Skip to main content

Just Fun and Games? Utilitarian and Hedonic Chatbot Perceptions and Their Role for Continuance Intentions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 389))

Abstract

Conversational agents (CAs) offer huge potential for service companies by creating social closeness and enabling fast and scalable communication with customers. However, investigation of utilitarian and especially hedonic value as driving motivations for using CAs is still nascent. We found social presence to be an important predictor for hedonic and utilitarian value and subsequent continuance intention. Moreover, we reveal customers’ continuance intention is determined primarily by hedonic value when expecting a CA, whereas focus shifts to utilitarian values if customers expect a human employee. With our results, CA services can be better tailored to customer needs and company service goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. eMarketer. https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/. Accessed 02 Dec 2019

  2. Beverungen, D., Breidbach, C.F., Poeppelbuss, J., Tuunainen, V.K.: Smart service systems: an interdisciplinary perspective. Inf. Syst. J. 29(6), 1201–1206 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., Adam, M., Maedche, A.: Faster is not always better. Understanding the effect of dynamic response delays in human-chatbot interaction. In: Twenty-Sixth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Portsmouth (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schuetzler, R.M., Giboney, J.S., Grimes, G.M., Nunamaker, J.F.: The influence of conversational agents on socially desirable responding. In: Fifty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schuetzler, R.M., Grimes, G.M., Giboney, J.S.: An investigation of conversational agent relevance, presence, and engagement. In: Twenty-Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), New Orleans (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail. An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Q. 21(4), 389–400 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Facebook, Inc. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/662144/umfrage/anzahl-der-verfuegbaren-chatbots-fuer-den-facebook-messenger/. Accessed 02 Dec 2019

  8. Freedman International. https://www.statista.com/statistics/828101/world-chatbots-adoption-rate-intention/. Accessed 02 Dec 2019

  9. Drift. https://www.statista.com/statistics/818859/chatbot-usage-benefits-customers-expect-to-enjoy-us/. Accessed 02 Dec 2019

  10. LivePerson. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/797057/umfrage/gruende-der-nutzung-von-chatbots-in-deutschland/. Accessed 02 Dec 2019

  11. Rzepka, C., Berger, B.: User interaction with AI-enabled systems. A systematic review of IS research. In: Thirty-Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lim, E.T.K., Cyr, D., Tan, C.W.: Untangling utilitarian and hedonic consumption behaviors in online shopping. In: Sixteenth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Ho Chi Minh City (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gefen, D., Straub, D.: Managing user trust in B2C e-Services. e-Serv. J. 2(2), 7–24 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Chervany, N.L.: Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q. 23(2), 183–213 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qiu, L., Benbasat, I.: Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents. A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 25(4), 145–182 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Choi, J., Lee, H.J., Kim, Y.C.: The influence of social presence on customer intention to reuse online recommender systems: the roles of personalization and product type. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 16(1), 129–154 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, C.-F., Wang, J.-P.: Customer participation, value co-creation and customer loyalty - a case of airline online check-in system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 346–352 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, A., Solomon, S., Mirchandani, D., Lacity, M., Porra, J.: The role of service agent, service quality, and user satisfaction in self-service technology. In: Thirty-Fourth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milan (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding information systems continuance. An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 25(3), 351–370 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, S.-C., Chen, H.H., Chen, M.-F.: Determinants of satisfaction and continuance intention towards self-service technologies. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 109(9), 1248–1263 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bhattacherjee, A.: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decis. Supp. Syst. 32(2), 201–214 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dabholkar, P.A.: Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality. Int. J. Res. Mark. 13(1), 29–51 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R., Griffin, M.: Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consum. Res. 20(4), 644–656 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van der Heijden, H.: User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q. 28(4), 695–704 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cetto, A., Klier, J., Klier, M.: Why should I do it myself? Hedonic and utilitarian motivations of customers’ intention to use self-service technologies. In: Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 65(8), 689–708 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mann, J.A., MacDonald, B.A., Kuo, I.-H., Li, X., Broadbent, E.: People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 112–117 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, S., Choi, J.: Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation. Effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 103, 95–105 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Atteslander, P.: Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 192–222 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior, An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lin, C.S., Wu, S., Tsai, R.J.: Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Inf. Manag. 42(5), 683–693 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Alphabet Inc. https://dialogflow.com/. Accessed 02 Dec 2019

  35. Holtgraves, T., Han, T.-L.: A procedure for studying online conversational processing using a chat bot. Behav. Res. Methods 39(1), 156–163 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmitz, C. http://www.limesurvey.org. Accessed 02 Dec 2019

  37. clickworker.com Inc. https://clickworker.com/. Accessed 02 Dec 2019

  38. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., Gosling, S.D.: Amazon’s mechanical turk. A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6(1), 3–5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mason, W., Suri, S.: Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s mechanical turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1), 1–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Running experiments on Amazon mechanical turk. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5(5), 411–419 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modeling in practice. A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3), 411 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chiu, C.-M., Wang, E.T.G., Fang, Y.-H., Huang, H.-Y.: Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce. The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Inf. Syst. J. 24(1), 1–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lowry, P.B., Gaskin, J.: Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory. When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 57(2), 123–146 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chin, W.W.: Commentary. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q. 22(1), vii–xvi (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM. Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theor. Pract. 19(2), 139–152 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New-York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kline, R.B., Santor, D.A.: Principles & practice of structural equation modelling. Can. Psychol. 40(4), 381 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Garson, G.D.: Partial Least Squares: Regression and Structural Equation Models. Statistical Associates Publishers, Asheboro (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Botti, S., McGill, A.L.: The locus of choice: personal causality and satisfaction with hedonic and utilitarian decisions. J. Consum. Res. 37(6), 1065–1078 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bhattacherjee, A., Lin, C.-P.: A unified model of IT continuance. Three complementary perspectives and crossover effects. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24(4), 364–373 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Bedué .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix – Questionnaire Items

Appendix – Questionnaire Items

Table 5. Constructs and questionnaire items

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bedué, P. (2020). Just Fun and Games? Utilitarian and Hedonic Chatbot Perceptions and Their Role for Continuance Intentions. In: Abramowicz, W., Klein, G. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 389. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53337-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53337-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53336-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53337-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics