Skip to main content

Human-Centred Automated Reasoning for Regulatory Reporting via Knowledge-Driven Computing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Artificial Intelligence Theory and Applications. Artificial Intelligence Practices (IEA/AIE 2020)

Abstract

The rise in both the complexity and volume of regulations in the regulatory landscape have contributed to an increase in the awareness of the level of automation necessary for becoming fully compliant. Nevertheless, the question of how exactly to become fully compliant by adhering to all necessary laws and regulations remains. This paper presents a human-centred, knowledge-driven approach to regulatory reporting. A given regulation is represented in a controlled natural language form including its metadata and bindings, with the assistance of subject matter experts. This representation of a semi-formal controlled natural language translates into a self-executable formal representation via a context-free grammar. A meta reasoner with the knowledge to execute the given self-executable formal representation while generating regulatory reports including explanations on derived results has been developed. Finally, the proposed approach has been implemented as a prototype and validated in the realm of financial regulation: Money Market Statistical Reporting Regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/financial_markets_and_interest_rates/money_market/html/index.en.html.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/DilhanAMS/conferences/tree/master/iea-aie2020.

References

  1. Al Haider, N., et al.: Solving financial regulatory compliance using software contracts. Presented at the 22nd International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Araszkiewicz, M.: Analogy, similarity and factors. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law - ICAIL 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 101–105. ACM Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arner, D.W., et al.: FinTech, RegTech and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwest. J. Int. Law Bus. 37(3), 371–414 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beach, T.H., et al.: A rule-based semantic approach for automated regulatory compliance in the construction sector. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(12), 5219–5231 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Butler, T., O’Brien, L.: Understanding RegTech for digital regulatory compliance. In: Lynn, T., Mooney, J.G., Rosati, P., Cummins, M. (eds.) Disrupting Finance. PSDBET, pp. 85–102. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Casey, B., et al.: Rethinking explainable machines: the GDPR’s “right to explanation” debate and the rise of algorithmic audits in enterprise. Berkeley Technol. Law J. 34, 145–189 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ceci, M., et al.: Making sense of regulations with SBVR. In: RuleML (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chartis Research, IBM: AI in RegTech: A Quiet Upheaval (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dimyadi, J., Amor, R.: Regulatory knowledge representation for automated compliance audit of BIM-based models (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duff, Phelps: Global Regulatory Outlook 2018: Viewpoint 2018 Opinions on Global Financial Services Regulation and Industry Developments for the Year Ahead (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elgammal, A., Butler, T.: Towards a framework for semantically-enabled compliance management in financial services. In: Toumani, F., et al. (eds.) ICSOC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8954, pp. 171–184. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22885-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ford, R., et al.: Automating financial regulatory compliance using ontology+rules and sunflower. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems, pp. 113–120. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fuchs, N.E., Schwitter, R.: Specifying logic programs in controlled natural language. In: Workshop on Computational Logic for Natural Language Processing, Edinburgh, p. 16 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gurkan, C.: Banks’ interactions with listed non-financial firms as a determinant of corporate governance in banking: an agency theory analysis. In: Díaz Díaz, B., Idowu, S.O., Molyneux, P. (eds.) Corporate Governance in Banking and Investor Protection. CSEG, pp. 21–35. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70007-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Haj, A., Balouki, Y., Gadi, T.: Automatic extraction of SBVR based business vocabulary from natural language business rules. In: Khoukhi, F., Bahaj, M., Ezziyyani, M. (eds.) AIT2S 2018. LNNS, vol. 66, pp. 170–182. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11914-0_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hashmi, M., et al.: Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 57(1), 79–133 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ismail, A.S., et al.: A review on BIM-based automated code compliance checking system. In: 2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), Langkawi, Malaysia, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kholkar, D., et al.: Towards automated generation of regulation rule bases using MDA. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, Porto, Portugal, pp. 617–628. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhn, T.: A survey and classification of controlled natural languages. Comput. Linguist. 40(1), 121–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis, J.R.: Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQ. SIGCHI Bull. 23(1), 78–81 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malsane, S., et al.: Development of an object model for automated compliance checking. Autom. Constr. 49, 51–58 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Massey, A.K., et al.: Identifying and classifying ambiguity for regulatory requirements. Presented at the August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  23. Merritt, D.: Building Expert Systems in Prolog. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8911-8

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rattanasawad, T., et al.: A comparative study of rule-based inference engines for the semantic web. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E101.D(1), 82–89 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roychoudhury, S., Sunkle, S., Choudhary, N., Kholkar, D., Kulkarni, V.: A case study on modeling and validating financial regulations using (semi-) automated compliance framework. In: Buchmann, R.A., Karagiannis, D., Kirikova, M. (eds.) PoEM 2018. LNBIP, vol. 335, pp. 288–302. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02302-7_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Roychoudhury, S., et al.: From natural language to SBVR model authoring using structured english for compliance checking. In: 2017 IEEE 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 73–78 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sadiq, S., Governatori, G.: Managing regulatory compliance in business processes. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 2. IHIS, pp. 265–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwitter, R.: Controlled natural languages for knowledge representation. In: 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Beijing, China, pp. 1113–1121 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sesen, M.B., et al.: An ontological framework for automated regulatory compliance in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Comput. Chem. Eng. 34(7), 1155–1169 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stefik, M.: Introduction to Knowledge Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sterling, L., Shapiro, E.Y.: The Art of Prolog: Advanced Programming Techniques. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Robbert Haring, Vaibhav Saxena, Priyanka Kumar, John Marapengopie, Tim Slingsby for useful discussions and their expertise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilhan J. Thilakarathne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thilakarathne, D.J., Al Haider, N., Bosman, J. (2020). Human-Centred Automated Reasoning for Regulatory Reporting via Knowledge-Driven Computing. In: Fujita, H., Fournier-Viger, P., Ali, M., Sasaki, J. (eds) Trends in Artificial Intelligence Theory and Applications. Artificial Intelligence Practices. IEA/AIE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55789-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55789-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55788-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55789-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics