Skip to main content

On the Multiple Possible Adaptive Mechanisms of the Continuous Ant Colony Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Intelligent Systems (BRACIS 2020)

Abstract

Among the existing techniques to improve the performance of metaheuristics in optimization problems, adaptive parameter control consists in varying one or more parameters of a given metaheuristic according to some indicator of the search conditions. This approach allows metaheuristics to change algorithmic behaviour during the search, and is particularly relevant for the optimization of dynamic problems. In this research we theoretically analyse in which ways the parameters of the ant colony optimization for continuous domains metaheuristic can be adapted, regarding how each parameter influences exploration and exploitation characteristics of the algorithm. Our experimental contributions include validating the colony success rate as a search condition estimator and choosing suitable maps from this estimator to the parameters q and \(\xi \) of the algorithm. Beyond that, we compare the performances of three proposed adaptive versions of the base metaheuristic and show the benefits of simultaneously adapting multiple parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdelbar, A.M., Salama, K.M.: Parameter self-adaptation in an ant colony algorithm for continuous optimization. IEEE Access 7, 18464–18479 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartz-Beielstein, T.: Evolution strategies and threshold selection. In: Blesa, M.J., Blum, C., Roli, A., Sampels, M. (eds.) HM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3636, pp. 104–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11546245_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Boussaïd, I., Lepagnot, J., Siarry, P.: A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Inf. Sci. 237, 82–117 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chusanapiputt, S., Nualhong, D., Jantarang, S., Phoomvuthisarn, S.: Selective self-adaptive approach to ant system for solving unit commitment problem. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1729–1736 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, V.O.: Bank of metaheuristics (2020). https://github.com/vctrop/bank_of_metaheuristics/tree/BRACIS2020

  6. Eiben, Á.E., Hinterding, R., Michalewicz, Z.: Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3(2), 124–141 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Favaretto, D., Moretti, E., Pellegrini, P.: On the explorative behavior of MAX–MIN ant system. In: Stützle, T., Birattari, M., Hoos, H.H. (eds.) SLS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5752, pp. 115–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03751-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fortin, F.A., De Rainville, F.M., Gardner, M.A., Parizeau, M., Gagné, C.: DEAP: evolutionary algorithms made easy. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 2171–2175 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoos, H.H.: Automated algorithm configuration and parameter tuning. In: Hamadi, Y., Monfroy, E., Saubion, F. (eds.) Autonomous Search, pp. 37–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21434-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, C., Li, Y., Yao, X.: A survey of automatic parameter tuning methods for metaheuristics. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 24, 201–216 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karafotias, G., Hoogendoorn, M., Eiben, Á.E.: Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms: trends and challenges. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19(2), 167–187 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Z., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., Li, X.: A novel cloud-based fuzzy self-adaptive ant colony system. In: 2008 Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation, vol. 7, pp. 460–465. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liao, T., Montes de Oca, M.A., Aydin, D., Stützle, T., Dorigo, M.: An incremental ant colony algorithm with local search for continuous optimization. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 125–132 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martins, T., Sato, A., Tsuzuki, M.: Adaptive neighborhood heuristics for simulated annealing over continuous variables. INTECH Open Access Publisher (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nickabadi, A., Ebadzadeh, M.M., Safabakhsh, R.: A novel particle swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive inertia weight. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(4), 3658–3670 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oliphant, T.E.: A Guide to NumPy, vol. 1. Trelgol Publishing, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Omran, M., Polakova, R.: A memetic and adaptive continuous ant colony optimization algorithm. In: Aliev, R.A., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W., Jamshidi, M., Babanli, M.B., Sadikoglu, F.M. (eds.) ICSCCW 2019. AISC, vol. 1095, pp. 158–166. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35249-3_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Poláková, R., Tvrdík, J., Bujok, P.: Adaptation of population size according to current population diversity in differential evolution. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Socha, K., Dorigo, M.: Ant colony optimization for continuous domains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185(3), 1155–1173 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Stützle, T., et al.: Parameter adaptation in ant colony optimization. In: Hamadi, Y., Monfroy, E., Saubion, F. (eds.) Autonomous Search, pp. 191–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21434-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilcoxon, F., Katti, S., Wilcox, R.A.: Critical values and probability levels for the wilcoxon rank sum test and the wilcoxon signed rank test. Sel. Tables Math. Stat. 1, 171–259 (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, Q., et al.: Adaptive multimodal continuous ant colony optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 21(2), 191–205 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, J., et al.: A survey on algorithm adaptation in evolutionary computation. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. 7(1), 16–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor O. Costa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Costa, V.O., Müller, F.M. (2020). On the Multiple Possible Adaptive Mechanisms of the Continuous Ant Colony Optimization. In: Cerri, R., Prati, R.C. (eds) Intelligent Systems. BRACIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61377-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61377-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61376-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61377-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics