Skip to main content

Camera Captured DIQA with Linearity and Monotonicity Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Document Analysis Systems (DAS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 12116))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Document image quality assessment (DIQA), which predicts the visual quality of the document images, can not only be applied to estimate document’s optical character recognition (OCR) performance prior to any actual recognition, but also provides immediate feedback on whether the documents meet the quality requirements for other high level document processing and analysis tasks. In this work, we present a deep neural network (DNN) to accomplish the DIQA task, where a Saimese based deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) is employed with customized losses to improve system’s capability of linearity and monotonicity to predict the quality of document images. Based on the proposed network along with the new losses, the obtained DCNN achieves the state-of-the-art quality assessment performance on the public datasets. The source codes and pre-trained models are available at https://gitlab.com/xujun.peng/DIQA-linearity-monotonicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alaei, A.: A new document image quality assessment method based on hast derivations. In: 15th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 1244–1249 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alaei, A., Conte, D., Martineau, M., Raveaux, R.: Blind document image quality prediction based on modification of quality aware clustering method integrating a patch selection strategy. Expert Syst. Appl. 108, 183–192 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ba, J., Caruana, R.: Do deep nets really need to be deep? In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 27, pp. 2654–2662 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blando, L.R., Kanai, J., Nartker, T.A.: Prediction of OCR accuracy using simple image features. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 319–322 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bui, Q.A., Molard, D., Tabbone, S.: Predicting mobile-captured document images sharpness quality. In: 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS), pp. 275–280 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cannon, M., Hochberg, J., Kelly, P.: Quality assessment and restoration of typewritten document images. Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recogn. 2(2), 80–89 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100320050039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garg, R., Chaudhury, S.: Automatic selection of parameters for document image enhancement using image quality assessment. In: 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS), pp. 422–427 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gorissen, D., Couckuyt, I., Demeester, P., Dhaene, T., Crombecq, K.: A surrogate modeling and adaptive sampling toolbox for computer based design. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 2051–2055 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, X., Shen, L., Yu, L., Jiang, M., Feng, G.: No-reference screen content image quality assessment based on multi-region features. Neurocomputing 386, 30–41 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang, L., Ye, P., Li, Y., Doermann, D.: A deep learning approach to document image quality assessment. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2570–2574 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, J., Chen, F., Doermann, D.: Sharpness estimation for document and scene images. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012), pp. 3292–3295 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar, J., Ye, P., Doermann, D.: A dataset for quality assessment of camera captured document images. In: Iwamura, M., Shafait, F. (eds.) CBDAR 2013. LNCS, vol. 8357, pp. 113–125. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05167-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, H., Zhu, F., Qiu, J.: CG-DIQA: no-reference document image quality assessment based on character gradient. In: 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 3622–3626 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, H., Zhu, F., Qiu, J.: Towards document image quality assessment: a text line based framework and a synthetic text line image dataset. In: 15th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 551–558 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, P., Peng, L., Cai, J., Ding, X., Ge, S.: Attention based RNN model for document image quality assessment. In: 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), vol. 01, pp. 819–825 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, T., Dooms, A.: A deep transfer learning approach to document image quality assessment. In: 15th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 1372–1377 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ma, K., Liu, W., Liu, T., Wang, Z., Tao, D.: dipIQ: blind image quality assessment by learning-to-rank discriminable image pairs. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(8), 3951–3964 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Nayef, N., Luqman, M.M., Prum, S., Eskenazi, S., Chazalon, J., Ogier, J.: SmartDoc-QA: a dataset for quality assessment of smartphone captured document images - single and multiple distortions. In: 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 1231–1235 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peng, X., Cao, H., Natarajan, P.: Document image OCR accuracy prediction via latent Dirichlet allocation. In: 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 771–775 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peng, X., Cao, H., Natarajan, P.: Document image quality assessment using discriminative sparse representation. In: 12th IAPR Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS), pp. 227–232 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peng, X., Cao, H., Subramanian, K., Prasad, R., Natarajan, P.: Automated image quality assessment for camera-captured OCR. In: 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2621–2624 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rai, P.K., Maheshwari, S., Gandhi, V.: Document quality estimation using spatial frequency response. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1233–1237 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rai, P.K., Maheshwari, S., Mehta, I., Sakurikar, P., Gandhi, V.: Beyond OCRs for document blur estimation. In: 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), vol. 01, pp. 1101–1107 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Singh, P., Vats, E., Hast, A.: Learning surrogate models of document image quality metrics for automated document image processing. In: 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS), pp. 67–72 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Souza, A., Cheriet, M., Naoi, S., Suen, C.Y.: Automatic filter selection using image quality assessment. In: Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 508–512 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, J., Ye, P., Li, Q., Liu, Y., Doermann, D.: No-reference document image quality assessment based on high order image statistics. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3289–3293 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xu, L., Li, J., Lin, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yan, Y.: Pairwise comparison and rank learning for image quality assessment. Displays 44, 21–26 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ye, P., Doermann, D.: Learning features for predicting OCR accuracy. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012), pp. 3204–3207 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ye, P., Doermann, D.: Document image quality assessment: a brief survey. In: 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pp. 723–727 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zagoruyko, S., Komodakis, N.: Learning to compare image patches via convolutional neural networks. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 4353–4361 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xujun Peng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peng, X., Wang, C. (2020). Camera Captured DIQA with Linearity and Monotonicity Constraints. In: Bai, X., Karatzas, D., Lopresti, D. (eds) Document Analysis Systems. DAS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12116. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57058-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57058-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57057-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57058-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics