Skip to main content

Applied Webservices Platform Supported Through Modified Edit Distance Algorithm: Automated Phonetic Transcription Grading Tool (APTgt)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12205))

Abstract

The abstract should summarize the contents of the paper in short terms, i.e. 150–250 words. This research proposes a platform to improve the user experience of Communications Disorders (CMDS) faculty and their students. Traditionally CMDS faculty have the task of training new scholars in the field on communication disorders in the craft of phonetic transcription utilizing the using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). This can be a phoneme by phoneme transcription of words that have to be analyzed in a phoneme by phoneme process. In the department of Computer Science (CS), we had to opportunity to engage in this participatory design exercise with CMDS to analyze and automate this process. This project utilizes a variant of the Edit Distance algorithm for preprocessing the distance between the phonetic transcriptions of the professor’s provided key and student’s response. We call this platform, the Automated Phonetic Transcription grading tool, APTgt. The platform dramatically speeds up the grading process (i.e. instant feedback) as compared to traditional manual grading. The case discussed is a complex multivariate problem in the field of Communications Disorders of using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as a transcription language to support students learning the IPA language. Our focus was to develop an engaging, easy to use platform that can support interactive online learning and reduce complexity of evaluation and feedback for transcript tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cheng, I., Basu, A., Goebel, R.: Interactive multimedia for adaptive online education. IEEE Multimed. Mag. 16, 16–24 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Seals, C., Zhang, Q., Cook, T.: An M-learning application to enhance children’s learning experience. Int. J. Recent Innov. Trends Comput. Commun. (IJRITCC) 4(10), 214–222 (2017). ISSN 2321-8169

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tripp, L.O., Seals, C.D., Bassy, R.: Spectrum educational tool: animated scenarios for teacher preparation. J. Online Learn. Res. Pract. 7(2), 15–36 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., Vojt, G.: Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Comput. Educ. 56(2), 429–440 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagler, W., Ebner, M.: Is your university ready for the Ne(x)t-Generation? In: Proceedings of 21st World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 22–26 June 2009, pp. 4344–4351 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nemo, J.: The $107 Billion Industry That Nobody’s Talking About Inc.com (2016). https://www.inc.com/john-nemo/the-107-billion-industry-that-nobodys-talkingabout.html

  7. Anshari, M., Alas, Y., Guan, L.S.: Developing online learning resources: big data, social networks, and cloud computing to support pervasive knowledge. Educ. Inf. Technol. 21(6), 1663–1677 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9407-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kazmer, M.M., Haythornwaite, C.: Multiple perspectives on online learning. ACM SIGGroup Bull. 25(1), 7–11 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan, A.W.K., Chair, S.Y., Sit, J.W.H., Wong, E.M.L., Lee, D.T.F., Fung, O.W.M.: Case-based web learning versus face-to-face learning: a mixed-method study on university nursing students. J. Nurs. Res. 24(1), 31–40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bae, B., Kang, S.S., Hwang, B.Y.: Edit distance calculation by phonetic rules and word-length normalization. In: Proceedings of the European Computing Conference (ECC 2012), Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 315–319 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Speights Atkins, M., Seals, C., Bailey, D.J.: At the intersection of applied sciences: integrated learning models in computer science and software engineering and communication disorders. Sci. Educ. Civic Engagem. Int. J. 11(1), 37–43 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10(8), 707–710 (1966)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Heselwood, B.: Teaching and assessing phonetic transcription: a roundtable discussion. Centre for Languages Linguistics & Area Studies (2007). https://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/2871. Accessed 16 2015

  14. Speights-Atkins, M., Seals, C.D., Bailey, D.: The automated phonetic transcription grading tool: where computer science meets clinical problem solving in communication disorders. In: SENCER Summer Institute August 2018, National Center for Science & Civic Engagement (Highly Acknowledged in Education Scholarship) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knight, R.A.: Sounds for study: speech and language therapy students’ use and perception of exercise podcasts for phonetics. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 22(3), 269–276 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, S., et al.: Software engineering to develop online phonetics educational training: interdisciplinary research with communications sciences and disorders. In: American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE-SE 2020), Auburn AL, p. 11 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wagner, R.A., Fischer, M.J.: The string-to-string correction problem. J. ACM 21(1), 168–173 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1145/321796.321811

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh, W.: How Can I use PA on Canvas Pages? Canvas Community Discussion Board (2018). https://community.canvaslms.com/thread/28472-how-can-i-use-ipa-on-canvas-pages

  19. Garrett, J.J.: Elements of User Experience, pp. 52–56. Mechanical Industry Press, Beijing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cai, L., He, X., Dai, Y., Zhu, K.: Research on B2B2C E-commerce website design based on user experience. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 1087(6), 1–5 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Choi, W., Tulu, B.: Effective use of user interface and user experience in an mHealth application. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl D. Seals .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Seals, C.D. et al. (2020). Applied Webservices Platform Supported Through Modified Edit Distance Algorithm: Automated Phonetic Transcription Grading Tool (APTgt). In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing, Developing and Deploying Learning Experiences. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12205. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50512-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50513-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics