Skip to main content

Can a Robot Be a Moral Agent?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence (RCAI 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12412))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1070 Accesses

Abstract

Issues of the ethically aligned design of intelligent/autonomous systems have now moved into the fields of normative and technical regulation. If a system must make ethically determined decisions, then it must be recognized as a moral agent. This paper provides a list of the properties of a moral agent and shows not only that an artificial agent can have such properties, but also that they are technically determined as manifestations of adaptive mechanisms. In particular, it is shown that mechanisms such as the presence of the “I” component in the sign-oriented picture of the agent’s world, the presence of an emotional-needs architecture, and the mechanism for comparing the observed conspecific with the “I” make it possible to realize the phenomena of social learning and a property such as empathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. UNESCO, “Report of COMEST on Robotics Ethics.” UNESCO, COMEST, Paris, p. 64 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parthemore, J., Whitby, B.: What makes any agent a moral agent? Reflections on machine consciousness and moral agency. Int. J. Mach. Conscious. 05(2), 105–129 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayo, B.: The moral agent, in Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, pp. 47–63 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Waal, F.: The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism Among the Primates. W W Norton & Co, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neu, J.: An Ethics of Emotion? Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callahan, S.: The role of emotion in ethical decision making. Hastings Cent. Rep. 18(3), 9 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Connelly, J.E.: Emotions and the process of ethical decision-making. J. South Carolina Med. Assoc. 86(12), 621–623 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Minsky, M.: The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and The Future of the Human Mind. Simon & Schuster, New York City (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karpov, V.E.: Emotions and temperament of Robots: Behavioral Aspects, Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, ISSN 1064-2307, Original Russian Text © V.E. Karpov, 2014, published in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Teoriya i Sistemy Upravleniya, 2014, No. 5, pp. 126–145., vol. 53, no. 5. Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., pp. 743–760, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karpov, V.: Robot’s temperament. Biol. Inspired Cogn. Archit. 7, 76–86 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simonov, V.P.: Thwarted action and need – informational theories of emotions. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 5(2), 103–107 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ilyin, E.P.: Emotions and Feelings. Piter, Saint-Petersburg (2001). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rai, M., Yadav, R.K., Husain, A.A., Maity, T., Yadav, D.K.: Extraction of facial features for detection of human emotions under noisy condition, no. September, pp. 49–62 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osipov, G.S., Panov, A.I., Chudova, N.V., Kuznecova, J.M.: Znakovaja kartina mira sub’ekta povedenija (Semiotic view of world for behavior subject). Fizmatlit, Moscow (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, E.O.: Genesis: The Deep Origin of Societies (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panov, E.: Evolution of dialogue. Communication in development: From microorganisms to humans. Moscow (2014). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Darwall, S.: The foundations of morality: virtue, law, and obligation. In: Rutherford, D. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, pp. 221–249. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, A.A.: The Theory of Moral Santiments, 6th ed. MetaLibri (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Apresyan, R.G., Artemyeva, O.V., Prokofiev, A.V.: The phenomenon of moral imperative. Critical essays. Institute of Philosophy, RAS, Moscow (2018). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Drobnitsky, O.: The concept of morality. Historical and critical essay. Science, Moscow (2007). (in Russisn)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the RFBR grant 17-29-07083-ofi_m.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valery E. Karpov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karpov, V.E. (2020). Can a Robot Be a Moral Agent?. In: Kuznetsov, S.O., Panov, A.I., Yakovlev, K.S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence. RCAI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12412. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59535-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59535-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59534-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59535-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics