Skip to main content

Qualified Targeting Through Data Aggregators in Permissioned Blockchain Settings: A Model for Auditable Transactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 595 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1238))

Abstract

Data aggregators can leverage personal data for the benefit of their users in their role of mediators with enterprises that are willing to target qualified user segments with customized offerings. However, such type of transaction must comply with personal data protection regulation and provide a fair and auditable context for business partners. In this paper, the components of a solution for that problem in the context of a permissioned, private business network are described, along with an implementation using the Quorum enterprise derivative of Ethereum. The results of that design are expressed as a combination of schemas, protocols and smart contracts. The resulting model may serve as a blueprint for experimenting data market mechanisms that exploit the unique value of aggregators in a secure, transparent and auditable framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.leadcoin.network/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/hyperledger-indy.

  3. 3.

    https://www.datomic.com/.

  4. 4.

    https://kantarainitiative.org/.

  5. 5.

    https://www.goquorum.com/.

  6. 6.

    Note that this would require that the aggregator has a database that is immutable, i.e. an accrual of facts in time, as for example provided by Datomic.

  7. 7.

    A better approach may be that of contacting users that have been surveyed and voluntarily disclosed they knew of the proposal via the aggregator.

References

  1. Benchoufi, M., Porcher, R. Ravaud, P.: Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Research, 6 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ceri, S., Gottlob, G., Tanca, L.: What you always wanted to know about Datalog (and never dared to ask). IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1(1), 146–166 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, H., Laine, K., Rindal, P.: Fast private set intersection from homomorphic encryption. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1243–1255 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ertemel, A.V.: Implications of blockchain technology on marketing. J. Int. Trade Logist. Law 4(2), 35–44 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fayyaz, N., Ullah, I., Khusro, S.: On the current state of linked open data: issues, challenges, and future directions. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. (IJSWIS) 14(4), 110–128 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finck, M.: Blockchains and data protection in the European Union. Eur. Data Prot. Law Rev. 4, 17 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. García-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M.A., Sánchez-Alonso, S.: The case for ontologies in expressing decisions in decentralized energy systems. In: Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research, pp. 365–376. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haikel-Elsabeh, M., Nouet, S., Nayaradou, M.: How personal finance management influences consumers’ motivations and behavior regarding online banking services. Commun. Strat. 103, 15 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lagos, N., Mos, A., Cortes-Cornax, M.: Towards semantically-aided domain specific business process modeling. Data Technol. Appl. 52(4), 463–481 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maestre, R., Duque, J., Rubio, A., Arévalo, J.: Reinforcement learning for fair dynamic pricing. In: Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, pp. 120–135. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Munier, L., Kemball-Cook, A.: Blockchain and the general data protection regulation: reconciling protection and innovation. J. Secur. Oper. Custody 11(2), 145–157 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sicilia, M.A., Visvizi, A.: Blockchain and OECD data repositories: opportunities and policymaking implications. Library Hi Tech 37(1), 30–42 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tucker, C.E.: Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Mark. Res. 51(5), 546–562 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wessling, F., Ehmke, C., Hesenius, M., Gruhn, V.: How much blockchain do you need? towards a concept for building hybrid DAPP architectures. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Engineering for Blockchain (WETSEB), pp. 44–47 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, Y.J., Chen, S.C., Pan, C.I.: Entrepreneurship in the internet age: internet, entrepreneurs, and capital resources. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. (IJSWIS) 15(4), 21–30 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan, S., Wang, J., Zhao, X.: Real-time bidding for online advertising: measurement and analysis. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Data Mining for Online Advertising, pp. 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, T.: Examining users’ knowledge sharing behaviour in online health communities. Data Technol. Appl. 53(4), 442–455 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project funded by (proyecto financiado por) FEDER/ Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades - Agencia Estatal de Investigación/ Proyecto RTC-2017-6779-7, “Uso de blockchain en una plataforma financiera basada en Big Data, Inteligencia Artificial, machine learning, algoritmos predictivos y herramientas de lenguaje natural para la contratación, gestión e intercambio de activos no financieros.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel-Angel Sicilia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sicilia, MA. et al. (2020). Qualified Targeting Through Data Aggregators in Permissioned Blockchain Settings: A Model for Auditable Transactions. In: Prieto, J., Pinto, A., Das, A., Ferretti, S. (eds) Blockchain and Applications. BLOCKCHAIN 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52535-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics