Skip to main content

Generation of New Scalarizing Functions Using Genetic Programming

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XVI (PPSN 2020)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) with a selection mechanism different from Pareto dominance. This interest has been mainly motivated by the poor performance of Pareto-based selection mechanisms when dealing with problems having more than three objectives (the so-called many-objective optimization problems). Two viable alternatives for solving many-objective optimization problems are decomposition-based and indicator-based MOEAs. However, it is well-known that the performance of decomposition-based MOEAs (and also of indicator-based MOEAs designed around R2) heavily relies on the scalarizing function adopted. In this paper, we propose an approach for generating novel scalarizing functions using genetic programming. Using our proposed approach, we were able to generate two new scalarizing functions (called AGSF1 and AGSF2), which were validated using an indicator-based MOEA designed around R2 (MOMBI-II). This validation was conducted using a set of standard test problems and two performance indicators (hypervolume and s-energy). Our results indicate that AGSF1 has a similar performance to that obtained when using the well-known Achievement Scalarizing Function (ASF). However, AGSF2 provided a better performance than ASF in most of the test problems adopted. Nevertheless, our most remarkable finding is that genetic programming can indeed generate novel (and possible more competitive) scalarizing functions.

The first author acknowledges support from CONACyT and CINVESTAV-IPN to pursue graduate studies in Computer Science. The second author gratefully acknowledges support from CONACyT grant no. 2016-01-1920 (Investigación en Fronteras de la Ciencia 2016) and from a SEP-Cinvestav grant (application no. 4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source code for ELGP is available at: https://github.com/lacava/ellen.

  2. 2.

    The source code of MOMBI-II is available at:

    https://www.cs.cinvestav.mx/~EVOCINV/software/MOMBI-II/MOMBI-II.html.

  3. 3.

    The source code of our approach is available at:

    http://www.computacion.cs.cinvestav.mx/~abernabe/scalarizing_functions.

References

  1. Banzhaf, W., Francone, F.D., Keller, R.E., Nordin, P.: Genetic Programming: An Introduction on the Automatic Evolution of Computer Programs and Its Applications. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Brockhoff, D., Wagner, T., Trautmann, H.: On the properties of the \(R2\) indicator. In: 2012 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO2012), pp. 465–472. ACM Press (2012). ISBN: 978-1-4503-1177-9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coello Coello, C.A.: A comprehensive survey of evolutionary-based multiobjective optimization techniques. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 1(3), 269–308 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multiobjective optimization.In: Abraham, A., Jain, L., Goldberg, R. (eds.) Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Theoretical Advances and Applications, pp. 105–145. Springer, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hardin, D.P., Saff, E.B.: Minimal Riesz energy point configurations for rectifiable \(d\)-dimensional manifolds. Adv. Math. 193(1), 174–204 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernández Gómez, R.: Parallel Hyper-Heuristics for Multi-Objective Optimization. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, CINVESTAV-IPN, Mexico City, México (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hernández Gómez, R., Coello Coello, C.A.: Improved metaheuristic based on the \(R2\) indicator for many-objective optimization. In: 2015 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO). pp. 679–686. ACM Press (2015), ISBN 978-1-4503-3472-3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L., While, L.: A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10(5), 477–506 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, H., Deb, K.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point based nondominated sorting approach, part ii: handling constraints and extending to an adaptive approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 602–622 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koza, J.R.: Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection. Stat. Comput. 4(2), 87–112 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. La Cava, W., Helmuth, T., Spector, L., Danai, K.: Genetic programming with epigenetic local search. In: 2015 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO). pp. 1055–1062. ACM Press (2015), ISBN 978-1-4503-3472-3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pescador-Rojas, M., Hernández Gómez, R., Montero, E., Rojas-Morales, N., Riff, M.-C., Coello Coello, C.A.: An overview of weighted and unconstrained scalarizing functions. In: Trautmann, H., et al. (eds.) EMO 2017. LNCS, vol. 10173, pp. 499–513. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54157-0_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Trivedi, A., Srinivasan, D., Sanyal, K., Ghosh, A.: A survey of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 21(3), 440–462 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, A., Qu, B.Y., Li, H., Zhao, S.Z., Suganthan, P.N., Zhang, Q.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm Evol. Comput. 1(1), 32–49 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zitzler, E., Brockhoff, D., Thiele, L.: The hypervolume indicator revisited: on the design of pareto-compliant indicators via weighted integration. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 862–876. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70928-2_64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amín V. Bernabé Rodríguez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bernabé Rodríguez, A.V., Coello Coello, C.A. (2020). Generation of New Scalarizing Functions Using Genetic Programming. In: Bäck, T., et al. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XVI. PPSN 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12270. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58115-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58115-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58114-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58115-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics