Skip to main content

Extending the COI Framework to K-12 Education: Development and Validation of a Learning Experience Questionnaire

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12218))

Abstract

There has been a lack of theoretically framework and research instruments to explain and explore the complexity of learning experience among K-12 students in traditional classrooms. To address this research need, the present study tentatively developed and validated a presence questionnaire for K-12 classroom (PQ-K12) to examine learning experience through the interplay of three perceived presences, as informed by the community of inquiry (CoI) framework. The presence questionnaire was initially designed with 66 items and was administered among 200 primary school students in central China. A three-step validation process comprising item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted sequentially, leading to the removal of 21 items from the overall scale. The revised questionnaire yielded a strong internal reliability and a moderate structural validity. The preliminary results of this study can inform the future revision of the PQ-K12 questionnaire and provide insights on the key characteristics of K-12 education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nehari, M., Bender, H.: Meaningfulness of a learning experience: a measure for educational outcomes in higher education. High. Educ. 7(1), 1–11 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reigeluth, C.M., Frick, T.W.: Formative research: a methodology for creating and improving design theories. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional-Design Theories and Models—A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, pp. 633–652. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeCarvalho, R.J.: The humanistic paradigm in education. Hum. Psychol. 19(1), 88–104 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, I.E., Seaman, J.: Grade change: TRACKING online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group LLC, Oakland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garrison, D.R., Arbaugh, J.B.: Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. Internet High. Educ. 10(3), 157–172 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swan, K., Ice, P.: The community of inquiry framework ten years later: introduction to the special issue. Internet High. Educ. 13(1–2), 1–4 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arbaugh, J.B.: Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 9(2), 1–21 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 2(2–3), 87–105 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D.R., Archer, W.: Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. 5(2), 1–17 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Akyol, Z., Garrison, D.R., Ozden, M.Y.: Online and blended communities of inquiry: exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 10(6), 65–83 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 15(1), 7–23 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pisutova-Gerber, K., Malovicova, J.: Critical and higher order thinking in online threaded discussions in the Slovak context. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 10(1), 1–15 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schrire, S.: Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: going beyond quantitative analysis. Comput. Educ. 46(1), 49–70 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shea, P., Bidjerano, T.: Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 316–326 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shea, P., Bidjerano, T.: Learning presence: towards a theory of self-efficacy, selfregulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Comput. Educ. 55(4), 1721–1731 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by the Key Research Project of Education Supported by National Social Science Foundation of China, ACA170010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yue Hu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wei, L., Hu, Y., Zuo, M., Luo, H. (2020). Extending the COI Framework to K-12 Education: Development and Validation of a Learning Experience Questionnaire. In: Cheung, S., Li, R., Phusavat, K., Paoprasert, N., Kwok, L. (eds) Blended Learning. Education in a Smart Learning Environment. ICBL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51967-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51968-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics