Skip to main content

Does Supervised Learning of Sentence Candidates Produce the Best Extractive Summaries?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Computational Intelligence (MICAI 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12469))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 779 Accesses

Abstract

In this work multi-document, extractive summaries have been obtained using supervised learning algorithms in a well-known dataset (DUC 2002); the methodology has three steps: the pre-processing step, which filters irrelevant words and reduces vocabulary using stemming; the representation step, which transforms sentences into vectors; and the classification step which selects sentences for the summary. Noting that the last step is crucial because it determines the relevance of each sentence according to the information included in the embeddings. We found that the classifiers performance is not related to the summary quality mainly classifier’s goal is not aligned to summarizer’s goal, as classifier is based on selecting whole sentences, while summarization is evaluated by n-grams, for example ROUGE-n, and therefore it is relevant while comparing performances between different works in the state of the art.

This work has been possible thanks to the support of the Mexican government through the FOINS program of Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) under grants Problemas Nacionales, 5241, Cátedras CONACYT 556; the SIP-IPN research grants SIP 2083, SIP 20200640, and SIP 20200811; IPN-COFAA and IPN-EDI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acevedo-Mosqueda, M.E., Yáñez-Márquez, C., López-Yáñez, I.: Alpha-beta bidirectional associative memories: theory and applications. Neural Process. Lett. 26(1), 1–40 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azhari, M., Jaya Kumar, Y.: Improving text summarization using neuro-fuzzy approach. J. Inf. Telecommun. 1(4), 367–379 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cao, Z., Li, W., Li, S., Wei, F.: Improving multi-document summarization via text classification. In: Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cao, Z., Wei, F., Li, S., Li, W., Zhou, M., Houfeng, W.: Learning summary prior representation for extractive summarization. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers). pp. 829–833 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gambhir, M., Gupta, V.: Recent automatic text summarization techniques: a survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 47(1), 1–66 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-016-9475-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, V., Lehal, G.S.: A survey of text summarization extractive techniques. J. Emerg. Technol. Web Intell. 2(3), 258–268 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hardy, H., Shimizu, N., Strzalkowski, T., Ting, L., Zhang, X., Wise, G.B.: Cross-document summarization by concept classification. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. pp. 121–128. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lau, J.H., Baldwin, T.: An empirical evaluation of doc2vec with practical insights into document embedding generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.05368 (2016)

  9. López-Yáñez, I., Yáñez-Márquez, C., Camacho-Nieto, O., Aldape-Pérez, M., Argüelles-Cruz, A.J.: Collaborative learning in postgraduate level courses. Comput. Human Behav. 51, 938–944 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohri M., R.A., Talwalkar, A.: Foundations of machine learning. MIT Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moreno-Moreno, P., Yanez-Marquez, C., Moreno-Franco, O.A.: The new informatics technologies in education debate. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 1(4), 327–341 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nallapati, R., Zhai, F., Zhou, B.: Summarunner: A recurrent neural network based sequence model for extractive summarization of documents. In: Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tohalino, J.V., Amancio, D.R.: Extractive multi-document summarization using multilayer networks. Phys. A 503, 526–539 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiram Calvo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gutiérrez Hinojosa, S.J., Calvo, H., Moreno-Armendáriz, M.A., Duchanoy, C. (2020). Does Supervised Learning of Sentence Candidates Produce the Best Extractive Summaries?. In: Martínez-Villaseñor, L., Herrera-Alcántara, O., Ponce, H., Castro-Espinoza, F.A. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12469. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60887-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60887-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60886-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60887-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics