Skip to main content

What Are MOOCs Learners’ Concerns? Text Analysis of Reviews for Computer Science Courses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2020 International Workshops (DASFAA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12115))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In MOOCs, course reviews are valuable sources for exploiting learners’ attitudes towards the courses provided. This study employed an innovative structural topic modeling technique to analyze 1920 reviews of 339 courses regarding computer science to understand what primary concerns the learners had. Nine major topics, including course levels, learning perception, course assessment, teaching styles, problem solving, course content, course organization, critique, and learning tools and platforms were revealed. In addition, we investigated how the identified nine topics varied across reviews with different ratings. Results indicated that negative reviews tended to relate more to issues such as course assessment, learning tools and platforms, and critique, while positive reviews concerned more about issues such as course levels, course organization, and learning perception. This study provided tutors with novel implications for developing online courses, particularly computer science courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.class-central.com/.

References

  1. Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., Gannaway, D.: Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Comput. Educ. 129, 48–60 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner, J., Brooks, C.: Student success prediction in MOOCs. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 28, 127–203 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu, M., Sari, A., Lee, M.M.: A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016). Internet High. Educ. 37, 31–39 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah, D.: By the numbers: MOOCs in 2018 [Web log post] (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henderikx, M.A., Kreijns, K., Kalz, M.: Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap. Dist. Educ. 38, 353–368 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun, J.C.-Y., Kuo, C.-Y., Hou, H.-T., Lin, Y.-Y.: Exploring learners’ sequential behavioral patterns, flow experience, and learning performance in an anti-phishing educational game. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20, 45–60 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tang, J.K.T., Xie, H., Wong, T.L.: A big data framework for early identification of dropout students in MOOC. In: Lam, J., Ng, K.K., Cheung, S.K.S., Wong, T.L., Li, K.C., Wang, F.L. (eds.) ICTE 2015. CCIS, vol. 559, pp. 127–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48978-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiu, T.K., Hew, T.K.: Factors influencing peer learning and performance in MOOC asynchronous online discussion forum. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 34, 16–28 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, X., Yang, D., Wen, M., Koedinger, K., Rosé, C.P.: Investigating how student’s cognitive behavior in MOOC discussion forums affect learning gains. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, S., Peng, X., Cheng, H.N., Liu, Z., Sun, J., Yang, C.: Unfolding sentimental and behavioral tendencies of learners’ concerned topics from course reviews in a MOOC. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 57, 670–696 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hew, K.F.: Promoting engagement in online courses: what strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47, 320–341 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, L., Ye, S., Pearce, P.L., Wu, M.-Y.: Refreshing hotel satisfaction studies by reconfiguring customer review data. Int. J. Hospital. Manag. 38, 1–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mankad, S., Han, H.S., Goh, J., Gavirneni, S.: Understanding online hotel reviews through automated text analysis. Serv. Sci. 8, 124–138 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Xie, H.: Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: a retrospective of all volumes of computer & education. Comput. Educ. 151, 103855 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, X., Yu, G., Cheng, G., Hao, T.: Research topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the top-ranked journal on educational technology over the past 40 years: a bibliometric analysis. J. Comput. Educ. 6, 563–585 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, X., Xie, H., Wang, F.L., Liu, Z., Xu, J., Hao, T.: A bibliometric analysis of natural language processing in medical research. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 18, 14 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hao, T., Chen, X., Li, G., Yan, J.: A bibliometric analysis of text mining in medical research. Soft. Comput. 22, 7875–7892 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H.: Fifty years of British Journal of Educational Technology: a topic modeling based bibliometric perspective. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 51, 692–708 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xie, H., Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Wang, C.-C.: Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: a systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Comput. Educ. 140, 103599 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D.: stm: R package for structural topic models. J. Stat. Softw. 10, 1–40 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, M.E., et al.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58, 1064–1082 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stratton, C., Grace, R.: Exploring linguistic diversity of MOOCs: implications for international development. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 53, 1–10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kashyap, A., Nayak, A.: Different machine learning models to predict dropouts in MOOCs. In: 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), pp. 80–85. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hu, N., Zhang, T., Gao, B., Bose, I.: What do hotel customers complain about? Text analysis using structural topic model. Tour. Manage. 72, 417–426 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zou, D., Xie, H.: Personalized word-learning based on technique feature analysis and learning analytics. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 21, 233–244 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research received grants from the Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (EDB(LE)/P&R/EL/175/2), the Education Bureau of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Internal Research Grant (RG93/2018-2019R), and the Internal Research Fund (RG 1/2019-2020R) of the Education University of Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Zou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G. (2020). What Are MOOCs Learners’ Concerns? Text Analysis of Reviews for Computer Science Courses. In: Nah, Y., Kim, C., Kim, SY., Moon, YS., Whang, S.E. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2020 International Workshops. DASFAA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12115. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59413-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59413-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59412-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59413-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics