Skip to main content

An Evaluation Model of Commercial Ring Designs from Cognitive and Emotional Aspects Based on the Quantification Theory I

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 - Posters (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1226))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2183 Accesses

Abstract

To better cater to aesthetic and emotional needs of contemporary customers, measurement of their subtle and sentimental evaluation and prediction of their perceptual values of commercial jewelries are of growing importance. Rings account for a great majority of jewelry sales. It is representative to research on the relationship between ring design and customers’ perception. The ring form is decomposed into 4 items under morphological analysis. Three bipolar perceptive criteria are identified based on Kansei theory and through literature study and KJ method. 15 samples are selected via manual selecting and cluster analysis. Lastly, an evaluation model based on quantification theory I to predict consumers’ sentimental evaluation of commercial rings is introduced. In this way, user’s subtle cognition and attitude of a ring can be quantified and predicted. Designers can identify dominant design factors and improve their design more efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nagamachi, M.: Perspectives and the new trend of Kansei/affective engineering. TQM J. 20(4), 290–298 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730810881285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nagamachi, M.: Kansei engineering and its applications, 32(6), 289 (1996). https://doi.org/10.5100/jje.32.286

  3. Lin, K.C., Wu, C.F.: Practicing universal design to actual hand tool design process. Appl. Ergon. 50, 8–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shieh, M.D., Li, Y., Yang, C.C.: Product form design model based on multiobjective optimization and multicriteria decision-making. Math. Probl. Eng. 2017, 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5187521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chou, J.R.: A Kansei evaluation approach based on the technique of computing with words. Adv. Eng. Inform. 30(1), 1–15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai, H.H., Lin, Y.C., Yeh, C.H.: Form design of product image using grey relational analysis and neural network models. Comput. Oper. Res. 32(10), 2689–2711 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2004.03.021

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, Y.C., Yeh, C.H., Wang, C.C., Wei, C.C.: Is the linear modeling technique good enough for optimal form design? A comparison of quantitative analysis models. Sci. World J. 2012, 1–13 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/689842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jewelry Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Product (Necklace, Earrings, Ring, Bracelet), By Material Type (Gold, Platinum, Diamond), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2019–2025. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/jewelry-market

  9. Ritchey, T.: General morphological analysis. In: 16th Euro Conference on Operational Analysis (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scupin, R.: The KJ method: a technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology. Hum. Organ. 56(2), 233–237 (1997). https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.56.2.x335923511444655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka, Y.: Review of the methods of quantification. Environ. Health Perspect. 32, 113–123 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7932113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Friborg, O., Martinussen, M., Rosenvinge, J.H.: Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: a psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Personality Individ. Differ. 40(5), 873–884 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Hindawe, J.: Considerations when constructing a semantic differential scale. La Trobe Pap. Linguist. 9(7), 1–9 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks for the help of all the participants in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, T., Shi, J. (2020). An Evaluation Model of Commercial Ring Designs from Cognitive and Emotional Aspects Based on the Quantification Theory I. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_85

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_85

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50731-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50732-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics