Skip to main content

Human-Centered Design of a Dashboard on Students’ Revisions During Writing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education (EC-TEL 2020)

Abstract

Learning dashboards are often used to provide teachers with insight into students’ learning processes. However, simply providing teachers with data on students’ learning processes is not necessarily beneficial for improving learning and teaching; the data need to be actionable. Recently, human-centered learning analytics has been suggested as a solution to realize more effective and actionable dashboards. Accordingly, this study aims to identify how these human-centered approaches could be used to design an interpretable and actionable learning dashboard on students’ writing processes. The design consists of three iterative steps. First, visualizations on students’ revision process, created from keystroke data, were evaluated with writing researchers. Second, the updated visualizations were used to co-design a paper prototype of the dashboard within a focus group session with writing teachers. Finally, the paper prototype was transformed into a digital prototype and evaluated by teachers in individual user test interviews. The results showed that this approach was useful for designing an interpretable dashboard with envisioned actions, which could be further tested in classroom settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barkaoui, K.: What and when second-language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on the computer: the roles of task type second language proficiency, and keyboarding skills. Mod. Lang. J. 100(1), 320–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckingham Shum, S., Ferguson, R., Martinez-Maldonado, R.: Human-centred learning analytics. J. Learn. Analytics 6(2), 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buckingham Shum, S., Knight, S., McNamara, D., Allen, L., Bektik, D., Crossley, S.: Critical perspectives on writing analytics. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 481–483. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charleer, S., Klerkx, J., Duval, E., De Laet, T., Verbert, K.: Creating effective learning analytics dashboards: lessons learnt. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) EC-TEL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9891, pp. 42–56. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Conde, M.A., Hernández-García, A.: Learning analytics for educational decision making. Comput. Hum. Behav. 47, 1–3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/2Fj.chb.2014.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conijn, R., Dux Speltz, E., van Zaanen, M., Van Waes, L., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E.: A process-oriented dataset of revisions during writing. In: Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France, pp. 356–361 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conijn, R., Dux Speltz, E., Zaanen, M.V., Van Waes, L., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E.: A product and process oriented tagset for revisions in writing. PsyArXiv (2020). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h25ak

  8. Dollinger, M., Liu, D., Arthars, N., Lodge, J.: Working together in learning analytics towards the co-creation of value. J. Learn. Analytics 6(2), 10–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzgerald, J.: Research on revision in writing. Rev. Educ. Res. 57(4), 481–506 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Flower, L., Hayes, J.R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., Stratman, J.: Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. Coll. Compos. Commun. 37(1), 16–55 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giacomin, J.: What is human centred design? Des. J. 17(4), 606–623 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-AI complementarity. J. Learn. Analytics 6(2), 27–52 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leijten, M., Van Waes, L.: Keystroke logging in writing research: using inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Commun. 30(3), 358–392 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Likens, A.D., Allen, L.K., McNamara, D.S.: Keystroke dynamics predict essay quality. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2017), pp. 2573–2578. London, UK (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindgren, E., Westum, A., Outakoski, H., Sullivan, K.P.H.: Revising at the leading edge: shaping ideas or clearing up noise. In: Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. (eds.) Observing Writing, pp. 346–365. Brill (2019). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_017

  16. Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., Dawson, S.: Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1439–1459 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinez-Maldonado, R., Echeverria, V., Fernandez Nieto, G., Buckingham Shum, S.: From data to insights: a layered storytelling approach for multimodal learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martinez-Maldonado, R., Pardo, A., Mirriahi, N., Yacef, K., Kay, J., Clayphan, A.: LATUX: an iterative workflow for designing, validating and deploying learning analytics visualisations. J. Learn. Analytics 2(3), 9–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.23.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Olson, J.S., Wang, D., Olson, G.M., Zhang, J.: How people write together now: beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Interact. (TOCHI) 24(1), 1–40 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ranalli, J., Feng, H.H., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E.: Exploring the potential of process-tracing technologies to support assessment for learning of L2 writing. Assessing Writ. 36, 77–89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vandermeulen, N., Leijten, M., Van Waes, L.: Reporting writing process feedback in the classroom: using keystroke logging data to reflect on writing processes. J. Writ. Res. 12(1), 109–140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., Santos, J.L.: Learning analytics dashboard applications. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1500–1509 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Verbert, K., et al.: Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 18(6), 1499–1514 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0751-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wise, A.F., Jung, Y.: Teaching with analytics: towards a situated model of instructional decision-making. J. Learn. Analytics 6(2), 53–69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rianne Conijn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Conijn, R., Van Waes, L., van Zaanen, M. (2020). Human-Centered Design of a Dashboard on Students’ Revisions During Writing. In: Alario-Hoyos, C., Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Scheffel, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Dennerlein, S.M. (eds) Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education. EC-TEL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57716-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57717-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics