Skip to main content

Experts Displayed Better Prediction for Unexpected Basketball Made Shots by Using Ball Clues

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1201))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1154 Accesses

Abstract

Previous shot anticipation task was hard to examine whether the experts rely more on the clue of the players body or the ball trajectory. Thus, four types of anticipation-result shots were employed: (A) IN-IN: an IN shot which is participated as IN. (B) IN-OUT: an OUT shot which is participated as IN. (C) OUT-IN: an IN shot which is participated as OUT. (D) OUT-OUT: an OUT shot which is participated as OUT. There are four time stages (i.e., shooting, rising, high point and falling) of a shot. Participants were asked to make a shot prediction task in which he predicted the fate of the ball. The results suggest for the shooting and rising phrase, compared to the non-athletes, the experts provided more accurate predictions for IN-IN condition and OUT-IN condition, and lower accurate predictions for IN-OUT condition and OUT-OUT condition. It is showed in the results that the experts had advantages for both expected and unexpected IN shots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abreu, A.M., Macaluso, E., Azevedo, R.T., Cesari, P., Urgesi, C., Aglioti, S.M.: Action anticipation beyond the action observation network: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in expert basketball players. Eur. J. Neurosci. 35(10), 1646–1654 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cañal-Bruland, R., Balch, L., Niesert, L.: Judgement bias in predicting the success of one’s own basketball free throws but not those of others. Psychol. Res. 79(4), 548–555 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maglott, J.C., Chiasson, D., Shull, P.B.: Influence of skill level on predicting the success of one’s own basketball free throws. PLoS ONE 14(3), e0214074-e (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu, Y., Zeng, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, S., Wang, D., Tan, X., et al.: The role of visual perception in action anticipation in basketball athletes. Neuroscience 237(5), 29–41 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, Q., Lu, Y., Jaquess, K.J., Zhou, C.: Utilization of cues in action anticipation in table tennis players. J. Sports Sci. 36(23), 2699–2705 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson, R.C., Mogan, P.: Advance visual information, awareness, and anticipation skill. J. Mot. Behav. 39(5), 341–351 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, Y., Feng, T.: The effects of sport expertise and shot results on basketball players’ action anticipation. PLoS ONE 15(1), 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Memmert, D., Unkelbach, C., Ganns, S.: The impact of regulatory fit on performance in an inattentional blindness paradigm. J Gen Psychol. 137(2), 129–139 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Avnet, T., Higgins, E.T.: Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: value transfer from “how” to “what”. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 39(5), 525–530 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian Feng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, Y., Feng, T. (2021). Experts Displayed Better Prediction for Unexpected Basketball Made Shots by Using Ball Clues. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1201. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51041-1_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics