2017. J. Pathol. Inform. 9 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herrmann, M., D. et al.: Implementing the DICOM standard for digital pathology. J. Pathol. Inform. 9 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. DICOM Working Group 26. https://www.dicomstandard.org/wgs/wg-26/. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  13. Godinho, T.M., et al.: An efficient architecture to support digital pathology in standard medical imaging repositories. J. Biomed. Informat. 71, 190–197 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DICOM PS3.1 2019d - Introduction and Overview - 1 Scope and Field of Application. dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part01/chapter1.html. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  15. Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Janardhan, K.S., et al.: Looking forward: cutting-edge technologies and skills for pathologists in the future. Toxicologic pathology (2019). 0192623319873855

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holzinger, A., et al.: Machine learning and knowledge extraction in digital pathology needs an integrative approach. In: Holzinger, A., Goebel, R., Ferri, M., Palade, V. (eds.) Towards Integrative Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10344, pp. 13–50. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69775-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Pohn, B., et al.: Visualization of histopathological decision making using a roadbook metaphor. In: 23rd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bach, S., et al.: On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation. PLoS ONE 10, 7 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Colling, R., et al.: Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a roadmap to routine use in clinical practice. J. Pathol. 249(2), 143–150 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Norman, Z., et al.: Creation and exploration of augmented whole slide images with application to mouse stroke models. In: Modern Pathology, vol. 31 Supplement 2, p. 602 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma, H., et al.: A comparative study of cell nuclei attributed relational graphs for knowledge description and categorization in histopathological gastric cancer whole slide images. In: 2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), pp. 61–66. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Flask (A Python Microframework). http://flask.pocoo.org/. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  24. NGINX. https://www.nginx.com/. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  25. The uWSGI project. https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  26. SQLAlchemy - The Database Toolkit for Python. https://www.sqlalchemy.org/. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  27. Klauschen, F., et al.: Standardized Ki67 diagnostics using automated scoring–clinical validation in the GeparTrio breast cancer study. Clin. Cancer Res. 21(16), 3651–3657 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. CoPaW - Collective Pathology Wisdom, A Platform for Collaborative Whole Slide Image based Case Discussions and Second Opinion. http://digitalpathology.charite.de/CoPaW. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

  29. ONNX: Open Neural Network Exchange Format. https://onnx.ai/. Accessed 29 Nov 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank David Clunie for his feedback on the current state of DICOM for digital pathology and his comments on OBDEX ideas. We also thank Tobias Dumke, Pascal Helbig and Nick Zimmermann (HTW University of Applied Sciences Berlin) for implementing the CoPaW ePathology platform and collaborating on the integration of the OBDEX system. Finally, we would like to thank Erkan Colakoglu for his work on adaptations for distributing OBDEX via Docker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Lindequist .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lindequist, B., Zerbe, N., Hufnagl, P. (2020). OBDEX – Open Block Data Exchange System. In: Holzinger, A., Goebel, R., Mengel, M., Müller, H. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Digital Pathology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12090. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50402-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50402-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50401-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50402-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics