Skip to main content

Does Flipped Classroom Improve Student Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes in STEM Subjects? Evidence from a Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blended Learning. Education in a Smart Learning Environment (ICBL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12218))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The flipped classroom approach has attracted particular interest from educators in the Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM) subject disciplines. Despite its popularity, the effect of the flipped classroom approach on student outcomes compared with conventional learning has not yet been conconclusively determined. Although previous reviews have reported positive student perceptions of flipped courses, this does not necessarily imply improved student learning. This study used a second-order meta-analysis procedure to summarize more than 10 years of research examining the following question: “Does the flipped classroom improve student cognitive and behavioral outcomes across STEM subjects as compared with non-flipped classroom?” A total of 10 primary meta-analyses covering 217 unique STEM studies were analyzed. Results showed that flipped classroom significantly improves student cognitive learning (g = 0.49, p < 0.001), and student behavioral learning (g = 1.70, p < 0.001) as compared to conventional classroom. To validate the results of the second-order meta-analysis, we also conducted a study-level meta-analytic validation. Students’ perceptions of using flipped classroom were also analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., Dawson, P.: Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. High Educ. Res. Dev. 34, 1–14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C.: The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet High. Educ. 25, 85–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bates, S., Galloway, R.: The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huber, E., Werner, A.: A review of the literature on flipping the STEM classroom: preliminary findings. In: Barker, S., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., Colvin, C. (eds.). Show me the learning. Proceedings ASCILITE 2016, Adelaide, pp. 267–274 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., Cross, M.: The evidence for “flipping out”: a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Educ. Today 38, 15–21 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, K.S., et al.: Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta analysis. Med. Educ. 52, 910–924 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Presti, C.R.: The flipped learning approach in nursing education: a literature review. J. Nurs. Educ. 55(5), 252–257 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Seery, M.K.: Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: Emerging trends and potential directions. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 16(4), 758–768 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chua, J., Lateef, F.: The flipped classroom: viewpoints in Asian universities. Educ. Med. J. 6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v6i4.316

  10. Bernard, J.S.: The flipped classroom: fertile ground for nursing education research. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. 12(1), 99–109 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S., Stewart, G.: Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature 555(7695), 175–182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper, H., Koenka, A.C.: The overview of reviews: unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. Am. Psychol. 67(6), 446–462 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Busch, T., Friede, G.: The robustness of the corporate social and financial performance relation: a second-order meta-analysis. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 25(4), 583–608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt, F., Oh, I.-S.: The crisis of confidence in research findings in psychology: is lack of replication the real problem? or is it something else? Arch. Sci. Psychol. 4, 32–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Young, J.: Technology-enhanced mathematics instruction: a second-order meta-analysis of 30 years of research. Educ. Res. Rev. 22, 19–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgings, J.P.T., Rothstein, H.R.: Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Egger, M., Smith, G.D., Schneider, M., Minder, C.: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br. Med. J. 315(7109), 629–634 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duval, S., Tweedie, R.: Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56(2), 455–463 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Polanin, J.R., Tanner-Smith, E.E., Hennessy, E.A.: Estimating the difference between published and unpublished effect sizes: a meta-review. Rev. Educ. Res. 86(1), 207–236 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M.C., Olszewski-Kubilius, P.: What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Rev. Educ. Res. 86(4), 849–899 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamim, R.M., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P.C., Schmid, R.F.: What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: a second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Rev. Educ. Res. 81(1), 4–28 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gillette, C., Rudolph, M., Kimble, C., Rockich-Winston, N., Smith, L., Broedel-Zaugg, K.: A meta-analysis of outcomes comparing flipped classroom and lecture. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 82(5), 433–440 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hew, K.F., Lo, C.K.: Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. Educ. 18, 38 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu, R., Gao, H., Ye, Y., Ni, Z., Jiang, N., Jiang, X.: Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in Chinese baccalaureate nursing education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 79, 94–103 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lo, C.K., Hew, K.F.: The impact of flipped classrooms on student achievement in engineering education: a meta-analysis of 10 years of research. J. Eng. Edu 108(4), 523–546 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lo, C.K., Hew, K.F., Chen, G.: Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: a synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educ. Res. Rev. 22, 50–73 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan, C., Yue, W.G., Fu, Y.: Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in nursing education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin. Nurs. Res. 4(4), 192–200 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, S.: A systematic review and meta-analysis on flipped learning in science education. Unpublished Master thesis. The University of Hong Kong (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, P., et al.: The effectiveness of a flipped classroom on the development of Chinese nursing students’ skill competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ. Today 80, 67–77 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Hattie, J.: Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (Project reference no: 17610919).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khe Foon Hew .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hew, K.F. et al. (2020). Does Flipped Classroom Improve Student Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes in STEM Subjects? Evidence from a Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study. In: Cheung, S., Li, R., Phusavat, K., Paoprasert, N., Kwok, L. (eds) Blended Learning. Education in a Smart Learning Environment. ICBL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51967-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51968-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics