Skip to main content

A Practice-Based Artificial Society Approach to Exploring the Evolution of Trust

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 3324 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12427))

Abstract

Blockchain systems promise to fundamentally transform the way users interact with systems of governance, finance, and administration. Since relevant changes are expected to appear on a global scale, considerable methodological challenges exist regarding the sound description and adequate design-theoretic conceptualisation of respective social transformations. Artificial societies are a proven method for exploring the dynamics of large scale social systems which are otherwise hard to observe. They allow for precise modelling of social processes, facilitating an experimental attitude towards large scale systems which otherwise remain inaccessible to researchers. Within this paper, we describe how artificial societies can be employed as part of a practice-based research strategy aimed at elucidating a large scale transformation of this kind: the role of trust within social practices facilitated by Blockchain technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andreessen, M.: Why Bitcoin Matters. New York Times, 21 Jan 2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batty, M.: A digital breeder for designing cities. Archit. Des. 79(4), 46–49 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, A., Heidt, M., Eibl, M.: Conduplicated symmetries: renegotiating the material basis of prototype research. In: Chakrabarti, A. (ed.) ICoRD 2015 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 1. SIST, vol. 34, pp. 71–78. Springer, New Delhi (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2232-3_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bleecker, J.: Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory 29, (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blythe, M.: Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2014. ACM, New York, pp. 703–712 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borning, A., Muller, M.: Next steps for value sensitive design. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2012, p. 1125 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buterin, V.: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White Paper (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cetina, K.K., Schatzki, T.R., von Savigny, E.: The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Routledge, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cordella, A., and Shaikh, M.: Actor-network theory and after: what’s new for is research.Iin: European Conference on Information Systems 2003, Naples, Italy, June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dannen, C.: Introducing Ethereum and Solidity. Springer, Berlin (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2535-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunne, A., Raby, F.: Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elsden, C., Manohar, A., Briggs, J., Harding, M., Speed, C., Vines, J.: Making sense of blockchain applications: a typology for HCI. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, pp. 458:1–458:14. ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R.: Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Filatova, T., Parker, D., Van der Veen, A.: Agent-based urban land markets: agent’s pricing behavior, land prices and urban land use change. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 12(1), 3 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fuchsberger, V. Generational divides in terms of actor-network theory: potential crises and the potential of crises. In: Online Proceedings of the 7th Media in Transition Conference. MIT, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M.: Human-computer non-interaction: the activity of non-use. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS Companion 2014, pp. 57–60. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbert, N., Conte, R.: Artificial Societies: the Computer Simulation of Social Life. Routledge, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5, 3 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heidt, M.: Examining interdisciplinary prototyping in the context of cultural communication. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Heidt, M., Berger, A., Bischof, A.: Blockchain and trust: a practice-based inquiry. In: Nah, F.F.-H., Siau, K. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11588, pp. 148–158. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22335-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Heidt, M., Kanellopoulos, K., Pfeiffer, L., Rosenthal, P.: Diverse ecologies – interdisciplinary development for cultural education. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 539–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40498-6_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Heidt, M., Wuttke, M., Ohler, P., Rosenthal, P.: Scaffolding a methodology for situating cognitive technology within everyday contexts. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2016. LNCS, Part I, vol. 9746, pp. 281–292. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Hofmann, S.: Simulation einer sozialen Praxis. In: Dynamik sozialer Praktiken: Simulation gemeinsamer Unternehmungen von Frauengruppen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 71–140 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Holmes, A.: Reconciling Experimentum and Experientia: Ontology for Reflective Practice Research in New Media

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holtz, G.: Generating Social Practices. J. Artif. Soci. Soc. Simul. 17(1), 17 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Initiative, I.G.: Ethically Aligned Design. Technical report. The IEEE Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Latour, B.: On interobjectivity. Mind Cult. Act. 3(4), 228–245 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Latour, B., Hermant, E., Shannon, S.: Paris Ville Invisible. La Découverte Paris (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luhmann, N.: Trust and Power. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lustick, I.S.: Agent-based modelling of collective identity: Testing constructivist theory. J. Artif. Soci. Soc. Simul. 3(1), 1 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mäkelä, M.: Knowing through making: the role of the artefact in practice-led research. Knowl. Technol. Policy 20(3), 157–163 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Markey-Towler, B.: Anarchy, Blockchain and Utopia: A Theory of Political-Socioeconomic Systems Organised using Blockchain

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rahwan, I.: Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract. Ethics Inf. Technol. 20(1), 5–14 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reckwitz, A.: Toward a theory of social practices a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5(2), 243–263 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Røpke, I.: Theories of practice—new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecol. Econ. 68(10), 2490–2497 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sawyer, R.K.: Artificial societies: multiagent systems and the micro-macro link in sociological theory. Sociol. Methods Res. 31(3), 325–363 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Schatzki, T.R.: The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Penn State Press, University Park (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Scrivener, S. Reflection in and on action and practice in creative-production doctoral projects in art and design. Working Papers in art and design, vol. 1 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Scrivener, S., Chapman, P.: The practical implications of applying a theory of practice based research: A case study. Working papers in art and design, vol. 3 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shove, E., Pantzar, M.: Consumers, producers and practices understanding the invention and reinvention of nordic walking. J. Consum. Cult. 5(1), 43–64 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R.: Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3), 387–420 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Steenson, M.W.: Architectures of Information: Christopher Alexander, Cedric Price, and Nicholas Negroponte and MIT’s Architecture Machine Group. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sterling, B.: Design fiction. Interactions 16(3), 20–24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Strum, S.S., Latour, B.: Redefining the social link: from baboons to humans. Soci. Sci. Inf. 26(4), 783–802 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Beijing, Sebastopol (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Szabo, N.: Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday 2, 9 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tuomela, R.: The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Andrea von Braun Foundation, Munich, under the grant “Blockchain – A Practice-Based Inquiry Into a Future Agent of Social Transformation”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Heidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Heidt, M., Bischof, A. (2020). A Practice-Based Artificial Society Approach to Exploring the Evolution of Trust. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Interaction, Knowledge and Social Media. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12427. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60152-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics