Skip to main content

Collective Decision Making in Swarm Robotics with Distributed Bayesian Hypothesis Testing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12421))

Abstract

In this paper, we propose Distributed Bayesian Hypothesis Testing (DBHT) as a novel collective decision-making strategy to solve the collective perception problem. We experimented with different sampling and dissemination intervals for DBHT and concluded that the selection of both intervals presents a trade-off between speed and accuracy. After that, we compare the performance of DBHT in simulation with that of 3 other commonly used collective decision-making strategies, DVMD, DMMD and DC. We tested them on collective perception problems with different difficulties and feature patterns. We have concluded that DBHT outperforms considered existing algorithms significantly in collective perception tasks with high difficulty, namely close proportion of features and clustered feature distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alanyali, M., Venkatesh, S., Savas, O., Aeron, S.: Distributed Bayesian hypothesis testing in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, vol. 6, pp. 5369–5374. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartashevich, P., Mostaghim, S.: Benchmarking collective perception: new task difficulty metrics for collective decision-making. In: Moura Oliveira, P., Novais, P., Reis, L.P. (eds.) EPIA 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11804, pp. 699–711. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30241-2_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ebert, J.T., Gauci, M., Mallmann-Trenn, F., Nagpal, R.: Bayes bots: collective Bayesian decision-making in decentralized robot swarms. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2020) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ebert, J.T., Gauci, M., Nagpal, R.: Multi-feature collective decision making in robot swarms. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1711–1719. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Francesca, G., Brambilla, M., Trianni, V., Dorigo, M., Birattari, M.: Analysing an evolved robotic behaviour using a biological model of collegial decision making. In: Ziemke, T., Balkenius, C., Hallam, J. (eds.) SAB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7426, pp. 381–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33093-3_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoballah, I.Y., Varshney, P.K.: Distributed Bayesian signal detection. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 35(5), 995–1000 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Mondada, F., et al.: The e-puck, a robot designed for education in engineering. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, vol. 1, pp. 59–65. IPCB: Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morlino, G., Trianni, V., Tuci, E., et al.: Collective perception in a swarm of autonomous robots. In: IJCCI (ICEC), pp. 51–59 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parker, C.A., Zhang, H.: Biologically inspired collective comparisons by robotic swarms. Int. J. Robot. Res. 30(5), 524–535 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salomons, N., Kapellmann-Zafra, G., Groß, R.: Human management of a robotic swarm. In: Alboul, L., Damian, D., Aitken, J. (eds.) TAROS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9716, pp. 282–287. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40379-3_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Strobel, V., Castelló Ferrer, E., Dorigo, M.: Managing Byzantine robots via blockchain technology in a swarm robotics collective decision making scenario. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 541–549. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trabattoni, M., Valentini, G., Dorigo, M.: Hybrid control of swarms for resource selection. In: Dorigo, M., Birattari, M., Blum, C., Christensen, A., Reina, A., Trianni, V. (eds.) ANTS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11172, pp. 57–70. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00533-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Valentini, G., Brambilla, D., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M.: Collective perception of environmental features in a robot swarm. In: Dorigo, M., et al. (eds.) ANTS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9882, pp. 65–76. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44427-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M.: Collective decision with 100 kilobots: speed versus accuracy in binary discrimination problems. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 30(3), 553–580 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Valentini, G., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M.: Efficient decision-making in a self-organizing robot swarm: on the speed versus accuracy trade-off. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1305–1314 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Valentini, G., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M., et al.: Self-organized collective decision making: the weighted voter model. In: AAMAS, pp. 45–52 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Varshney, P.K., Al-Hakeem, S.: Algorithms for sensor fusion, decentralized Bayesian hypothesis testing with feedback, vol. 1. Technical report, Kaman Sciences Corp, Colorado Springs, CO (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qihao Shan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shan, Q., Mostaghim, S. (2020). Collective Decision Making in Swarm Robotics with Distributed Bayesian Hypothesis Testing. In: Dorigo, M., et al. Swarm Intelligence. ANTS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12421. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60376-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60376-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60375-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60376-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics