Skip to main content

Abstract

Defeasible deontic logic has shown to be expressive enough to represent a normative system, and therefore compliance to such a system can be automatically checked by means of classical model checking techniques of logical systems. However, normative systems are not static, as they can be actively changed by the legislator over time, directly, by changing one norm. Moreover norms can change passively, either by effect of the change of another piece of the normative system, or by means of the change of meaning that affects terms employed in the norm.

Although some efforts have been carried out by scholars in the field of legal reasoning about norm change, there is a lack of uniformity in the representation of these changes, and this is an issue when we aim at deploying the law as an automated platform: we need to introduce changes as effects in the semantics of derivation in a logical system, when the unified viewpoint admits a unified representation as well. We adopt the logical paradigm of agency and provide a classification of changes from an agentive viewpoint that allows a unified representation within the logical language for agents LegalRuleML.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Broersen, J.: Issues in designing logical models for norm change. In: Vouros, G., Artikis, A., Stathis, K., Pitt, J. (eds.) OAMAS 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5368, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02377-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Castelfranchi, C.: A cognitive framing for norm change. In: Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Sensoy, M., Sichman, J.S.S. (eds.) COIN 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9628, pp. 22–41. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42691-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cristani, M., Olivieri, F., Rotolo, A.: Changes to temporary norms, pp. 39–48 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dastani, M., Meyer, J.J., Tinnemeier, N.: Programming norm change. J. Appl. Non-Class. Log. 22(1–2), 151–180 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. De, S., Nau, D., Gelfand, M.: Understanding norm change: an evolutionary game-theoretic approach, vol. 3, pp. 1433–1441 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Calardo, E., Rotolo, A., Cristani, M.: Sequence semantics for normative agents. In: Baldoni, M., Chopra, A.K., Son, T.C., Hirayama, K., Torroni, P. (eds.) PRIMA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9862, pp. 230–246. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44832-9_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Cristani, M., Scannapieco, S.: Revision of defeasible preferences. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 104, 205–230 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Rotolo, A., Scannapieco, S.: Computing strong and weak permissions in defeasible logic. J. Philos. Log. 42(6), 799–829 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-013-9295-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Rotolo, A., Scannapieco, S., Cristani, M.: Picking up the best goal an analytical study in defeasible logic. In: Morgenstern, L., Stefaneas, P., Lévy, F., Wyner, A., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2013. LNCS, vol. 8035, pp. 99–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39617-5_12

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Scannapieco, S., Cristani, M.: Superiority based revision of defeasible theories. In: Dean, M., Hall, J., Rotolo, A., Tabet, S. (eds.) RuleML 2010. LNCS, vol. 6403, pp. 104–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16289-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Scannapieco, S., Cristani, M.: Designing for compliance: norms and goals. In: Olken, F., Palmirani, M., Sottara, D. (eds.) RuleML 2011. LNCS, vol. 7018, pp. 282–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24908-2_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Scannapieco, S., Cristani, M.: The hardness of revising defeasible preferences. In: Bikakis, A., Fodor, P., Roman, D. (eds.) RuleML 2014. LNCS, vol. 8620, pp. 168–177. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09870-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in defeasible logic. Log. J. IGPL 18(1), 157–194 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A., Riveret, R., Palmirani, M., Sartor, G.: Variants of temporal defeasible logics for modelling norm modifications, pp. 155–159 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gómez-Sebastià, I., Napagao, S., Salceda, J., Felipe, L.: Towards runtime support for norm change from a monitoring perspective, vol. 918, pp. 71–85 (2012). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84891822441&partnerID=40&md5=685e5bf57faaf9f393c12e85e4ee8bae

  16. Horty, J.: Norm change in the common law. In: Hansson, S.O. (ed.) David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems. OCL, vol. 3, pp. 335–355. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7759-0_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Knobbout, M., Dastani, M., Meyer, J.J.: A dynamic logic of norm change. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 285, 886–894 (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Olivieri, F., Cristani, M., Governatori, G.: Compliant business processes with exclusive choices from agent specification. In: Chen, Q., Torroni, P., Villata, S., Hsu, J., Omicini, A. (eds.) PRIMA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9387, pp. 603–612. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rouleau, M.: NormSim: an agent-based model of norm change (2016). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84978428157&doi=10.1109%2fICoCS.2015.7483251&partnerID=40&md5=825116789dda19ec5a3e6fd152bd61eb

  20. Scannapieco, S., Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Cristani, M.: A methodology for plan revision under norm and outcome compliance. In: Boella, G., Elkind, E., Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Dignum, F., Purvis, M.K. (eds.) PRIMA 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8291, pp. 324–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44927-7_22

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomazzoli, C., Cristani, M., Karafili, E., Olivieri, F.: Non-monotonic reasoning rules for energy efficiency. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 9(3), 345–360 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matteo Cristani , Claudio Tomazzoli , Francesco Olivieri or Luca Pasetto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cristani, M., Tomazzoli, C., Olivieri, F., Pasetto, L. (2020). An Ontology of Changes in Normative Systems from an Agentive Viewpoint. In: De La Prieta, F., et al. Highlights in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Trust-worthiness. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1233. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51999-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51999-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51998-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51999-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics