Skip to main content

Improving Policy Generalization for Teacher-Student Reinforcement Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12275))

  • 1275 Accesses

Abstract

Teacher-student reinforcement learning is a popular approach that aims to accelerate the learning of new agents with advice from trained agents. In these methods, budgets are introduces to limit the amount of advice to prevent over-advising. However, existing budget-based methods tend to use up budgets in the early training stage to help students learn initial policies fast. As a result, initial policies are some kind solidified, which is not beneficial for improving policy generalization. In this paper, to overcome advising intensively in the early training stage, we enable advising in the entire training stage in a decreasing way. Specifically, we integrate advice into reward signals and propose an advice-based extra reward method, and integrate advice into exploration strategies and propose an advice-based modified epsilon method. Experimental results show that the proposed methods can effectively improve the policy performance on general tasks, without loss of learning speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amir, O., Kamar, E., Kolobov, A., Grosz, B.J.: Interactive teaching strategies for agent training. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 804–811. AAAI Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, K.D.: Academic achievement - a view from the top. The Illinois valedictorian project. Academic Achievement, p. 76 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buşoniu, L., Babuška, R., De Schutter, B.: Multi-agent reinforcement learning: an overview. In: Srinivasan, D., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Innovations in Multi-agent Systems and Applications - 1. SCI, vol. 310, pp. 183–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14435-6_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Clouse, J.A.: On integrating apprentice learning and reinforcement learning (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cruz, F., Magg, S., Weber, C., Wermter, S.: Improving reinforcement learning with interactive feedback and affordances. In: 4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics, pp. 165–170. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cruz, F., Magg, S., Weber, C., Wermter, S.: Training agents with interactive reinforcement learning and contextual affordances. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. 8(4), 271–284 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffith, S., Subramanian, K., Scholz, J., Isbell, C.L., Thomaz, A.L.: Policy shaping: integrating human feedback with reinforcement learning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2625–2633 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ilhan, E., Gow, J., Perez-Liebana, D.: Teaching on a budget in multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Games, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matignon, L., Laurent, G.J., Le Fort-Piat, N.: Independent reinforcement learners in cooperative Markov games: a survey regarding coordination problems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 27(1), 1–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. OpenAI: Openai five (2018). https://blog.openai.com/openai-five/

  11. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor, M.E., Carboni, N., Fachantidis, A., Vlahavas, I., Torrey, L.: Reinforcement learning agents providing advice in complex video games. Connect. Sci. 26(1), 45–63 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Torrey, L., Taylor, M.: Teaching on a budget: agents advising agents in reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, pp. 1053–1060 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zimmer, M., Viappiani, P., Weng, P.: Teacher-student framework: a reinforcement learning approach. In: AAMAS Workshop Autonomous Robots and Multirobot Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ding Bo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xudong, G., Hongda, J., Xing, Z., Dawei, F., Bo, D., Jie, X. (2020). Improving Policy Generalization for Teacher-Student Reinforcement Learning. In: Li, G., Shen, H., Yuan, Y., Wang, X., Liu, H., Zhao, X. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55393-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55393-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55392-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55393-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics