Skip to main content

Quality Control Method for Peer Assessment System Based on Multi-dimensional Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web Information Systems and Applications (WISA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12432))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In recent years, online learning has received widespread attention, and has played an important role in recent years. As a new application field of crowdsourcing system, peer assessment can solve student’s performance evaluation problem in massive online courses. Traditional crowdsourcing quality control algorithm has not been able to use effective information to the evaluation of workers. Aiming at this problem, a quality control algorithm based on multi-dimensional information is proposed. The user’s behavior, comment text information and other useful elements are combined together. The feature vectors of reliability are extracted from a variety of information based on the frame of log-linear model. And then, the gradient descent algorithm model is used to study the optimal parameters. The experimental results show that when comparing with the traditional Expectation Maximization algorithm, our multi-dimensional quality control algorithm has better performance in the accuracy and mean square error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kulkarni, C., et al.: Peer and self-assessment in massive online classes. Des. Think. Res. 20(6), 1–31 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, Z., et al.: Crowdsourcing quality control strategy and evaluation algorithm. Chin. J. Comput. 8, 1636–1649 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shah, N.B., Bradley, J.K., et al.: A case for ordinal peer-evaluation in MOOCs. In: NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education, pp. 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daniel, J.: Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J. Interact. Media Educ. 2012(3), 3–12 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zelinski, M., Hicks, N.M., et al.: Instructor outcomes of teaching a STEM MOOC. In: IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference 2017, Indianapolis, IN, USA, vol. 1, pp. 1–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, K., et al.: The evolution path and future prospect of research on crowdsourcing in China and abroad. Sci. Technol. Prog. Policy 8, 154–160 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng, Z., et al.: Crowdsourcing quality evaluation algorithm based on sliding task window. Mini-micro Syst. 9, 2125–2129 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Felsenthal, D.S., et al.: The treaty of nice and qualified majority voting. Soc. Choice Welf. 18(3), 431–464 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Moon, T.K.: The expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Sig. Process. Mag. 13(6), 47–60 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Z., et al.: Research on quality control of peer grading in MOOCs. Softw. Eng. 2, 7–10 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, J., Yang, X., Wang, B.: Crowdsourced indoor localization for diverse devices with RSSI sequences. In: Ni, W., Wang, X., Song, W., Li, Y. (eds.) WISA 2019. LNCS, vol. 11817, pp. 614–625. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30952-7_62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ding, Y., et al.: Research on crowdsourcing quality control algorithm based on social platform. Softw. Guide 12, 90–93 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, B., et al.: Application of log-linear model in part-of-speech tagging. Comput. Sci. 35(5), 163–166 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen, R.: Log-linear models and logistic regression, pp. 267–268. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bengio, Y., et al.: A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(6), 1137–1155 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kesorn, K., et al.: An enhanced bag-of-visual word vector space model to represent visual content in athletics images. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 14(1), 211–222 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant N181604015, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61602106.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengyun Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, P., Yin, Z., Li, F. (2020). Quality Control Method for Peer Assessment System Based on Multi-dimensional Information. In: Wang, G., Lin, X., Hendler, J., Song, W., Xu, Z., Liu, G. (eds) Web Information Systems and Applications. WISA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12432. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60029-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60029-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60028-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60029-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics