Skip to main content

A Framework for Fusion of T1-Weighted and Dynamic MRI Sequences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR 2020)

Abstract

Breast cancer imaging research has seen continuous progress throughout the years. Innovative visualization tools and easier planning techniques are being developed. Image segmentation methodologies generally have best results when applied to specific types of exams or sequences, as their features enhance and expedite those approaches. Particular methods have more purchase with the segmentation of particular structures. This is the case with diverse breast structures and the respective lesions on MRI sequences, over T1w and Dyn.

The present study presents a methodology to tackle an unapproached task. We aim to facilitate the volumetric alignment of data retrieved from T1w and Dyn sequences, leveraging breast surface segmentation and registration. The proposed method revolves around Canny edge detection and mending potential holes on the surface, in order to accurately reproduce the breast shape. The contour is refined with a Level-set approach and the surfaces are aligned together using a restriction of the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) method. This could easily be applied to other paired same-time, volumetric sequences.

The process seems to have promising results as average two-dimensional contour distances are at sub-voxel resolution and visual results seem well within range for the valid transference of other segmented or annotated structures.

This work was funded by the ERDF - European Regional Development Fund through the Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement and through the Portuguese National Innovation Agency (ANI) as a part of project BCCT.Plan–NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-01768 and by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) within PhD grants number SFRH/BD/135834/2018 and SFRH/BD/115616/2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    BCCT.plan - 3D tool for planning breast cancer conservative treatment - NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-017688.

References

  1. Barber, C.B., Dobkin, D.P., Dobkin, D.P., Huhdanpaa, H.: The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 22(4), 469–483 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1145/235815.235821

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Canny, J.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI–8(6), 679–698 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, T.F., Vese, L.A.: Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(2), 266–277 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/83.902291

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dmitriev, I.D., Loo, C.E., Vogel, W.V., Pengel, K.E., Gilhuijs, K.G.A.: Fully automated deformable registration of breast DCE-MRI and PET/CT. Phys. Med. Biol. 58(4), 1221–1233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/4/1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doran, S.J., et al.: Breast MRI segmentation for density estimation: do different methods give the same results and how much do differences matter? Med. Phys. 44(9), 4573–4592 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fashandi, H., Kuling, G., Lu, Y., Wu, H., Martel, A.L.: An investigation of the effect of fat suppression and dimensionality on the accuracy of breast MRI segmentation using U-nets. Med. Phys. 46(3), 1230–1244 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman, J.H., Bentley, J.L., Finkel, R.A.: An algorithm for finding best matches in logarithmic expected time. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 3(3), 209–226 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1145/355744.355745

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gong, Y.C., Brady, M.: Texture-based simultaneous registration and segmentation of breast DCE-MRI. In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) IWDM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5116, pp. 174–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hopp, T., Baltzer, P., Dietzel, M., Kaiser, W.A., Ruiter, N.V.: 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 7(3), 339–348 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0623-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein, A., et al.: Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. NeuroImage 46(3), 786–802 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, R., et al.: Application of 3D registration for detecting lesions in magnetic resonance breast scans. In: Loew, M.H., Hanson, K.M. (eds.) Medical Imaging 1996: Image Processing, vol. 2710, pp. 646–656. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (1996). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.237968

  12. Ortiz, C.G., Martel, A.L.: Automatic atlas-based segmentation of the breast in MRI for 3D breast volume computation. Med. Phys. 39(10), 5835–5848 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4748504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Song, E., et al.: Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming. Acad. Radiol. 17(11), 1414–1424 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiaohua, C., Brady, M., Lo, J.L.-C., Moore, N.: Simultaneous segmentation and registration of contrast-enhanced breast MRI. In: Christensen, G.E., Sonka, M. (eds.) IPMI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3565, pp. 126–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11505730_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, Y., Qiu, Y., Goldgof, D.B., Sarkar, S., Li, L.: 3D finite element modeling of nonrigid breast deformation for feature registration in X-ray and MR images. In: 2007 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV 2007), pp. 38–38, February 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2007.2

  16. Zhang, Z.: Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 13(2), 119–152 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01427149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João F. Teixeira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Teixeira, J.F., Bessa, S., Gouveia, P.F., Oliveira, H.P. (2020). A Framework for Fusion of T1-Weighted and Dynamic MRI Sequences. In: Campilho, A., Karray, F., Wang, Z. (eds) Image Analysis and Recognition. ICIAR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12132. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50516-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50516-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50515-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50516-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics