Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Capital as Engagement and Belief Revision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12467))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social Capital or “goodwill” is an essential ingredient of any collective activity – be it commercial, cultural or administrative activity. In online environments, several models have been pursued for recording and utilizing social capital based on signals including likes or upvotes. Such explicitly stated signals are susceptible to impulsive behavior and hyperinflation. In this paper, we develop an implicit model for social capital based on the extent of engagement generated by any participant’s activities, and the way this engagement leads to a belief revision about the participant from other members of the community. Two kinds of social capital measures are proposed: an authority score that indicates engagement, and a citizenship score that calibrates value-addition made by a user as a result of engaging with others’ content. The proposed model is implemented in two online communities showing different kinds of content authorities, supported by a strong community of engaged citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://goodwill.zense.co.in.

  2. 2.

    https://circuitverse.org/.

References

  1. Akcomak, T.S., ter Weel, B.: The impact of social capital on crime: evidence from the Netherlands. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 42(1–2), 323–340 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.09.008. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046211001165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ariely, D.: Predictably irrational. Harper Audio (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berne, E.: Games People Play: The Basic Handbook of Transactional Analysis. Ballantine Books, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bolin, K., Lindgren, B., Lindström, M., Nystedt, P.: Investments in social capital - implications of social interactions for the production of health. Soc. Sci. Med. 56(12), 2379–2390 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00242-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12742602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brehm, J., Rahn, W.: Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 41(3), 999–1023 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burt, R.S.: Structural holes vs. network closure as social capital. In: Lin, N., Cook, K.S., Burt, R.S. (eds.) Social Capital, pp. 31–56. Aldine de Gruyter, New York (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600650914

  7. Burt, R.S.: Brokerage and Closure, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbs, J.P., Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Soc. Forces 69(2), 625 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2307/2579680. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2579680?origin=crossref

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grusky, D., Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. In: Inequal. 21st Century, pp. 249–252. Elsevier (2018). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499821-43

  10. Healy, T., Côté, S.: The well-being of nations: the role of human and social capital. In: Education and Skills, vol. 47. ERIC (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00194. http://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33703702.pdf

  11. Jadbabaie, A., Molavi, P., Sandroni, A., Tahbaz-Salehi, A.: Non-bayesian social learning. Games Econ. Behav. 76(1), 210–225 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 618–644 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kadushin, C.: Too much investment in social capital? Soc. Netw. 26(1), 75–90 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahneman, D.: A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am. Psychol. 58(9), 697 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I, pp. 99–127. World Scientific (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, N., Cook, K., Burt, R.S., Wellman, B., Frank, K.A.: Network capital in a multilevel world: getting support from personal communities. In: Lin, N., Cook, K.S., Burt, R.S. (eds.) Social Capital, pp. 233–273. Aldine de Gruyter, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129457-10

  17. Mwangi, I., Ouma, S.: Social capital and access to credit in Kenya. Am. J. Soc. Manag. Sci. 3(1), 8–16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5251/ajsms.2012.3.1.8.16. http://www.scihub.org/AJSMS/PDF/2012/1/AJSMS-3-1-8-16.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng, S., Zhou, Y., Cao, L., Yu, S., Niu, J., Jia, W.: Influence analysis in social networks: a survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 106, 17–32 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Putnam, R.D.: Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

  20. Sen, A.: Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philos. Public Aff. 6(4), 317–344 (1977). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2264946

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sen, A.K.: Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281275

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah, D.V.: Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: an individual-level assessment of social capital. Polit. Psychol. 19(3), 469–496 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tussyadiah, S.P., Kausar, D.R., Soesilo, P.K.: The effect of engagement in online social network on susceptibility to influence. J. Hospit. Tour. Res. 42(2), 201–223 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4), 297–323 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Der Gaag, M., Snijders, T.A.: The resource generator: social capital quantification with concrete items. Soc. Netw. 27(1), 1–29 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Veenstra, G.: Social capital, ses and health: an individual-level analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 50(5), 619–629 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Voorveld, H.A., van Noort, G., Muntinga, D.G., Bronner, F.: Engagement with social media and social media advertising: the differentiating role of platform type. J. Advert. 47(1), 38–54 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vyncke, V., et al.: Does neighbourhood social capital aid in levelling the social gradient in the health and well-being of children and adolescents? A literature review. BMC Public Health 13(1),  65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23339776. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3574053

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Sridhar Mandyam K (IIIT Bangalore) for his help and work on Belief revision model; Dr. Prasad Ram (Gooru) whose work inspired AR and CR metrics; Anshumaan Agrawal (IIIT Bangalore) for countless fruitful discussions and Satvik Ramaprasad (CircuitVerse) for providing data from CircuitVerse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore, India

    Gaurav Koley, Jayati Deshmukh & Srinath Srinivasa

Authors
  1. Gaurav Koley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jayati Deshmukh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Srinath Srinivasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srinath Srinivasa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany

    Samin Aref

  2. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Kalina Bontcheva

  3. King’s College London, London, UK

    Marco Braghieri

  4. Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Frank Dignum

  5. ISTI-CNR, Pisa, Italy

    Fosca Giannotti

  6. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Francesco Grisolia

  7. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Dino Pedreschi

A Appendix: Algorithm for Computing Authority and Citizen Ranks

A Appendix: Algorithm for Computing Authority and Citizen Ranks

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Koley, G., Deshmukh, J., Srinivasa, S. (2020). Social Capital as Engagement and Belief Revision. In: Aref, S., et al. Social Informatics. SocInfo 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60975-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60975-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60974-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60975-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation