Skip to main content

Application of Mutually Integrated International Standards (A-SPICE PAM 3.1 & IATF 16949/2016)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1251))

Abstract

In automotive industry, different standards such as Automotive SPICE PAM 3.1 and IATF 16949:2016 are always followed to ensure that organizations will deliver outcomes with high quality and maturity level considering that the automotive industry is one of the top industries worldwide in the quality standards. Application of both standards proved to have common requirements and practices to meet their defined objects, but with different elaboration of the same requirement in across the different standard. In real life, organization has to define to different internal entities to ensure compliance to the both standards, which leads to deficiency in terms of efforts and cost. This paper is an extension to a previous paper [17, 18] that suggested a new automotive SPICE practices that enables assessments to check compliance of the two standards in an integrated way and map the non-conformities detected to requirements of both standards. In this paper, demonstration will be presented through a case study performed with a certain methodology to illustrate the effectiveness and usability of application of new proposed practices to detect some gaps common between the two standards by only conducting one project assessment.

S. Sameh—Competent ASPICE Assessor, Process Improvement Expert & DBA Candidate.

S. EL-Toukhi—Provisional ASPICE Assessor & Principal Quality Assurance Engineer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model, Process Assessment Model Version 3.1, 1 November 2017. http://www.automotivespice.com/

  2. The Automotive Quality Management System Standard, known as IATF 16949:2016, 1 October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO/TS IS 16949:2009, Quality management systems - Particular requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2008 for automotive production and relevant service part organizations, International Organization for Standardization, June 2009

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 9001:2015, Quality management systems Requirements, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO/IEC 12207:2008, Systems and software engineering – Software life cycle processes (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. CMMI for development V3.1

    Google Scholar 

  7. SPI MANIFESTO Version A.1.2 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IATF 16949 global website. www.iatfglobalozsversight.org. Accessed Jan 2019

  9. Automotive SPICE pocket guide version 3 by Kuglermaag, January 2019

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sabar, S.: Software process improvement and lifecycle models in automotive industry. Final thesis, Linkopings Universitet, Sweden, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peldzius, S., Ragaisis, S.: Comparison of maturity levels in CMMI–DEV and ISO/IEC 15504. In: Proceedings of the “Applications of Mathematics and Computer Engineering” (CEMATH 2011) Conference. ISBN 978-960-474-270-7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoermann, K., Mueller, M., Dittmann, L., Zimmer, J.: Automotive SPICE in Practice: Surviving Implementation and Assessment, Rocky Noor (2008). ISBN 978-‐1933952291

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sassenburg, H., Kitson, D.: A Comparative Analysis of CMMI and Automotive SPICE, Presentation, June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  14. https://sites.google.com/a/valeo.com/automotive-quality-standards/. Accessed Jan 2019

  15. IATF 16949 Gap analysis Tool by AIAG, January 2019

    Google Scholar 

  16. Process Assessment Model SPICE for Mechanical Engineering V1.6 by INTACS

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira, P., Ferreira, André L., Dias, D., Pereira, T., Monteiro, P., Machado, R.J.: An analysis of the commonality and differences between ASPICE and ISO26262 in the context of software development. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 216–227. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Makkar, S.S., Abdelfatah, A.M., Yousef, A.H.: Automotive standards compliance cost reduction by mutual integration between automotive SPICE and IATF 16949:2016. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Samer Sameh or Sherif EL-Toukhi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sameh, S., EL-Toukhi, S. (2020). Application of Mutually Integrated International Standards (A-SPICE PAM 3.1 & IATF 16949/2016). In: Yilmaz, M., Niemann, J., Clarke, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56440-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56441-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics