Skip to main content

From Automatic Keyword Detection to Ontology-Based Topic Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Document Analysis Systems (DAS 2020)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel, two-staged system, for keyword detection and ontology-driven topic modeling. The first stage specializes in keyword detection in which we introduce a novel graph-based unsupervised approach called Collective Connectivity-Aware Node Weight (CoCoNoW) for detecting keywords from the scientific literature. CoCoNoW builds a connectivity aware graph from a given publication text and eventually assigns weight to the extracted keywords to sort them in order of relevance. The second stage specializes in topic modeling, where a domain ontology serves as an attention-map/context for topic modeling based on the detected keywords. The use of an ontology makes this approach independent of domain and language. CoCoNoW is extensively evaluated on three publicly available datasets Hulth2003, NLM500 and SemEval2010. Analysis of results reveals that CoCoNoW consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches on the respective datasets.

M. Beck, S.T.R. Rizvi—Equal contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://cso.kmi.open.ac.uk, accessed Dec-2019.

  2. 2.

    http://www.lextek.com/manuals/onix/stopwords2.html, accessed Dec 2019.

  3. 3.

    https://cso.kmi.open.ac.uk, accessed Dec-2019.

  4. 4.

    https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos, accessed Dec-2019.

  5. 5.

    https://icdar2019.org/call-for-papers, accessed Dec-2019.

References

  1. Aiello, L.M., et al.: Sensing trending topics in Twitter. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 15(6), 1268–1282 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aronson, A.R., et al.: The NLM indexing initiative. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, p. 17. American Medical Informatics Association (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, H., Naaman, M., Gravano, L.: Beyond trending topics: real world event identification on Twitter. In: AAAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beliga, S.: Keyword extraction: a review of methods and approaches. University of Rijeka, Department of Informatics, pp. 1–9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellaachia, A., Al-Dhelaan, M.: NE-Rank: a novel graph-based keyphrase extraction in Twitter. In: 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol. 1, pp. 372–379. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biswas, S.K., Bordoloi, M., Shreya, J.: A graph based keyword extraction model using collective node weight. Expert Syst. Appl. 97, 51–59 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boudin, F.: Unsupervised keyphrase extraction with multipartite graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08721 (2018)

  8. Breaux, T.D., Reed, J.W.: Using ontology in hierarchical information clustering. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 111b. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carpena, P., Bernaola-Galván, P., Hackenberg, M., Coronado, A., Oliver, J.: Level statistics of words: finding keywords in literary texts and symbolic sequences. Phys. Rev. E 79(3), 035102 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carretero-Campos, C., Bernaola-Galván, P., Coronado, A., Carpena, P.: Improving statistical keyword detection in short texts: entropic and clustering approaches. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 392(6), 1481–1492 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carston, R.: Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese 165(3), 321–345 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9191-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duari, S., Bhatnagar, V.: sCAKE: semantic connectivity aware keyword extraction. Inf. Sci. 477, 100–117 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Florescu, C., Caragea, C.: A position-biased PageRank algorithm for keyphrase extraction. In: Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hulth, A.: Improved automatic keyword extraction given more linguistic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 216–223. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., Mabe, M.: The STM report. Technical report, International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kecskés, I., Horn, L.R.: Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, vol. 1. Walter de Gruyter (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, S.N., Medelyan, O., Kan, M.Y., Baldwin, T.: SemEval-2010 task 5: automatic keyphrase extraction from scientific articles. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 21–26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Phys. Doklady 10, 707 (1966)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Litvak, M., Last, M., Aizenman, H., Gobits, I., Kandel, A.: DegExt - a language-independent graph-based keyphrase extractor. In: Mugellini, E., Szczepaniak, P.S., Pettenati, M.C., Sokhn, M. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering - 3. AINSC, vol. 86, pp. 121–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18029-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, Z., Li, P., Zheng, Y., Sun, M.: Clustering to find exemplar terms for keyphrase extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, vol. 1, pp. 257–266 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lopez, P., Romary, L.: HUMB: automatic key term extraction from scientific articles in GROBID. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 248–251. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mahata, D., Shah, R.R., Kuriakose, J., Zimmermann, R., Talburt, J.R.: Theme-weighted ranking of keywords from text documents using phrase embeddings. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), pp. 184–189. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/tkvap

  23. Mey, J.L.: Whose Language?: A Study in Linguistic Pragmatics, vol. 3. John Benjamins Publishing (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mihalcea, R., Tarau, P.: TextRank: bringing order into text. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR abs/1301.3781 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nikolentzos, G., Meladianos, P., Stavrakas, Y., Vazirgiannis, M.: K-clique-graphs for dense subgraph discovery. In: Ceci, M., Hollmén, J., Todorovski, L., Vens, C., Džeroski, S. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10534, pp. 617–633. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71249-9_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Connor, B., Krieger, M., Ahn, D.: TweetMotif: exploratory search and topic summarization for Twitter. In: AAAI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ohsawa, Y., Benson, N.E., Yachida, M.: KeyGraph: automatic indexing by co-occurrence graph based on building construction metaphor. In: Proceedings IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries (ADL 1998), pp. 12–18. IEEE (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/adl.1998.670375

  29. Osborne, F., Motta, E.: Klink-2: integrating multiple web sources to generate semantic topic networks. In: Arenas, M., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9366, pp. 408–424. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25007-6_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Osborne, F., Motta, E., Mulholland, P.: Exploring scholarly data with rexplore. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8218, pp. 460–477. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41335-3_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford InfoLab (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pay, T., Lucci, S.: Automatic keyword extraction: an ensemble method. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Big Data, Boston, December 2017

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rabby, G., Azad, S., Mahmud, M., Zamli, K.Z., Rahman, M.M.: A flexible keyphrase extraction technique for academic literature. Procedia Comput. Sci. 135, 553–563 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rousseau, F., Vazirgiannis, M.: Main core retention on graph-of-words for single-document keyword extraction. In: Hanbury, A., Kazai, G., Rauber, A., Fuhr, N. (eds.) ECIR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9022, pp. 382–393. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16354-3_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Salatino, A.A., Thanapalasingam, T., Mannocci, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E.: The computer science ontology: a large-scale taxonomy of research areas. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11137, pp. 187–205. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Salatino, A.A., Osborne, F., Thanapalasingam, T., Motta, E.: The CSO classifier: ontology-driven detection of research topics in scholarly articles. In: Doucet, A., Isaac, A., Golub, K., Aalberg, T., Jatowt, A. (eds.) TPDL 2019. LNCS, vol. 11799, pp. 296–311. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30760-8_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Slabbekoorn, K., Noro, T., Tokuda, T.: Ontology-assisted discovery of hierarchical topic clusters on the social web. J. Web Eng. 15(5&6), 361–396 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, R., Liu, W., McDonald, C.: Using word embeddings to enhance keyword identification for scientific publications. In: Sharaf, M.A., Cheema, M.A., Qi, J. (eds.) ADC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9093, pp. 257–268. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19548-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Ware, M., Mabe, M.: The STM report: an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. Technical report, International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Tahseen Raza Rizvi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Beck, M., Rizvi, S.T.R., Dengel, A., Ahmed, S. (2020). From Automatic Keyword Detection to Ontology-Based Topic Modeling. In: Bai, X., Karatzas, D., Lopresti, D. (eds) Document Analysis Systems. DAS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12116. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57058-3_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57058-3_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57057-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57058-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics