Skip to main content

SODA: Story Oriented Dense Video Captioning Evaluation Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Vision – ECCV 2020 (ECCV 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 12351))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Dense Video Captioning (DVC) is a challenging task that localizes all events in a short video and describes them with natural language sentences. The main goal of DVC is video story description, that is, to generate a concise video story that supports human video comprehension without watching it. In recent years, DVC has attracted increasing attention in the vision and language research community, and has been employed as a task of the workshop, ActivityNet Challenge. In the current research community, the official scorer provided by ActivityNet Challenge is the de-facto standard evaluation framework for DVC systems. It computes averaged METEOR scores for matched pairs between generated and reference captions whose Intersection over Union (IoU) exceeds a specific threshold value. However, the current framework does not take into account the story of the video or the ordering of captions. It also tends to give high scores to systems that generate several hundred redundant captions, that humans cannot read. This paper proposes a new evaluation framework, Story Oriented Dense video cAptioning evaluation framework (SODA), for measuring the performance of video story description systems. SODA first tries to find temporally optimal matching between generated and reference captions to capture the story of a video. Then, it computes METEOR scores for the matching and derives F-measure scores from the METEOR scores to penalize redundant captions. To demonstrate that SODA gives low scores for inadequate captions in terms of video story description, we evaluate two state-of-the-art systems with it, varying the number of captions. The results show that SODA gives low scores against too many or too few captions and high scores against captions whose number equals to that of a reference, while the current framework gives good scores for all the cases. Furthermore, we show that SODA tends to give lower scores than the current evaluation framework in evaluating captions in the incorrect order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://activity-net.org/.

  2. 2.

    In this paper, we follow the concept in [3] that the correct order of captions represents a story.

  3. 3.

    Using the VideoStory dataset [3] would have been more effective as it was constructed to evaluate video story description systems. However, unfortunately, it has not been publicly available.

  4. 4.

    The test data is only available on the ActivityNet evaluation server.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/salesforce/densecap.

  6. 6.

    m is a parameter for controlling the number of captions in the experiments.

  7. 7.

    We utilized the official scorer provided by ActivityNet Challenge. The code is available at https://github.com/ranjaykrishna/densevid_eval. We used the revised version from November 2017 that fixed an overestimation bug; the number of pairs (the denominator in Equation (3)) was not counted correctly.

  8. 8.

    Self-BLEU has been used to assess the diversity of a set of generated sentences in text generation tasks. A lower score indicates a higher diversity.

  9. 9.

    In order to prevent Shuffle from being the same as Swap, we employed only captions with reverse ordering of the gold standard as Shuffle in the human judgment.

References

  1. Anderson, P., Fernando, B., Johnson, M., Gould, S.: SPICE: semantic propositional image caption evaluation. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) ECCV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9909, pp. 382–398. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46454-1_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee, S., Lavie, A.: METEOR: an automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pp. 65–72 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gella, S., Lewis, M., Rohrbach, M.: A dataset for telling the stories of social media videos. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 968–974 (2018). https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1117.pdf

  4. Johnson, J., Karpathy, A., Fei-Fei, L.: Densecap: fully convolutional localization networks for dense captioning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kilickaya, M., Erdem, A., Ikizler-Cinbis, N., Erdem, E.: Re-evaluating automatic metrics for image captioning. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers, pp. 199–209. Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain, April 2017. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E17-1019

  6. Krishna, R., Hata, K., Ren, F., Fei-Fei, L., Carlos Niebles, J.: Dense-captioning events in videos. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 706–715 (2017). http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_ICCV_2017/papers/Krishna_Dense-Captioning_Events_in_ICCV_2017_paper.pdf

  7. Kusner, M., Sun, Y., Kolkin, N., Weinberger, K.: From word embeddings to document distances. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 957–966 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, Y., Yao, T., Pan, Y., Chao, H., Mei, T.: Jointly localizing and describing events for dense video captioning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7492–7500 (2018). http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2018/papers/Li_Jointly_Localizing_and_CVPR_2018_paper.pdf

  9. Lin, C.Y.: ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Text Summarization Branches Out, pp. 74–81. Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, July 2004. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W04-1013

  10. Mun, J., Yang, L., Ren, Z., Xu, N., Han, B.: Streamlined dense video captioning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6588–6597 (2019). http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_CVPR_2019/papers/Mun_Streamlined_Dense_Video_Captioning_CVPR_2019_paper.pdf

  11. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 311–318 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Regneri, M., Rohrbach, M., Wetzel, D., Thater, S., Schiele, B., Pinkal, M.: Grounding action descriptions in videos. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 1, 25–36 (2013). https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/Q13-1003.pdf

  13. Rohrbach, A., Rohrbach, M., Qiu, W., Friedrich, A., Pinkal, M., Schiele, B.: Coherent multi-sentence video description with variable level of detail. In: Jiang, X., Hornegger, J., Koch, R. (eds.) GCPR 2014. LNCS, vol. 8753, pp. 184–195. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11752-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5998–6008 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vedantam, R., Zitnick, C.L., Parikh, D.: Cider: consensus-based image description evaluation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4566–4575 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vinyals, O., Fortunato, M., Jaitly, N.: Pointer networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2692–2700 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, J., Jiang, W., Ma, L., Liu, W., Xu, Y.: Bidirectional attentive fusion with context gating for dense video captioning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7190–7198 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, J., Gaizauskas, R.: Cross-validating image description datasets and evaluation metrics. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), pp. 3059–3066. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Portorož, Slovenia, May 2016. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L16-1489

  19. Zhou, L., Xu, C., Corso, J.J.: Towards automatic learning of procedures from web instructional videos. In: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2018). https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/17344/16367

  20. Zhou, L., Zhou, Y., Corso, J.J., Socher, R., Xiong, C.: End-to-end dense video captioning with masked transformer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8739–8748 (2018). http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2018/papers/Zhou_End-to-End_Dense_Video_CVPR_2018_paper.pdf

  21. Zhu, Y., et al.: Texygen: a benchmarking platform for text generation models. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 18: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1097–1100 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soichiro Fujita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 150 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fujita, S., Hirao, T., Kamigaito, H., Okumura, M., Nagata, M. (2020). SODA: Story Oriented Dense Video Captioning Evaluation Framework. In: Vedaldi, A., Bischof, H., Brox, T., Frahm, JM. (eds) Computer Vision – ECCV 2020. ECCV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12351. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58539-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58539-6_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58538-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58539-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics