Skip to main content

Usability Evaluation of Smartphone Keyboard Design from an Approach of Structural Equation Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: Multimodality and Intelligence (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12424))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1490 Accesses

Abstract

Keyboard input is the mainstream input method on smartphones, and the keyboard design plays an important role in input experience. Previous studies mainly measured descriptive variables through inputting phrases to evaluate the usability of keyboard design. However, the development of screen technology brings about more precise and attributional data that could in-depth explore and assess the details of keyboard design. This study adopted a single factor (Phone screen size: Small, 5-in. vs. Large, 6.5-in.) within-subject design through inputting English character pairs to build up the usability evaluation structural equation model. Traditional measurements and new attributional measurements, including Point Pressure, Point Interval Response Time, and Point Duration, were taken as modeling indicators. The results showed that Word Per Minute was not fitted to evaluate keyboard designs with other indicators in both screen sizes, and new attributional measurements could replace this indicator. For the large-screen smartphone, the well-fitted model consists of three factors, including Input Speed (Point Duration and Point Interval Response Time), Objective Experience (Point Pressure and Word Error Rate), and Subjective Feedback. For the small-screen smartphone, the well-fitted model consists of two factors, including Efficiency (Point Interval Response Time, Word Error Rate, and Point Duration) and Subjective Feedback. These findings provide an effective approach to evaluate the usability of keyboard design for future studies, thus enlightening the keyboard optimization method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee, S., Zhai, S.: The performance of touch screen soft buttons. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, Boston, pp. 309–318. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, B.A., Bi, X., Zhai, S.: Optimizing touchscreen keyboards for gesture typing. In: 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, pp. 3365–3374, ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sougou Inc. https://corp.sogou.com/newscontent?id=291. Accessed 14 June 2020

  4. Zhai, S., Kristensson, P.O.: The word-gesture keyboard: reimagining keyboard interaction. Commun. ACM 55(9), 47–52 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Microsoft Garage. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/garage/profiles/word-flow-keyboard/. Accessed 14 June 2020

  6. Chachris, E.A., Sirinya, V., Lucy, R.: Musculoskeletal disorder and pain associated with smartphone use: a systematic review of biomechanical evidence. J. Hong Kong Physiother. J. 38(2), 77–90 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang, J., Choi, B., Tjolleng, A., Jung, K.: Effects of button position on a soft keyboard: muscle activity, touch time, and discomfort in two-thumb text entry. Appl. Ergon. 60, 282–292 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gehrmann, S.V., Tang, J., Li, Z.M., Goitz, R.J., Windolf, J., Kaufmann, R.A.: Motion deficit of the thumb in CMC joint arthritis. J. Hand Surg. 35(9), 1449–1453 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, G., Ahn, C.S., Jeon, H.W., Lee, C.R.: Effects of the use of smartphones on pain and muscle fatigue in the upper extremity. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24(12), 1255–1258 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Girouard, A., Lo, J., Riyadh, M., Daliri, F., Eady, A.K., Pasquero, J.: One-handed bend interactions with deformable smartphones. In: 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, Seoul, pp. 1509–1518. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, M., Hong, Y., Lee, S., Won, J., Yang, J., Park, S.: The effects of smartphone use on upper extremity muscle activity and pain threshold. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 27(6), 1743–1745 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bi, X., Zhai, S.: IJQwerty: what difference does one key change make? Gesture typing keyboard optimization bounded by one key position change from Qwerty. In: 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, San Jose, pp. 49–58. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bi, X., Smith, B.A., Zhai, S.: Quasi-qwerty soft keyboard optimization. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems on Proceedings, Atlanta, pp. 283–286. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W.: Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 754–755. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S.: Testing Structural Equation Models, 1st edn. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th edn. Guilford Press, New York (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Android Developer. https://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/MotionEvent.html#getPressure%28%29. Accessed 14 June 2020

  18. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. North-Holland, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borg, G.: Principles in scaling pain and the Borg CR Scales®. Psychologica 37, 35–47 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turner, C.J., Chaparro, B.S., He, J.: Text input on a smartwatch qwerty keyboard: tap vs. trace. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 33(2), 143–150 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wen, Z., Hou, J., Herbert, M.: Structural equation model testing: cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and Chi-square test. Acta Psychologica Sinica 36(2), 186–194 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (Ergonomic design of curved keyboard on smart devices).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jibo He .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Huo, J., Huang, Y., Wang, K., Wu, D., He, J. (2020). Usability Evaluation of Smartphone Keyboard Design from an Approach of Structural Equation Model. In: Stephanidis, C., Kurosu, M., Degen, H., Reinerman-Jones, L. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: Multimodality and Intelligence. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12424. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60117-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60117-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60116-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60117-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics