Skip to main content

Metrics and Dashboard for Level 2 – Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1251))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the recent years, the amount of metrics collected and monitored in a project has been grown. This increases the time and effort required to create and track the success of an organization or of a particular activity, but often does not lead to an improvement in project management. In this article we will show a different approach to finding those essential metrics that should not be missing in any project status report, especially for smaller teams or application projects. We will show how to obtain a complete list of generally useful metrics per process (taking into account the VDA scope) and how to extract from this list the two or three key metrics per process based on a risk evaluation to finally arrive at a lean metric framework. The processes Change Request Management (SUP.10) and Software Requirements Analysis (SWE.1) are used as examples described in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Automotive SPICE©3.1, Process Assessment Model, VDA QMC Working Group

    Google Scholar 

  2. Automotive SPICE©Guidelines, 2nd edn., VDA QMC Working Group 13, November 2017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miklos, B., Richard, M., Davidson, A.G.: The impact of national cultural factors on the effectiveness of process improvement methods: the 3rd dimension. In: Proceedings of the 11th ICSQ Conference, ASQ, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biró, M., Messnarz, R., Colomo‐Palacios, R.: Software process improvement leveraged in various application domains. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 26(5), 465–467 (2014). (Special Issue: Software process improvement leveraged in various application domains)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biró, M., Messnarz, R.: Key success factors for business based improvement. In: Proceedings of the EuroSPI 1999 Conference, Pori (1999). (Pori School of Technology and Economics. Ser. A., 25.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Messnarz, R., Sehr, M., Wüstemann, I., Humpohl, J., Ekert, D.: Experiences with SQIL – SW quality improvement leadership approach from Volkswagen. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 421–435. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Korsaa, M., et al.: The SPI manifesto and the ECQA SPI manager certification scheme. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 24(5), 525–540 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korsaa, M., et al.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 25(4), 381–391 (2013). (Special Issue: Selected Industrial Experience Papers of EuroSPI 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Macher, G., Sporer, H., Brenner, E., Kreiner, C.: Supporting cyber-security based on hardware-software interface definition. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2016. CCIS, vol. 633, pp. 148–159. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Macher, G., Messnarz, R., Kreiner, C., et. al.: Integrated safety and security development in the automotive domain. Working Group 17AE-0252/2017-01-1661, SAE International, June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  11. Macher, G., Much, A., Riel, A., Messnarz, R., Kreiner, C.: Automotive SPICE, safety and cybersecurity integration. In: Tonetta, S., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10489, pp. 273–285. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Messnarz, R., Tully, C.J., Biro, M.: Better Software Practice for Business Benefit: Principles and Experiences. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Messnarz, R., Ekert, D., Reiner, M., O’Suilleabhain, G.: Human resources based improvement strategies—the learning factor. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 13(4), 355–362 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Messnarz, R., Spork, G., Riel A., Tichkiewitch, S.: Dynamic learning organisations supporting knowledge creation for competitive and integrated product design. In: Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference – Competitive Design, Cranfield University, 30–31 March 2009, p. 104 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Messnarz, R., Kreiner, C., Riel, A.: Integrating automotive SPICE, functional safety, and cybersecurity concepts: a cybersecurity layer model. Softw. Qual. Prof. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Messnarz, R., Much, A., Kreiner, C., Biro, M., Gorner, J.: Need for the continuous evolution of systems engineering practices for modern vehicle engineering. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 439–452. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Helmar, K.: HIS Source Code Metrics (2008). https://emenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/HIS-sc-metriken.1.3.1_e.pdf

  18. Ekert, D., Steger, B., Messnarz, R.: Functional roadmap - scheduling in complex mechatronic projects. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2014). Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. IBM Workflow Management. https://www.ibm.com/products/ibm-engineering-workflow-management. Accessed 30 Apr 2020

  20. BIRT. https://www.eclipse.org/birt/. Accessed 30 Apr 2020

  21. IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next. https://www.ibm.com/cz-en/marketplace/requirements-management-doors-next. Accessed 30 Apr 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work is partially supported by Grant of SGS No. SP2020/62, VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhardt Steger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Steger, B., Ekert, D., Messnarz, R., Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., Velart, Z. (2020). Metrics and Dashboard for Level 2 – Experience. In: Yilmaz, M., Niemann, J., Clarke, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56440-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56441-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics