Abstract
Learning dashboards are often used to provide teachers with insight into students’ learning processes. However, simply providing teachers with data on students’ learning processes is not necessarily beneficial for improving learning and teaching; the data need to be actionable. Recently, human-centered learning analytics has been suggested as a solution to realize more effective and actionable dashboards. Accordingly, this study aims to identify how these human-centered approaches could be used to design an interpretable and actionable learning dashboard on students’ writing processes. The design consists of three iterative steps. First, visualizations on students’ revision process, created from keystroke data, were evaluated with writing researchers. Second, the updated visualizations were used to co-design a paper prototype of the dashboard within a focus group session with writing teachers. Finally, the paper prototype was transformed into a digital prototype and evaluated by teachers in individual user test interviews. The results showed that this approach was useful for designing an interpretable dashboard with envisioned actions, which could be further tested in classroom settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barkaoui, K.: What and when second-language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on the computer: the roles of task type second language proficiency, and keyboarding skills. Mod. Lang. J. 100(1), 320–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12316
Buckingham Shum, S., Ferguson, R., Martinez-Maldonado, R.: Human-centred learning analytics. J. Learn. Analytics 6(2), 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.1
Buckingham Shum, S., Knight, S., McNamara, D., Allen, L., Bektik, D., Crossley, S.: Critical perspectives on writing analytics. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 481–483. ACM (2016)
Charleer, S., Klerkx, J., Duval, E., De Laet, T., Verbert, K.: Creating effective learning analytics dashboards: lessons learnt. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) EC-TEL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9891, pp. 42–56. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_4
Conde, M.A., Hernández-García, A.: Learning analytics for educational decision making. Comput. Hum. Behav. 47, 1–3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/2Fj.chb.2014.12.034
Conijn, R., Dux Speltz, E., van Zaanen, M., Van Waes, L., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E.: A process-oriented dataset of revisions during writing. In: Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France, pp. 356–361 (2020)
Conijn, R., Dux Speltz, E., Zaanen, M.V., Van Waes, L., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E.: A product and process oriented tagset for revisions in writing. PsyArXiv (2020). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h25ak
Dollinger, M., Liu, D., Arthars, N., Lodge, J.: Working together in learning analytics towards the co-creation of value. J. Learn. Analytics 6(2), 10–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.2
Fitzgerald, J.: Research on revision in writing. Rev. Educ. Res. 57(4), 481–506 (1987)
Flower, L., Hayes, J.R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., Stratman, J.: Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. Coll. Compos. Commun. 37(1), 16–55 (1986)
Giacomin, J.: What is human centred design? Des. J. 17(4), 606–623 (2014)
Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-AI complementarity. J. Learn. Analytics 6(2), 27–52 (2019)
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L.: Keystroke logging in writing research: using inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Commun. 30(3), 358–392 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692
Likens, A.D., Allen, L.K., McNamara, D.S.: Keystroke dynamics predict essay quality. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2017), pp. 2573–2578. London, UK (2017)
Lindgren, E., Westum, A., Outakoski, H., Sullivan, K.P.H.: Revising at the leading edge: shaping ideas or clearing up noise. In: Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. (eds.) Observing Writing, pp. 346–365. Brill (2019). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_017
Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., Dawson, S.: Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1439–1459 (2013)
Martinez-Maldonado, R., Echeverria, V., Fernandez Nieto, G., Buckingham Shum, S.: From data to insights: a layered storytelling approach for multimodal learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2020)
Martinez-Maldonado, R., Pardo, A., Mirriahi, N., Yacef, K., Kay, J., Clayphan, A.: LATUX: an iterative workflow for designing, validating and deploying learning analytics visualisations. J. Learn. Analytics 2(3), 9–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.23.3
Olson, J.S., Wang, D., Olson, G.M., Zhang, J.: How people write together now: beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Interact. (TOCHI) 24(1), 1–40 (2017)
Ranalli, J., Feng, H.H., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E.: Exploring the potential of process-tracing technologies to support assessment for learning of L2 writing. Assessing Writ. 36, 77–89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.007
Vandermeulen, N., Leijten, M., Van Waes, L.: Reporting writing process feedback in the classroom: using keystroke logging data to reflect on writing processes. J. Writ. Res. 12(1), 109–140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.05
Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., Santos, J.L.: Learning analytics dashboard applications. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1500–1509 (2013)
Verbert, K., et al.: Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 18(6), 1499–1514 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0751-2
Wise, A.F., Jung, Y.: Teaching with analytics: towards a situated model of instructional decision-making. J. Learn. Analytics 6(2), 53–69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Conijn, R., Van Waes, L., van Zaanen, M. (2020). Human-Centered Design of a Dashboard on Students’ Revisions During Writing. In: Alario-Hoyos, C., Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Scheffel, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Dennerlein, S.M. (eds) Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education. EC-TEL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57716-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57717-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)