Abstract
Keyboard input is the mainstream input method on smartphones, and the keyboard design plays an important role in input experience. Previous studies mainly measured descriptive variables through inputting phrases to evaluate the usability of keyboard design. However, the development of screen technology brings about more precise and attributional data that could in-depth explore and assess the details of keyboard design. This study adopted a single factor (Phone screen size: Small, 5-in. vs. Large, 6.5-in.) within-subject design through inputting English character pairs to build up the usability evaluation structural equation model. Traditional measurements and new attributional measurements, including Point Pressure, Point Interval Response Time, and Point Duration, were taken as modeling indicators. The results showed that Word Per Minute was not fitted to evaluate keyboard designs with other indicators in both screen sizes, and new attributional measurements could replace this indicator. For the large-screen smartphone, the well-fitted model consists of three factors, including Input Speed (Point Duration and Point Interval Response Time), Objective Experience (Point Pressure and Word Error Rate), and Subjective Feedback. For the small-screen smartphone, the well-fitted model consists of two factors, including Efficiency (Point Interval Response Time, Word Error Rate, and Point Duration) and Subjective Feedback. These findings provide an effective approach to evaluate the usability of keyboard design for future studies, thus enlightening the keyboard optimization method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lee, S., Zhai, S.: The performance of touch screen soft buttons. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, Boston, pp. 309–318. ACM (2009)
Smith, B.A., Bi, X., Zhai, S.: Optimizing touchscreen keyboards for gesture typing. In: 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, pp. 3365–3374, ACM, New York (2015)
Sougou Inc. https://corp.sogou.com/newscontent?id=291. Accessed 14 June 2020
Zhai, S., Kristensson, P.O.: The word-gesture keyboard: reimagining keyboard interaction. Commun. ACM 55(9), 47–52 (2012)
Microsoft Garage. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/garage/profiles/word-flow-keyboard/. Accessed 14 June 2020
Chachris, E.A., Sirinya, V., Lucy, R.: Musculoskeletal disorder and pain associated with smartphone use: a systematic review of biomechanical evidence. J. Hong Kong Physiother. J. 38(2), 77–90 (2018)
Chang, J., Choi, B., Tjolleng, A., Jung, K.: Effects of button position on a soft keyboard: muscle activity, touch time, and discomfort in two-thumb text entry. Appl. Ergon. 60, 282–292 (2017)
Gehrmann, S.V., Tang, J., Li, Z.M., Goitz, R.J., Windolf, J., Kaufmann, R.A.: Motion deficit of the thumb in CMC joint arthritis. J. Hand Surg. 35(9), 1449–1453 (2010)
Kim, G., Ahn, C.S., Jeon, H.W., Lee, C.R.: Effects of the use of smartphones on pain and muscle fatigue in the upper extremity. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24(12), 1255–1258 (2012)
Girouard, A., Lo, J., Riyadh, M., Daliri, F., Eady, A.K., Pasquero, J.: One-handed bend interactions with deformable smartphones. In: 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, Seoul, pp. 1509–1518. ACM (2015)
Lee, M., Hong, Y., Lee, S., Won, J., Yang, J., Park, S.: The effects of smartphone use on upper extremity muscle activity and pain threshold. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 27(6), 1743–1745 (2015)
Bi, X., Zhai, S.: IJQwerty: what difference does one key change make? Gesture typing keyboard optimization bounded by one key position change from Qwerty. In: 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, San Jose, pp. 49–58. ACM (2016)
Bi, X., Smith, B.A., Zhai, S.: Quasi-qwerty soft keyboard optimization. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, Atlanta, pp. 283–286. ACM (2010)
MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W.: Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 754–755. ACM, New York (2003)
Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S.: Testing Structural Equation Models, 1st edn. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park (1993)
Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th edn. Guilford Press, New York (2015)
Android Developer. https://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/MotionEvent.html#getPressure%28%29. Accessed 14 June 2020
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. North-Holland, Oxford
Borg, G.: Principles in scaling pain and the Borg CR Scales®. Psychologica 37, 35–47 (2004)
Turner, C.J., Chaparro, B.S., He, J.: Text input on a smartwatch qwerty keyboard: tap vs. trace. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 33(2), 143–150 (2017)
Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013)
Wen, Z., Hou, J., Herbert, M.: Structural equation model testing: cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and Chi-square test. Acta Psychologica Sinica 36(2), 186–194 (2004)
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (Ergonomic design of curved keyboard on smart devices).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, Y., Huo, J., Huang, Y., Wang, K., Wu, D., He, J. (2020). Usability Evaluation of Smartphone Keyboard Design from an Approach of Structural Equation Model. In: Stephanidis, C., Kurosu, M., Degen, H., Reinerman-Jones, L. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: Multimodality and Intelligence. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12424. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60117-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60117-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60116-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60117-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)